There is only fake "evidence" that many of them were ever on board, nor even in USA ! Mohamed Atta I believe was. He might have been Murdered with all the other passengers after they made the impossible phone calls from a closed US airbase - Rebecca Roth.
His father said he worked for MOSSAF and that they killed him.
It’s almost as easy to photoshop video as it is ordinary photographs. The was no live TV viewing on the 9th only supposed private videos were available on the 10th with added dialogue and screams. Also, there was one impossible clip showing an intact cockpit emerging from the building. The videos also improved with time. On the video showing a road gang, that was swung over to the first tower to be hit, contained a plane that was ridiculously small, and grew larger in later versions.
Also, what happened to the engines? Only one engine as found but it was of the wrong make.
An aircraft overflew all the towers at precisely the right time, but at the Pentagon, without the city canyon effect, the idea failed. Four air craft crashes, with no luggage saved, one engine of the wrong sort, no bodies, the same scenario being enacted by the military on the same day, modern passenger aircraft being flown by amateurs. Only in the USA would people believe such rubbish.
What became of the passengers and crews of these four aircraft?
I can document in detail, including what I saw with my own eyes in a live TV broadcast from a news helicopter at an altitude around the tops of the towers, that the three collapsed buildings were brought down with demolition explosives. These HAD TO be placed in advance as such large building demolitions take weeks or months to set up. Conspiracy thus proven! The planes were probably diverted and landed at some secret military location, where all passengers were "disappeared." Remote controlled planes or drones were flown into the towers. Horrible to consider, but the 3000 killed in the towers was even more so. The very horror of this was part of the PSYOP - many people DON'T WANT to believe such things can and do happen, especially in America - so for their own psychological stability and comfort, they refuse to believe it.
Steel structures such as even a hundred baked bean cans soldered in a stack Do Not "collapse" !! And even if it was wet cardboard instead of steel it could Not possibly do so in freefall TIME. ( Not SPEED because there is no such thing as "free fall speed". Terminal ff speed yes.)
They went up like Gigantic Fireworks, right in full view.
- covering Manhattan in inches of incriminating dust containing steel microspheres. - and red_grey "chips of paint" - that coincidentally just happened to have a calorific value greater than TNT !
Yes absolutely. like the two or three? guys who had pointed out security problems with new computer software with Marsh &McClennans?, just happened to not get the "change of venue" notice, and perished along with the rest - which included John O'Neil the FBI inspector who's new job started that day. They moved him for investigating too much.
Christopher Bollyn's "Solving 9/11....." and Kevin Ryan's "Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects". Also you can get "The Corbett Report" for this. James Corbett - west coast Japan.
I've seen a rare few seconds of video that seemed to happen by chance when someone exiting the basement to street level with there camera running just happened to catch one of the fireball occurring- but no plane.
I now subscribe to the "No planes" It was all evidently photoshop video. Also there is not turbulene in the fireball which would be there had a huge plane just bee through the air a very split second beforehand. No Planes.
See Rebecca Roth "Methodical Illusion". The impossible phone calls were made from the landed planes !! After than I don't want to think about it. They likely told the people "it's a "practice drill", but make it sound real"
Not 4 crashes. 77 must have landed at Reagan just down the road, and 93 was probably shot down. Maybe it was empty ? Must have been, as you say. One rocket hit the First Tower. Nothing the second.
I saw one plane listed as "destroyed", and another as not having flown that day ?! So that leaves 3 planes.
77 definitely surviving plane overflow the Pentagon.
Yes ridiculously small ! I never saw the improved versions. zmore like a Cruise missile. The floors hit just happened to be those that had had the fireproofing on the steel "upgraded" the previous 5 years.
Captain Ed Toner was not only a retired jumbo jet pilot he was also a retired jumbo jet pilot instructor. He called up Boeing and id'd himself and asked if the 911 planes had equipment to override the pilots controls. They told him that information is classified. He remarked, "We would be the last to know".
Ain't that so. They failed to add to the pilots huge book/manual about the plane the supposed "anti stall" software in the autopilot which caused the two terrible crashes of BA's New planes a couple of years ago now. Took TWO identical crashes - C500 lives - to have them grounded.
