It’s almost as easy to photoshop video as it is ordinary photographs. The was no live TV viewing on the 9th only supposed private videos were available on the 10th with added dialogue and screams. Also, there was one impossible clip showing an intact cockpit emerging from the building. The videos also improved with time. On the video showing a road gang, that was swung over to the first tower to be hit, contained a plane that was ridiculously small, and grew larger in later versions.
Also, what happened to the engines? Only one engine as found but it was of the wrong make.
An aircraft overflew all the towers at precisely the right time, but at the Pentagon, without the city canyon effect, the idea failed. Four air craft crashes, with no luggage saved, one engine of the wrong sort, no bodies, the same scenario being enacted by the military on the same day, modern passenger aircraft being flown by amateurs. Only in the USA would people believe such rubbish.
What became of the passengers and crews of these four aircraft?
Captain Ed Toner was not only a retired jumbo jet pilot he was also a retired jumbo jet pilot instructor. He called up Boeing and id'd himself and asked if the 911 planes had equipment to override the pilots controls. They told him that information is classified. He remarked, "We would be the last to know".
It was the alleged fan blade discovered in the Pentagon wreckage (as traced by part number to the Douglas A3-D Sky Warrior) that convinced me fishy things had gone on here. I then began taking a closer look at what our government, media types were saying, reporting, about the 9/11 disasters. I had worked on the Navy's version of the twin jet engine A-3 (KA-3B) Sky Warrior as a 3rd Class aviation electrician, c. '67-'68, during the Vietnam War. It was due to it's huge bomb bay many of these A-3s had been converted into refuelers, for use in inflight fueling of carrier-based attack aircraft in bombing missions over Nam. Some A-3s had also been converted into 'snoopers' and painted black, some sporting 'port holes' along it's length, apparently for viewing of it's onboard tech crew where the bomb bay would normally be. From my research, the Sky Warrior was initially designed in the 50s for either the Airforce or the Navy, depending on what source you read, apparently for delivering nuclear weapons in one-way flights to Russia should war break out with them. So it's not too hard to imagine that cruise-type missile systems could have been substituted in the bomb bay cavity later on, once active service of the A-3 for other duties had been phased out. Also, drone-type controls could have been installed as well, thereby allowing a repainted, remote-controlled 'airline look-alike', complete with port hole-style windows, to fly into the Pentagon on 9/11. The scant video evidence released by the government of the attack to-date is hardly dispositive of the matter. Mind, this is only a theory of mine, not based on fact. Others may yet find more evidence linking the A-3 to this role, and possibly proving, once and for all, what really did hit the Pentagon that day -- if not identifying the perps who actually did this.
For the 767 models in particular, a Boeing controls engineer alleged that there was a back-door access port to the control system, intended to be used for system test, and presumably on the ground. I heard no such allegations for the 757s, but he may not have worked on the 757 project.
There were only two planes, and none at WTC. Flight 77 that overflew the Pentagon and must have landed at Reagan - and UA 93 that was probably shot down.
Why did AIG pay Larry Silverstein $4billion of insurance money without an investigation? Perhaps that money was printed up by the Fed, under Rothschild orders.
Before we consider if the planes were remote controlled, lets consider if there even Were any planes. Can planes fly at altitudes of 800 feet without their wings being ripped off? What is the likelihood that pilots went "2 for 2" in succeeding in executing such difficult maneuvers to hit their targets? Wouldn't ANY plane hitting a structure with such a "THICK STEEL" outer skeleton literally crumple on the outside of the structure rather than appear to be absorbed into it as if it were a sponge? Then if the answers to all these questions still allow for a plane to do what it appears they did, then we can ask the question, 'if the planes may have been remote controlled.' If not, let's not try to create a new narrative which would only muddy the waters even more than the perpetrators of this event have been successful in doing.
Before we consider if the planes were remote controlled, lets consider if there even Were any planes. Can planes fly at altitudes of 800 feet without their wings being ripped off? What is the likelihood that pilots went "2 for 2" in succeeding in executing such difficult maneuvers to hit their targets? Wouldn't ANY plane hitting a structure with such a "THICK STEEL" outer skeleton literally crumple on the outside of the structure rather than appear to be absorbed into it as if it were a sponge? Then if the answers to all these questions still allow for a plane to do what it appears they did, then we can ask the question, 'if the planes may have been remote controlled.' If not, let's not try to create a new narrative which would only muddy the waters even more than the perpetrators of this event have been successful in doing.
I'm VERY skeptical of the "no planes" theories and consider them probable disinformation. If seen from certain angles in certain directions the fireball would be visible but not the impacting aircraft. I HEARD the impact of the second plane all the way from Brooklyn - the most horrible sound I've ever heard!
When a Boeing engineer was asked if their planes can fly at over 400 mph at sea level the immediate response was absolutely not. Commercial aircraft cannot sustain the measured speed of the vehicles that hit the WTC
Very likely there were no passengers on the aircraft, they were remotely controlled drones focussed on a homing signal from the towers. The Pentagon was hit by a missile with a hard tip.
Since the alleged hijackers were still alive on September 12th 2001, the aircraft must have been remotely controlled.
It’s almost as easy to photoshop video as it is ordinary photographs. The was no live TV viewing on the 9th only supposed private videos were available on the 10th with added dialogue and screams. Also, there was one impossible clip showing an intact cockpit emerging from the building. The videos also improved with time. On the video showing a road gang, that was swung over to the first tower to be hit, contained a plane that was ridiculously small, and grew larger in later versions.
