I’ve studied the physics of collisions & a very serious question being: WHY with the attitude of FLT175 ( that is the alleged FLT175 ) being as follows: Roll=28deg, Yaw=14deg, Pitch=3deg . . . WHY should the plane have penetrated straight in?
My grandmother was in NYC at the time. It wasn't fake.
Obviously, the trajectory of a plane that is doing maneuvers is not the same as where the nose is pointed at that moment, but honestly, I do not know what you're even talking about with "straight in", versus these numbers. I am not validating any of them as I point out the flaw in your thinking.
For the total collapse of the lower part to ground level the falling upper part of each Twin Towers the upper part would have had to magically increased its weight five or six times in order to crush of the lower part made up of thicker/stronger steel. We know that cannot happen. The outcome of upper lighter section should have resulted as occurs when car impacts a semi truck. The car is smashed, and the semi-truck moves very little away from the car. A five to one ratio in weight is easy for most people to guess what will happen.
-------------------------------------
A good video/lecture as to why we need a new FBI investigation or new Congressional investigation of 9/11
World Trade Center building Seven (WTC7) had fire proofing covering all the steel beams in it and it was not hit by an airplane.
Dr. Leroy Halsey said no main stream media has interviewed him.
April 6, 2024: Professor, Zdeněk P. Bažant submitted an analysis to the ASCE's Journal of Engineering Mechanics that contained glaring errors and inaccurate assumptions to explain why the Twin Towers collapsed following the airplane impacts. Roland Angle, working with mechanical engineer Tony Szamboti think they have found mathematical errors in his analysis that ignore certain fundamental laws of physics and which destroy the foundation on which National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) based its theory of for why the progressive collapse occurred.
Therefore the NIST reports were highly unscientific and merely papered over the easily observable evidence that explosives caused the Twin Towers' destruction.
The NIST report on the destruction of the towers, published in 2005 only gave a hypothetical explanation for the initiation of the failures of the Twin Towers. It did not describe the mechanics of the total collapses of the Twin Towers and specifically endorsed Bažant’s theory to explain how the 110 story towers experienced complete collapse.
Bažant grossly overestimated input values that would be destructive and grossly underestimated input values that would be resistive.
The 2001 Anthrax Letter Attacks that enhanced the lie that Iraq had WMDs.
And when the US Attorney, The Court of Appeals, and the US Supreme Court refuses to empanel a grand jury to judge the direct evidence that proves explosions and/or incendiaries caused the total collapses of the World Trade Center buildings, our representative democracy is disabled.
The odds? Lt. Colonel David Gapp tell us about 9/11 Aviation Improbabilities
What are the odds the alleged hijackers would know where over the US to turn off the airplanes transponder and where to make a u-turn to better not be seen on the ATC/Norad radar screens?
What are the odds of them flying a 330 degree coordinate-flight turn from 7,000 feet and hitting the Pentagon, when skilled pilots could only do this one in three attempts in a simulator? ZERO
None of the passengers could have made a cell phone to report the alleged hijackers with box cutters, because the airplanes were too high and flying at some 500 mph. IMPOSSIBLE.
What are the odds that eight airline’s pilots would allow the alleged hijackers to take over their airplane? And the odds of taking over the four airplanes without pilots turning the airplane upside down to knock the alleged hijacker off their feet?
What are the odds of the very unskilled hijacker pilots hitting the Twin Towers at some 500 mph? ZERO.
The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), as the leading engineering organization in the United States, also abetted the crime by endorsing NIST's fraudulent 9/11 reports and attempting to shut down any challenge to the official story within their membership.
This link explains the science that proves NIST and ASCE are guilty of lying to Americans. NIST therefore lied to the US Congress who had task NIST which is under the Department of Commerce to explain how and why the three World Trade Center buildings collapsed on 9/11. NIST DID NOT explain why or how the Twin Towers totally collapsed. That alone is violation of the tasking Congress ordered to be done of a mass murder incident. Never before nor after 9/11 has any steel high rise building ever collapse due to fire, as was the case of World Trade Center building seven and the wreckage piles of all three buildings remain unexplained too hot and producing white smoke for over a month. The New York Fired department poured massive amounts of water onto this wreckage, yet the heat and white smoke continued for over a month and therein pointing to a fire burning in the wreckage. Given this smoke was only white also is evidence that the white smoke was aluminum oxide produced by the burning of nano-thermite which burns even under water.
send me a fB message with your email address for this book for free.
