A quote that massively applies to the psyop that is 9/11 is:
"All propaganda is lies even when one is telling the truth."
George Orwell
A great deal of truth is said about 9/11, including, of course, that WTC-7 came down in a perfect implosion - showcased to us from seven vantage points, however, that truth distracts us from other equally if not more important truths. Anyone not subject to propagandistic hypnosis can work out (albeit perhaps with some guidance from professionals - thanks, Richard) that the three towers came down by controlled demolition but what about the answers to these questions:
1. Why did they bring down WTC-7 on 9/11 and showcase its perfect implosion to us from seven vantage points when they much more discreetly ensured damage to WTCs 3, 4, 5 and 6, bringing them down later with no fanfare? (If there was anything they wanted hidden in 7 which could equally apply to any of the other buildings that didn't mean they had to bring it down on 9/11, they still could have brought it down later.)
2. If 3,000 people died and 6,000 were injured as they tell us, why did journalists report "empty ambulances and rescue vehicles" parading past the trauma centre set up in West Manhattan?
5. Why did mainstream media inform us about a group of suspicious-looking men seemingly celebrating after the twin tower destructions who we were told turned out to be Mossad agents and Israeli art students working on a project in the twin towers when this alleged data undermines the Arab terrorist story?
A quote that massively applies to the psyop that is 9/11 is:
"All propaganda is lies even when one is telling the truth."
George Orwell
A great deal of truth is said about 9/11, including, of course, that WTC-7 came down in a perfect implosion - showcased to us from seven vantage points, however, that truth distracts us from other equally if not more important truths. Anyone not subject to propagandistic hypnosis can work out (albeit perhaps with some guidance from professionals - thanks, Richard) that the three towers came down by controlled demolition but what about the answers to these questions:
1. Why did they bring down WTC-7 on 9/11 and showcase its perfect implosion to us from seven vantage points when they much more discreetly ensured damage to WTCs 3, 4, 5 and 6, bringing them down later with no fanfare? (If there was anything they wanted hidden in 7 which could equally apply to any of the other buildings that didn't mean they had to bring it down on 9/11, they still could have brought it down later.)
2. If 3,000 people died and 6,000 were injured as they tell us, why did journalists report "empty ambulances and rescue vehicles" parading past the trauma centre set up in West Manhattan?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhGfXPGh5kI
3. Why are we told that Pasquale Buzzelli survived the 12-second collapse of the North Tower ... seemingly without a scratch?
http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/sept11/2003/n_9189/
4. Why is this man presented to us as a burns victim when he is clearly simply suffering from vitiligo?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTx18_yI3Xk
5. Why did mainstream media inform us about a group of suspicious-looking men seemingly celebrating after the twin tower destructions who we were told turned out to be Mossad agents and Israeli art students working on a project in the twin towers when this alleged data undermines the Arab terrorist story?