Also, what happened to the engines? Only one engine as found but it was of the wrong make.
An aircraft overflew all the towers at precisely the right time, but at the Pentagon, without the city canyon effect, the idea failed. Four air craft crashes, with no luggage saved, one engine of the wrong sort, no bodies, the same scenario being enacted by the military on the same day, modern passenger aircraft being flown by amateurs. Only in the USA would people believe such rubbish.
What became of the passengers and crews of these four aircraft?
Captain Ed Toner was not only a retired jumbo jet pilot he was also a retired jumbo jet pilot instructor. He called up Boeing and id'd himself and asked if the 911 planes had equipment to override the pilots controls. They told him that information is classified. He remarked, "We would be the last to know".
No plane hit The Pentagon !! A 777 sized plane is quite noticeable when it crashes !!.
No one noticed any plane crash - not even the CNN outside broadcast at the scene. So that was never aired again.
It was the alleged fan blade discovered in the Pentagon wreckage (as traced by part number to the Douglas A3-D Sky Warrior) that convinced me fishy things had gone on here. I then began taking a closer look at what our government, media types were saying, reporting, about the 9/11 disasters. I had worked on the Navy's version of the twin jet engine A-3 (KA-3B) Sky Warrior as a 3rd Class aviation electrician, c. '67-'68, during the Vietnam War. It was due to it's huge bomb bay many of these A-3s had been converted into refuelers, for use in inflight fueling of carrier-based attack aircraft in bombing missions over Nam. Some A-3s had also been converted into 'snoopers' and painted black, some sporting 'port holes' along it's length, apparently for viewing of it's onboard tech crew where the bomb bay would normally be. From my research, the Sky Warrior was initially designed in the 50s for either the Airforce or the Navy, depending on what source you read, apparently for delivering nuclear weapons in one-way flights to Russia should war break out with them. So it's not too hard to imagine that cruise-type missile systems could have been substituted in the bomb bay cavity later on, once active service of the A-3 for other duties had been phased out. Also, drone-type controls could have been installed as well, thereby allowing a repainted, remote-controlled 'airline look-alike', complete with port hole-style windows, to fly into the Pentagon on 9/11. The scant video evidence released by the government of the attack to-date is hardly dispositive of the matter. Mind, this is only a theory of mine, not based on fact. Others may yet find more evidence linking the A-3 to this role, and possibly proving, once and for all, what really did hit the Pentagon that day -- if not identifying the perps who actually did this.
For the 767 models in particular, a Boeing controls engineer alleged that there was a back-door access port to the control system, intended to be used for system test, and presumably on the ground. I heard no such allegations for the 757s, but he may not have worked on the 757 project.
There were only two planes, and none at WTC. Flight 77 that overflew the Pentagon and must have landed at Reagan - and UA 93 that was probably shot down.
www.citizeninvestigationteam.org (com?) do a terrific on site interview of people in Arlington who describe the flight path.
Thank you both for your commitment to truth. You gave an outstanding presentation in Corte Madera!
Blessings,
Ladd
Why did AIG pay Larry Silverstein $4billion of insurance money without an investigation? Perhaps that money was printed up by the Fed, under Rothschild orders.
Before we consider if the planes were remote controlled, lets consider if there even Were any planes. Can planes fly at altitudes of 800 feet without their wings being ripped off? What is the likelihood that pilots went "2 for 2" in succeeding in executing such difficult maneuvers to hit their targets? Wouldn't ANY plane hitting a structure with such a "THICK STEEL" outer skeleton literally crumple on the outside of the structure rather than appear to be absorbed into it as if it were a sponge? Then if the answers to all these questions still allow for a plane to do what it appears they did, then we can ask the question, 'if the planes may have been remote controlled.' If not, let's not try to create a new narrative which would only muddy the waters even more than the perpetrators of this event have been successful in doing.
Before we consider if the planes were remote controlled, lets consider if there even Were any planes. Can planes fly at altitudes of 800 feet without their wings being ripped off? What is the likelihood that pilots went "2 for 2" in succeeding in executing such difficult maneuvers to hit their targets? Wouldn't ANY plane hitting a structure with such a "THICK STEEL" outer skeleton literally crumple on the outside of the structure rather than appear to be absorbed into it as if it were a sponge? Then if the answers to all these questions still allow for a plane to do what it appears they did, then we can ask the question, 'if the planes may have been remote controlled.' If not, let's not try to create a new narrative which would only muddy the waters even more than the perpetrators of this event have been successful in doing.
I'm VERY skeptical of the "no planes" theories and consider them probable disinformation. If seen from certain angles in certain directions the fireball would be visible but not the impacting aircraft. I HEARD the impact of the second plane all the way from Brooklyn - the most horrible sound I've ever heard!
1700 bodies fragmented into 22,000 pieces, Another 1000 gone - not a trace of DNA. not a body fragment.
"Were the Planes Remotely Guided on 9/11?"
...... hmmm ...... What planes?
When a Boeing engineer was asked if their planes can fly at over 400 mph at sea level the immediate response was absolutely not. Commercial aircraft cannot sustain the measured speed of the vehicles that hit the WTC
Very likely there were no passengers on the aircraft, they were remotely controlled drones focussed on a homing signal from the towers. The Pentagon was hit by a missile with a hard tip.