Of course, it was no coincidence that Little Johnny Howard was in Washington on the fateful day - every man and his dog was in on 9/11. Nor was the calendar of events preceding the November 10, 2001 Australian Federal election unplanned.
August - Tampa affair (completely staged)
September - 9/11 (completely staged apart from the building destructions)
October - "Children overboard" (completely staged)
BANG! BANG! BANG! election! Liberal victory - smoother sailing for Australian troops into Afghanistan and Iraq - with the complicity of Labor opposition leader, Kim Beazley. He was in on it too with the promise of good things to come ...
Professorial fellow at UWA, Ambassador to the US, Governor of WA
Watch the film very deliberately named Leaky Boat made by Screen Australia/Screen West - underneath the propaganda it tells the truth of the staging of the ludicrous refugee boat stories sandwiching 9/11, all leading up to the Federal election.
As David says, the official story is absurd. It falls over at every single turn ... that's the way they made it - they made it even more absurd than it needed to be because propaganda works better the less it corresponds with reality and they can derive more enjoyment from laying on the ridiculousness more and more and more and more. The Big Lie works better than the small lie, that's just the way it works and those in power have very well-placed supreme confidence in the Big Lie because they've used it on us for centuries, millennia even and it's never failed them ... even once.
9/11 is simply awash with propaganda (both for and against the terrorist narrative) and what needs to be done is to focus on the elemental facts, namely:
--- No passenger airliner crashed which means terrorists had nothing to do with anything and none of the alleged passengers died in a plane
--- The building destructions were all controlled ... so obvious
--- All the evidence put forward for death and injury easily fits the category of "pseudo-evidence" - there is nothing to say that the World Trade Centre and the West Wing of the Pentagon weren't completely evacuated before destruction of the buildings, after all, no deaths or injuries were reported in WTCs 4, 5 and 6 which were pretty heavily damaged so why did deaths need to occur in WTCs 1, 2 and 3?
www.bigeye.org/911.htm
Who, What, Why and When:
http://911truthawakenings.org/OpenLettertoNRA.htm
Richard, did you censor my comment on Israel? Or was it because of the Vision link?
Of course, it was no coincidence that Little Johnny Howard was in Washington on the fateful day - every man and his dog was in on 9/11. Nor was the calendar of events preceding the November 10, 2001 Australian Federal election unplanned.
August - Tampa affair (completely staged)
September - 9/11 (completely staged apart from the building destructions)
October - "Children overboard" (completely staged)
BANG! BANG! BANG! election! Liberal victory - smoother sailing for Australian troops into Afghanistan and Iraq - with the complicity of Labor opposition leader, Kim Beazley. He was in on it too with the promise of good things to come ...
Professorial fellow at UWA, Ambassador to the US, Governor of WA
Watch the film very deliberately named Leaky Boat made by Screen Australia/Screen West - underneath the propaganda it tells the truth of the staging of the ludicrous refugee boat stories sandwiching 9/11, all leading up to the Federal election.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ccKArhv28U
As David says, the official story is absurd. It falls over at every single turn ... that's the way they made it - they made it even more absurd than it needed to be because propaganda works better the less it corresponds with reality and they can derive more enjoyment from laying on the ridiculousness more and more and more and more. The Big Lie works better than the small lie, that's just the way it works and those in power have very well-placed supreme confidence in the Big Lie because they've used it on us for centuries, millennia even and it's never failed them ... even once.
9/11 is simply awash with propaganda (both for and against the terrorist narrative) and what needs to be done is to focus on the elemental facts, namely:
--- No passenger airliner crashed which means terrorists had nothing to do with anything and none of the alleged passengers died in a plane
--- The building destructions were all controlled ... so obvious
--- All the evidence put forward for death and injury easily fits the category of "pseudo-evidence" - there is nothing to say that the World Trade Centre and the West Wing of the Pentagon weren't completely evacuated before destruction of the buildings, after all, no deaths or injuries were reported in WTCs 4, 5 and 6 which were pretty heavily damaged so why did deaths need to occur in WTCs 1, 2 and 3?