Some new information about why WTC7 collapsed, but the video assumes someone sped up the speed of the video of WTC7 falling. Maybe explosives were not used on WTC7. How about the Twin Towers?
Here is a huge smoking gun : Silverstein stated in an interview ‘ Building Seven was damaged by office fires, so WE MADE THE DECISION TO ‘PULL IT’! To ‘pull’ ( professional demolition) a building of that size, with such minimal damage meant it would have to be professionally wired with thousands of charges to do the job of ‘pulling it’ ( his words) , which would take months or more to prepare, not two hours! So, that being the case, it looks like the Towers were ‘pulled’ after the drones had hit.All three buildings were ‘pulled’ in such a way that they would all fall into their own footprint.Careless blunder from Silverstein that blows the cover on the whole horrific exercise.
This has been examined tens of thousands of times, and this nest of conspiracy theories is continually disproven.
So, no, your "evidence" or rather, your claims, are not "irrefutable".
I watched this happen live.
I saw no evidence that any of it was faked.
There have been countless structural analyses after the fact that have pointed out the structural vulnerabilities to intense heat.
You can believe what you want, but I don't know why you insist on bedeviling us with more and more conspiracy theories about this. It's a waste of everyone's time.
There was at one point a group that analyzed the chemical composition of some ot the structural steel of the World Trade Center towers. They found evidence of thermite. Afterwards, I believe, the NIST took the research over. If you know of the original study I would like to see their results. Thank you.
Yes - this was FEMA Report of May 2002 - the Metallurgical Report included in Appendix C. It is included about midway through the presentation above. And here:
It certainly had to be applied in large amounts to do that much damage and cause that much heat. I suppose the "fireproofing" project of the towers would have been a good opportunity to spray it on there?
Liking alliteration like you, I’ll give a qualified “Yes” to being a “Truther Trooper.”
Furthermore: Would you agree to identify as a #CREATORS, a Conspiracy Realist Educator Activist Truther Organizer Reader Socializer?
We’re dissidents in the Ages Old Struggle, not “fight,” for #SocialJustice. Ours is the nonpartisan & nonviolent #RevolutionOfAwareness for #FreeingTruthAndReconciliation (ref. Bollyn.com, John 8:32 & #NelsonMandela, respectively).
I'm reaching out to bring light to an unprecedented legal battle with far-reaching implications for intellectual property rights, due process, and constitutional protections. In March 2021, I filed a revolutionary VR treadmill patent, US 11,577,177, which was stolen directly from the USPTO upon filing. My name and this very patent are now listed at the top of Netflix's US Patent 11,810,254, granted on November 7, 2023, for the exact same technology — filed just 12 days after my initial application.
This technology is essentially the 'holy grail' of VR/AR, the metaverse, military training simulations, and virtual film production. The military-industrial complex, the U.S. State Department, and multiple defense contractors, including Lockheed Martin, appear to be directly involved due to the vast implications my patent holds in military training simulations. I even had (Lucky Larry..) Silverstein Properties search for me - which I would still say is the most 'crazy' search of all of them.
The Hennepin County District Court is currently depriving me of due process and constitutional rights through a blatantly false determination of incompetency, with the clear goal of 'disappearing' me into a mental institution under the guise of being 'psychotic.' The enormous financial stakes tied to my stolen patent and the court's unprecedented actions demand broader attention.
I urgently need support to expose these unconstitutional actions and bring justice to my case, which could set a dangerous precedent if left unchecked. The integrity of our legal system and the protection of intellectual property are at risk.
My completely compromised defense attorney 'CLR Bruce Rivers'
is either being paid off / threatened / highly incentivized, but he REFUSES to withdrawal from my case despite multiple direct requests, being named as defendant in my federal lawsuit, a pro se filed 'motion for substitute counsel', and a HUGE list of 'issues' overall which prove he is not working on my behalf at all - he will not even take any of the actions I have suggested such as a neutral examiner, a competency hearing, etc.
If anyone can help bring more attention to this case or offer legal assistance (amicus curiae briefs, civil rights, or criminal defense support), it could make a significant difference. I fear for my safety and am desperate for any support to prevent being 'disappeared' into a mental institution, which seems to be 'their' goal all along, with me narrowly escaping this the last two times.
Thanks for reading, and sorry for interrupting the comment section with unrelated content but I am very worried about what is taking place for obvious reasons.