It was the alleged fan blade discovered in the Pentagon wreckage (as traced by part number to the Douglas A3-D Sky Warrior) that convinced me fishy things had gone on here. I then began taking a closer look at what our government, media types were saying, reporting, about the 9/11 disasters. I had worked on the Navy's version of the twin jet engine A-3 (KA-3B) Sky Warrior as a 3rd Class aviation electrician, c. '67-'68, during the Vietnam War. It was due to it's huge bomb bay many of these A-3s had been converted into refuelers, for use in inflight fueling of carrier-based attack aircraft in bombing missions over Nam. Some A-3s had also been converted into 'snoopers' and painted black, some sporting 'port holes' along it's length, apparently for viewing of it's onboard tech crew where the bomb bay would normally be. From my research, the Sky Warrior was initially designed in the 50s for either the Airforce or the Navy, depending on what source you read, apparently for delivering nuclear weapons in one-way flights to Russia should war break out with them. So it's not too hard to imagine that cruise-type missile systems could have been substituted in the bomb bay cavity later on, once active service of the A-3 for other duties had been phased out. Also, drone-type controls could have been installed as well, thereby allowing a repainted, remote-controlled 'airline look-alike', complete with port hole-style windows, to fly into the Pentagon on 9/11. The scant video evidence released by the government of the attack to-date is hardly dispositive of the matter. Mind, this is only a theory of mine, not based on fact. Others may yet find more evidence linking the A-3 to this role, and possibly proving, once and for all, what really did hit the Pentagon that day -- if not identifying the perps who actually did this.
You mean the plane - which eye witness at Citgo said "started to lift" as it approached the Pentagon- let go a Bomb ? That makes sense of the otherwise very difficult timing required because the Citgo witness said " then it was hidden from view by the explosion"
Given that a Sky Warrior fan blade was allegedly found in the Pentagon wreckage, the missile or bomb within the bomb bay (if such a thing was in it) had to have gone into the building along with the plane. Not sure why there wasn't obvious evidence of where the Sky Warrior's two engines, or any plane's engines, had hit the building's façade, although the wing span of an A-3 is considerably less than that of a Boeing -- at least the one claimed to have done the deed. This difference in span may account for the discrepancy in damage. But the lack of more than one engine found in the debris field still perplexing, regardless.
Still there is one guy in the world who still believes he and his mates found 120? tons of scrap airliner liner distributed in there, that no one else noticed !
For the 767 models in particular, a Boeing controls engineer alleged that there was a back-door access port to the control system, intended to be used for system test, and presumably on the ground. I heard no such allegations for the 757s, but he may not have worked on the 757 project.
There were only two planes, and none at WTC. Flight 77 that overflew the Pentagon and must have landed at Reagan - and UA 93 that was probably shot down.
Why did AIG pay Larry Silverstein $4billion of insurance money without an investigation? Perhaps that money was printed up by the Fed, under Rothschild orders.
Before we consider if the planes were remote controlled, lets consider if there even Were any planes. Can planes fly at altitudes of 800 feet without their wings being ripped off? What is the likelihood that pilots went "2 for 2" in succeeding in executing such difficult maneuvers to hit their targets? Wouldn't ANY plane hitting a structure with such a "THICK STEEL" outer skeleton literally crumple on the outside of the structure rather than appear to be absorbed into it as if it were a sponge? Then if the answers to all these questions still allow for a plane to do what it appears they did, then we can ask the question, 'if the planes may have been remote controlled.' If not, let's not try to create a new narrative which would only muddy the waters even more than the perpetrators of this event have been successful in doing.
Before we consider if the planes were remote controlled, lets consider if there even Were any planes. Can planes fly at altitudes of 800 feet without their wings being ripped off? What is the likelihood that pilots went "2 for 2" in succeeding in executing such difficult maneuvers to hit their targets? Wouldn't ANY plane hitting a structure with such a "THICK STEEL" outer skeleton literally crumple on the outside of the structure rather than appear to be absorbed into it as if it were a sponge? Then if the answers to all these questions still allow for a plane to do what it appears they did, then we can ask the question, 'if the planes may have been remote controlled.' If not, let's not try to create a new narrative which would only muddy the waters even more than the perpetrators of this event have been successful in doing.
I'm VERY skeptical of the "no planes" theories and consider them probable disinformation. If seen from certain angles in certain directions the fireball would be visible but not the impacting aircraft. I HEARD the impact of the second plane all the way from Brooklyn - the most horrible sound I've ever heard!
When a Boeing engineer was asked if their planes can fly at over 400 mph at sea level the immediate response was absolutely not. Commercial aircraft cannot sustain the measured speed of the vehicles that hit the WTC
Very likely there were no passengers on the aircraft, they were remotely controlled drones focussed on a homing signal from the towers. The Pentagon was hit by a missile with a hard tip.
Since the alleged hijackers were still alive on September 12th 2001, the aircraft must have been remotely controlled.
There is only fake "evidence" that many of them were ever on board, nor even in USA ! Mohamed Atta I believe was. He might have been Murdered with all the other passengers after they made the impossible phone calls from a closed US airbase - Rebecca Roth.
His father said he worked for MOSSAF and that they killed him.
It’s almost as easy to photoshop video as it is ordinary photographs. The was no live TV viewing on the 9th only supposed private videos were available on the 10th with added dialogue and screams. Also, there was one impossible clip showing an intact cockpit emerging from the building. The videos also improved with time. On the video showing a road gang, that was swung over to the first tower to be hit, contained a plane that was ridiculously small, and grew larger in later versions.
