You are doing the job that NIST should have done and could still do if they decided to save face with the American Public. 1) For the safety of anyone who works now or would be working in a high rise building, 2) for the safety of any customers or clients who would be visiting offices in high rise buildings, and 3) for the safety of firefighters who would be fighting those fires, we need answers. WHAT EXACTLY HAPPENED ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001. NIST has the budget to get answers, NIST chose not to provide answers. It is obvious to the professionals and to anyone who observed the collapse of the buildings and much more to those who personally witnessed the collapse of the buildings that IT WAS NOT CAUSED “ONLY” BY OFFICE FIRES. If I, a person who watched the event on television can declare beyond any shadow of doubt that the towers did not explode due to office fire, how much more obvious it is to NIST as to firefighters, themselves, many of whom lost their lives that day. The NIST spokesman can tell himself that he is being honest because “there were office fires,” TOO, but his job it to disclose the TRUTH accurately and COMPLETELY. What else was going on that day and on the days prior to 9/11/2001, that could have and would have or actually DID CONTRIBUTE to the destruction of the Twin Towers and of Building 7 on September 11, 2001? For the safety of anyone who now works or who would be working in a high rise building, for the safety of any customers or clients who would be visiting offices in those buildings, and for the safety of firefighters who might have to fight fires in those buildings, we need answers. Hundreds of Firefighters lost their lives that day! NIST chose not to provide answers. It is obvious to the professionals and to anyone who observed the collapse of those buildings and much more to all those who personally witnessed the collapse of those buildings that their total destruction WAS NOT CAUSED “ONLY” BY OFFICE FIRES. The NIST spokesman can tell himself that he is being somewhat honest because “there were office fires,” but his job it to disclose the COMPLETE ACCURATE TRUTH to the American people. It is the duty of NIST to disclose a thorough and transparent report with facts about all of the events that day, excluding nothing. What else was going on that day and on the days prior to 9/11/2001 that could have, would have or DID CONTRIBUTE to the destruction of the Twin Towers and of Building 7 on September 11, 2001?
Yes Building 7 had firesprinklers with a backup water tank in the building
Office Furniture fires, government agencies their Furniture is mostly Metal filing cabinets.. NIST claimed that the North Tower fell and broke the water main I used to live in NYC broken water main means the whole neighborhood gets flooded in 911 videos and pictures I dont see a broken water main on 911 anywhere..please look into it ask the firefighters were was there a broken water main on 911
Hello Richard and Gail,
You are doing the job that NIST should have done and could still do if they decided to save face with the American Public. 1) For the safety of anyone who works now or would be working in a high rise building, 2) for the safety of any customers or clients who would be visiting offices in high rise buildings, and 3) for the safety of firefighters who would be fighting those fires, we need answers. WHAT EXACTLY HAPPENED ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001. NIST has the budget to get answers, NIST chose not to provide answers. It is obvious to the professionals and to anyone who observed the collapse of the buildings and much more to those who personally witnessed the collapse of the buildings that IT WAS NOT CAUSED “ONLY” BY OFFICE FIRES. If I, a person who watched the event on television can declare beyond any shadow of doubt that the towers did not explode due to office fire, how much more obvious it is to NIST as to firefighters, themselves, many of whom lost their lives that day. The NIST spokesman can tell himself that he is being honest because “there were office fires,” TOO, but his job it to disclose the TRUTH accurately and COMPLETELY. What else was going on that day and on the days prior to 9/11/2001, that could have and would have or actually DID CONTRIBUTE to the destruction of the Twin Towers and of Building 7 on September 11, 2001? For the safety of anyone who now works or who would be working in a high rise building, for the safety of any customers or clients who would be visiting offices in those buildings, and for the safety of firefighters who might have to fight fires in those buildings, we need answers. Hundreds of Firefighters lost their lives that day! NIST chose not to provide answers. It is obvious to the professionals and to anyone who observed the collapse of those buildings and much more to all those who personally witnessed the collapse of those buildings that their total destruction WAS NOT CAUSED “ONLY” BY OFFICE FIRES. The NIST spokesman can tell himself that he is being somewhat honest because “there were office fires,” but his job it to disclose the COMPLETE ACCURATE TRUTH to the American people. It is the duty of NIST to disclose a thorough and transparent report with facts about all of the events that day, excluding nothing. What else was going on that day and on the days prior to 9/11/2001 that could have, would have or DID CONTRIBUTE to the destruction of the Twin Towers and of Building 7 on September 11, 2001?
Yes Building 7 had firesprinklers with a backup water tank in the building
Office Furniture fires, government agencies their Furniture is mostly Metal filing cabinets.. NIST claimed that the North Tower fell and broke the water main I used to live in NYC broken water main means the whole neighborhood gets flooded in 911 videos and pictures I dont see a broken water main on 911 anywhere..please look into it ask the firefighters were was there a broken water main on 911