Yup. This rabbit hole behind in 1947, with the sychophant murderer Allen Dulles devising an increasingly secretive agency comprised, almost entirely, of sociopaths.
Kennedy was Allen Dulles most ambitious assassination, though certainly not his first.
That the press, already in the right grip of the Luciferian globalists, wove an air of infallibility and flawlessness to government, is evident.
& not to forget that the alleged airliner crashes, were totally bogus.
No airliner ever flown could have done what the alleged FLT11, FLT175, FLT77 & FLT93 was said to have done upon crashing.
You base this assertion on what?
It's a ton of mass, moving fast, full of jet fuel.
It's impossible why?
You know you don't have a good answer.
If you'd studied more high energy physics, it would be less confusing to you.
I’ve studied the physics of collisions & a very serious question being: WHY with the attitude of FLT175 ( that is the alleged FLT175 ) being as follows: Roll=28deg, Yaw=14deg, Pitch=3deg . . . WHY should the plane have penetrated straight in?
I watched the plane hit the building...
Are you saying it was a hologram?
My grandmother was in NYC at the time. It wasn't fake.
Obviously, the trajectory of a plane that is doing maneuvers is not the same as where the nose is pointed at that moment, but honestly, I do not know what you're even talking about with "straight in", versus these numbers. I am not validating any of them as I point out the flaw in your thinking.
the attitude numbers are from the OFFICIAL FAIRY TALE as published at taxpayer expense.
Are you saying the numbers are wrong?
the numbers are total fantasy . . . there was NO airliner(s)
For the total collapse of the lower part to ground level the falling upper part of each Twin Towers the upper part would have had to magically increased its weight five or six times in order to crush of the lower part made up of thicker/stronger steel. We know that cannot happen. The outcome of upper lighter section should have resulted as occurs when car impacts a semi truck. The car is smashed, and the semi-truck moves very little away from the car. A five to one ratio in weight is easy for most people to guess what will happen.
-------------------------------------
A good video/lecture as to why we need a new FBI investigation or new Congressional investigation of 9/11
part one WTC7
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXAuYjcjjPo
Part 2: NIST’s false statements about the Twin Towers' collapse
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6F16xBQPMU
Part 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YLaPD7AVJE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWi0x9xigQM
World Trade Center building Seven (WTC7) had fire proofing covering all the steel beams in it and it was not hit by an airplane.
Dr. Leroy Halsey said no main stream media has interviewed him.
April 6, 2024: Professor, Zdeněk P. Bažant submitted an analysis to the ASCE's Journal of Engineering Mechanics that contained glaring errors and inaccurate assumptions to explain why the Twin Towers collapsed following the airplane impacts. Roland Angle, working with mechanical engineer Tony Szamboti think they have found mathematical errors in his analysis that ignore certain fundamental laws of physics and which destroy the foundation on which National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) based its theory of for why the progressive collapse occurred.
Therefore the NIST reports were highly unscientific and merely papered over the easily observable evidence that explosives caused the Twin Towers' destruction.
The NIST report on the destruction of the towers, published in 2005 only gave a hypothetical explanation for the initiation of the failures of the Twin Towers. It did not describe the mechanics of the total collapses of the Twin Towers and specifically endorsed Bažant’s theory to explain how the 110 story towers experienced complete collapse.
Bažant grossly overestimated input values that would be destructive and grossly underestimated input values that would be resistive.
The 2001 Anthrax Letter Attacks that enhanced the lie that Iraq had WMDs.
Source: see this URL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6MKBJSLqJc&t=281s
Kevin Ryan is the foremost authority on what happened that day as Editor of the Journal of 9/11 Studies A YouTube video of him being interviewed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xrnx5yhihj8
And when the US Attorney, The Court of Appeals, and the US Supreme Court refuses to empanel a grand jury to judge the direct evidence that proves explosions and/or incendiaries caused the total collapses of the World Trade Center buildings, our representative democracy is disabled.
The odds? Lt. Colonel David Gapp tell us about 9/11 Aviation Improbabilities
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1491828354927727&aggr_v_ids[0]=1491828354927727¬if_id=1700307835597620¬if_t=watch_follower_video&ref=notif
What are the odds the alleged hijackers would know where over the US to turn off the airplanes transponder and where to make a u-turn to better not be seen on the ATC/Norad radar screens?