Also, what happened to the engines? Only one engine as found but it was of the wrong make.
An aircraft overflew all the towers at precisely the right time, but at the Pentagon, without the city canyon effect, the idea failed. Four air craft crashes, with no luggage saved, one engine of the wrong sort, no bodies, the same scenario being enacted by the military on the same day, modern passenger aircraft being flown by amateurs. Only in the USA would people believe such rubbish.
What became of the passengers and crews of these four aircraft?
I can document in detail, including what I saw with my own eyes in a live TV broadcast from a news helicopter at an altitude around the tops of the towers, that the three collapsed buildings were brought down with demolition explosives. These HAD TO be placed in advance as such large building demolitions take weeks or months to set up. Conspiracy thus proven! The planes were probably diverted and landed at some secret military location, where all passengers were "disappeared." Remote controlled planes or drones were flown into the towers. Horrible to consider, but the 3000 killed in the towers was even more so. The very horror of this was part of the PSYOP - many people DON'T WANT to believe such things can and do happen, especially in America - so for their own psychological stability and comfort, they refuse to believe it.
Steel structures such as even a hundred baked bean cans soldered in a stack Do Not "collapse" !! And even if it was wet cardboard instead of steel it could Not possibly do so in freefall TIME. ( Not SPEED because there is no such thing as "free fall speed". Terminal ff speed yes.)
They went up like Gigantic Fireworks, right in full view.
- covering Manhattan in inches of incriminating dust containing steel microspheres. - and red_grey "chips of paint" - that coincidentally just happened to have a calorific value greater than TNT !
Yes absolutely. like the two or three? guys who had pointed out security problems with new computer software with Marsh &McClennans?, just happened to not get the "change of venue" notice, and perished along with the rest - which included John O'Neil the FBI inspector who's new job started that day. They moved him for investigating too much.
Christopher Bollyn's "Solving 9/11....." and Kevin Ryan's "Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects". Also you can get "The Corbett Report" for this. James Corbett - west coast Japan.
I've seen a rare few seconds of video that seemed to happen by chance when someone exiting the basement to street level with there camera running just happened to catch one of the fireball occurring- but no plane.
I now subscribe to the "No planes" It was all evidently photoshop video. Also there is not turbulene in the fireball which would be there had a huge plane just bee through the air a very split second beforehand. No Planes.
See Rebecca Roth "Methodical Illusion". The impossible phone calls were made from the landed planes !! After than I don't want to think about it. They likely told the people "it's a "practice drill", but make it sound real"
Not 4 crashes. 77 must have landed at Reagan just down the road, and 93 was probably shot down. Maybe it was empty ? Must have been, as you say. One rocket hit the First Tower. Nothing the second.
I saw one plane listed as "destroyed", and another as not having flown that day ?! So that leaves 3 planes.
77 definitely surviving plane overflow the Pentagon.
175 landed and did the phone calls
93 shot down (Pilot jailed - Susan Lindauer).
Yes ridiculously small ! I never saw the improved versions. zmore like a Cruise missile. The floors hit just happened to be those that had had the fireproofing on the steel "upgraded" the previous 5 years.
Captain Ed Toner was not only a retired jumbo jet pilot he was also a retired jumbo jet pilot instructor. He called up Boeing and id'd himself and asked if the 911 planes had equipment to override the pilots controls. They told him that information is classified. He remarked, "We would be the last to know".
Ain't that so. They failed to add to the pilots huge book/manual about the plane the supposed "anti stall" software in the autopilot which caused the two terrible crashes of BA's New planes a couple of years ago now. Took TWO identical crashes - C500 lives - to have them grounded.
We are being ruled by mindless psychotic scum.
No plane hit The Pentagon !! A 777 sized plane is quite noticeable when it crashes !!.
No one noticed any plane crash - not even the CNN outside broadcast at the scene. So that was never aired again.
It was the alleged fan blade discovered in the Pentagon wreckage (as traced by part number to the Douglas A3-D Sky Warrior) that convinced me fishy things had gone on here. I then began taking a closer look at what our government, media types were saying, reporting, about the 9/11 disasters. I had worked on the Navy's version of the twin jet engine A-3 (KA-3B) Sky Warrior as a 3rd Class aviation electrician, c. '67-'68, during the Vietnam War. It was due to it's huge bomb bay many of these A-3s had been converted into refuelers, for use in inflight fueling of carrier-based attack aircraft in bombing missions over Nam. Some A-3s had also been converted into 'snoopers' and painted black, some sporting 'port holes' along it's length, apparently for viewing of it's onboard tech crew where the bomb bay would normally be. From my research, the Sky Warrior was initially designed in the 50s for either the Airforce or the Navy, depending on what source you read, apparently for delivering nuclear weapons in one-way flights to Russia should war break out with them. So it's not too hard to imagine that cruise-type missile systems could have been substituted in the bomb bay cavity later on, once active service of the A-3 for other duties had been phased out. Also, drone-type controls could have been installed as well, thereby allowing a repainted, remote-controlled 'airline look-alike', complete with port hole-style windows, to fly into the Pentagon on 9/11. The scant video evidence released by the government of the attack to-date is hardly dispositive of the matter. Mind, this is only a theory of mine, not based on fact. Others may yet find more evidence linking the A-3 to this role, and possibly proving, once and for all, what really did hit the Pentagon that day -- if not identifying the perps who actually did this.