What are the odds of them flying a 330 degree coordinate-flight turn from 7,000 feet and hitting the Pentagon, when skilled pilots could only do this one in three attempts in a simulator? ZERO
None of the passengers could have made a cell phone to report the alleged hijackers with box cutters, because the airplanes were too high and flying at some 500 mph. IMPOSSIBLE.
What are the odds that eight airline’s pilots would allow the alleged hijackers to take over their airplane? And the odds of taking over the four airplanes without pilots turning the airplane upside down to knock the alleged hijacker off their feet?
What are the odds of the very unskilled hijacker pilots hitting the Twin Towers at some 500 mph? ZERO.
The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), as the leading engineering organization in the United States, also abetted the crime by endorsing NIST's fraudulent 9/11 reports and attempting to shut down any challenge to the official story within their membership.
This link explains the science that proves NIST and ASCE are guilty of lying to Americans. NIST therefore lied to the US Congress who had task NIST which is under the Department of Commerce to explain how and why the three World Trade Center buildings collapsed on 9/11. NIST DID NOT explain why or how the Twin Towers totally collapsed. That alone is violation of the tasking Congress ordered to be done of a mass murder incident. Never before nor after 9/11 has any steel high rise building ever collapse due to fire, as was the case of World Trade Center building seven and the wreckage piles of all three buildings remain unexplained too hot and producing white smoke for over a month. The New York Fired department poured massive amounts of water onto this wreckage, yet the heat and white smoke continued for over a month and therein pointing to a fire burning in the wreckage. Given this smoke was only white also is evidence that the white smoke was aluminum oxide produced by the burning of nano-thermite which burns even under water.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_U6v7MqDzE&t=15s
Seattle, Washington 9/11 Truth | Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1682340582584261
send me a fB message with your email address for this book for free.
Some new information about why WTC7 collapsed, but the video assumes someone sped up the speed of the video of WTC7 falling. Maybe explosives were not used on WTC7. How about the Twin Towers?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMvCWFCoVN4
Why weren’t the war games cancelled given all the intelligence about the something big was just about to happen?
for my book “9/11 Hard Evidence”
Send me a Facebook message with your email address
and I will reply with the book for FREE
Or going onto Amazon Kindle Books
From: Richard McManus
Chief Warrant Officer-3/counterintelligence special agent, US Army, retired, BS psychology and nursing, Everett, WA
Here is a huge smoking gun : Silverstein stated in an interview ‘ Building Seven was damaged by office fires, so WE MADE THE DECISION TO ‘PULL IT’! To ‘pull’ ( professional demolition) a building of that size, with such minimal damage meant it would have to be professionally wired with thousands of charges to do the job of ‘pulling it’ ( his words) , which would take months or more to prepare, not two hours! So, that being the case, it looks like the Towers were ‘pulled’ after the drones had hit.All three buildings were ‘pulled’ in such a way that they would all fall into their own footprint.Careless blunder from Silverstein that blows the cover on the whole horrific exercise.
Keep up the good work. The truth is getting out.
It would be useful to see the official responses to these findings
We will #NeverForget, and we’ll never quit our #LongMarch #Struggle4SocialJustice. #RightMakesMight, eventually.
So you're saying the Republican Party did this? That wouldn't surprise me much, W is dumb as a rock, and anyone could have put something over on him.
This has been examined tens of thousands of times, and this nest of conspiracy theories is continually disproven.
So, no, your "evidence" or rather, your claims, are not "irrefutable".
I watched this happen live.
I saw no evidence that any of it was faked.
There have been countless structural analyses after the fact that have pointed out the structural vulnerabilities to intense heat.
You can believe what you want, but I don't know why you insist on bedeviling us with more and more conspiracy theories about this. It's a waste of everyone's time.
Best way to say it, Richard. Please drop me a note. Your friend Blago
There was at one point a group that analyzed the chemical composition of some ot the structural steel of the World Trade Center towers. They found evidence of thermite. Afterwards, I believe, the NIST took the research over. If you know of the original study I would like to see their results. Thank you.
Yes - this was FEMA Report of May 2002 - the Metallurgical Report included in Appendix C. It is included about midway through the presentation above. And here:
https://richardgage911.org/wp-content/uploads/C-Limited-Metallurgical-Examination.pdf
Thanks. I remember reading about the sulfur years ago, but I wanted to see the original source again. My understanding is that thermite + sulfer = thermate. https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/steel-sulfidation
It certainly had to be applied in large amounts to do that much damage and cause that much heat. I suppose the "fireproofing" project of the towers would have been a good opportunity to spray it on there?
Richard. Are you a controlled propaganda account?
Irrefutable. That is fucking rich.
Incontrovertible, then, Tool or Dupe.
I assume I am the Tool or dupe at the end?
Lincoln are you a 9/11 truther trooper?
Liking alliteration like you, I’ll give a qualified “Yes” to being a “Truther Trooper.”
Furthermore: Would you agree to identify as a #CREATORS, a Conspiracy Realist Educator Activist Truther Organizer Reader Socializer?
We’re dissidents in the Ages Old Struggle, not “fight,” for #SocialJustice. Ours is the nonpartisan & nonviolent #RevolutionOfAwareness for #FreeingTruthAndReconciliation (ref. Bollyn.com, John 8:32 & #NelsonMandela, respectively).
The victims of 9/11 and their families are the criminals. The witnesses are the accomplices. The content creators are the distraction.
Hello Richard Gage,
I'm reaching out to bring light to an unprecedented legal battle with far-reaching implications for intellectual property rights, due process, and constitutional protections. In March 2021, I filed a revolutionary VR treadmill patent, US 11,577,177, which was stolen directly from the USPTO upon filing. My name and this very patent are now listed at the top of Netflix's US Patent 11,810,254, granted on November 7, 2023, for the exact same technology — filed just 12 days after my initial application.
This technology is essentially the 'holy grail' of VR/AR, the metaverse, military training simulations, and virtual film production. The military-industrial complex, the U.S. State Department, and multiple defense contractors, including Lockheed Martin, appear to be directly involved due to the vast implications my patent holds in military training simulations. I even had (Lucky Larry..) Silverstein Properties search for me - which I would still say is the most 'crazy' search of all of them.
https://MattGuertin.Substack.com/p/linked-in-search-count-graph
The Hennepin County District Court is currently depriving me of due process and constitutional rights through a blatantly false determination of incompetency, with the clear goal of 'disappearing' me into a mental institution under the guise of being 'psychotic.' The enormous financial stakes tied to my stolen patent and the court's unprecedented actions demand broader attention.
I urgently need support to expose these unconstitutional actions and bring justice to my case, which could set a dangerous precedent if left unchecked. The integrity of our legal system and the protection of intellectual property are at risk.
My completely compromised defense attorney 'CLR Bruce Rivers'
https://www.youtube.com/@CLRBruceRivers
is either being paid off / threatened / highly incentivized, but he REFUSES to withdrawal from my case despite multiple direct requests, being named as defendant in my federal lawsuit, a pro se filed 'motion for substitute counsel', and a HUGE list of 'issues' overall which prove he is not working on my behalf at all - he will not even take any of the actions I have suggested such as a neutral examiner, a competency hearing, etc.
https://MattGuertin.Substack.com/p/clr-bruce-rivers
If anyone can help bring more attention to this case or offer legal assistance (amicus curiae briefs, civil rights, or criminal defense support), it could make a significant difference. I fear for my safety and am desperate for any support to prevent being 'disappeared' into a mental institution, which seems to be 'their' goal all along, with me narrowly escaping this the last two times.
MN Federal District Case - https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68925331/guertin-v-hennepin-county/
8th Circuit Court of Appeals Case - https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69060054/matthew-guertin-v-hennepin-county/
45 Min Documentary Detailing Fraud - https://rumble.com/v4d6i1r-matthew-david-vs.-goliath.html
My Substack - https://MattGuertin.Substack.com
My personal portfolio page for credibility - https://www.MattGuertin.com
Thanks for reading, and sorry for interrupting the comment section with unrelated content but I am very worried about what is taking place for obvious reasons.
No brainer. It's an Obama job, inside job by Americans killing Americans and no one pays the consequences
Weren’t the charges set by the Mossad
Yup. This rabbit hole behind in 1947, with the sychophant murderer Allen Dulles devising an increasingly secretive agency comprised, almost entirely, of sociopaths.
Kennedy was Allen Dulles most ambitious assassination, though certainly not his first.
That the press, already in the right grip of the Luciferian globalists, wove an air of infallibility and flawlessness to government, is evident.
It started in 1946 and 1799. And 1630
Right? Ultimately, it started with Cain...
You forgot to mention the fact that twin towers were purchased and over insured just months before 9/11.