You mean the plane - which eye witness at Citgo said "started to lift" as it approached the Pentagon- let go a Bomb ? That makes sense of the otherwise very difficult timing required because the Citgo witness said " then it was hidden from view by the explosion"
www.citizeninvestigationteam.org or com?
Given that a Sky Warrior fan blade was allegedly found in the Pentagon wreckage, the missile or bomb within the bomb bay (if such a thing was in it) had to have gone into the building along with the plane. Not sure why there wasn't obvious evidence of where the Sky Warrior's two engines, or any plane's engines, had hit the building's façade, although the wing span of an A-3 is considerably less than that of a Boeing -- at least the one claimed to have done the deed. This difference in span may account for the discrepancy in damage. But the lack of more than one engine found in the debris field still perplexing, regardless.
Perplexing ? - Case closed I'd say !
Still there is one guy in the world who still believes he and his mates found 120? tons of scrap airliner liner distributed in there, that no one else noticed !
Must have been placed there by conspiracy theorists, who then walked off with the 120 tons of wreckage ?
For the 767 models in particular, a Boeing controls engineer alleged that there was a back-door access port to the control system, intended to be used for system test, and presumably on the ground. I heard no such allegations for the 757s, but he may not have worked on the 757 project.
Dov Zakeim (Comptroller at Pentagon) is the creator of a Remote landing system. Supposedly for Hijack events. What could possibly go wrong !
He disappeared along with the 2.3 Trillion Drumsgeld spoke of the day before. Not that it was in his suitcase, it was un accounted for expenses.
There were only two planes, and none at WTC. Flight 77 that overflew the Pentagon and must have landed at Reagan - and UA 93 that was probably shot down.
www.citizeninvestigationteam.org (com?) do a terrific on site interview of people in Arlington who describe the flight path.
Thank you both for your commitment to truth. You gave an outstanding presentation in Corte Madera!
Blessings,
Ladd
Why did AIG pay Larry Silverstein $4billion of insurance money without an investigation? Perhaps that money was printed up by the Fed, under Rothschild orders.
Before we consider if the planes were remote controlled, lets consider if there even Were any planes. Can planes fly at altitudes of 800 feet without their wings being ripped off? What is the likelihood that pilots went "2 for 2" in succeeding in executing such difficult maneuvers to hit their targets? Wouldn't ANY plane hitting a structure with such a "THICK STEEL" outer skeleton literally crumple on the outside of the structure rather than appear to be absorbed into it as if it were a sponge? Then if the answers to all these questions still allow for a plane to do what it appears they did, then we can ask the question, 'if the planes may have been remote controlled.' If not, let's not try to create a new narrative which would only muddy the waters even more than the perpetrators of this event have been successful in doing.
Before we consider if the planes were remote controlled, lets consider if there even Were any planes. Can planes fly at altitudes of 800 feet without their wings being ripped off? What is the likelihood that pilots went "2 for 2" in succeeding in executing such difficult maneuvers to hit their targets? Wouldn't ANY plane hitting a structure with such a "THICK STEEL" outer skeleton literally crumple on the outside of the structure rather than appear to be absorbed into it as if it were a sponge? Then if the answers to all these questions still allow for a plane to do what it appears they did, then we can ask the question, 'if the planes may have been remote controlled.' If not, let's not try to create a new narrative which would only muddy the waters even more than the perpetrators of this event have been successful in doing.
I'm VERY skeptical of the "no planes" theories and consider them probable disinformation. If seen from certain angles in certain directions the fireball would be visible but not the impacting aircraft. I HEARD the impact of the second plane all the way from Brooklyn - the most horrible sound I've ever heard!
1700 bodies fragmented into 22,000 pieces, Another 1000 gone - not a trace of DNA. not a body fragment.
"Were the Planes Remotely Guided on 9/11?"
...... hmmm ...... What planes?
When a Boeing engineer was asked if their planes can fly at over 400 mph at sea level the immediate response was absolutely not. Commercial aircraft cannot sustain the measured speed of the vehicles that hit the WTC
Very likely there were no passengers on the aircraft, they were remotely controlled drones focussed on a homing signal from the towers. The Pentagon was hit by a missile with a hard tip.