It's a shame that health professionals who resoundingly refute the scientific work done to show isolation of the alleged virus, its cytotoxic effects (ability to kill cells) and the sequencing of its genome were not among those at the conference (correct me if I'm wrong). In the 7-hour video series made by Michael Wallach and Diarra Leslie, health professionals show how the sciences of both virology and vaccinology are founded on fraudulent scientific methods which have simply been perpetuated since Pasteur and Jenner, culminating in the fraud that is the covid pandemic ... and now monkeypox and on and on and on and on.
Andrew Kaufman, MD; Tom Cowan, MD; Stefan Lanka, Virologist; Torsten Engelbrecht, journalist; Claus Kohnlein, MD; Kevin Corbett, PhD RN; David Rasnick, Biochemist PhD; Mark Bailey, MD; Dawn Lester and David Parker, Authors; Stefano Scoglio, Biochemist PhD; Saeed Qureeshi, Chemist PhD; Celia Farber, Journalist; Harald Walach, PhD; Pam Popper, PhD, ND; Charles Geshekter, PhD; Amandha Vollmer ND, Jim West, Author; Larry Palevsky MD; and more.
The most important similarity between covid and 9/11 is that they employ the strategy of implementing two major propaganda streams targeted to:
--- the majority who they know will be easy victims of the Emperor's New Clothes effect
--- those who don't believe them
It's very important to realise that in big psyops they target those who won't believe them as much as those who will.
There is no distinctive illness covid and there is no virus, sars-cov-2. They are both completely made up and I knew they were from Day One because the signs of a psyop were immediately apparent with completely nonsensical images of people laid out on hospital floors and falling flat on their faces and claims of the virus being found in particular species of snake.
In psyops, they do what they want for real and fake the rest.
In psyops, they do what they want for real and fake the rest.
In psyops, they do what they want for real and fake the rest.
Things work so very much better when you do a psyop like that. Psyops are NOT about simulating reality as well as possible and doing things for real if you can. No, no, no, no, no. They're about smoke'n'mirrors propaganda so very easily exposed once you blow away the propaganda dust. There are so very many instances where they could do a thing for real to make their psyop more convincing if they wanted to but they don't. They are scrupulous in that way if that is the correct term. They always - or almost always - make their deception clear underneath the propaganda.
I knew they only wanted us to believe in a virus, they didn't want a virus and a real virus wouldn't work for their narrative. You cannot control a pathogen by airborne spreading.
Just as covid is a figment, a phantom, simply a "diagnosis" based on a fraudulent test, where we can see all death and illness ascribed to it has other explanations, 9/11 was not the work of terrorists but nor was it a "false flag" per se. It was simply a massive Full-Scale Anti-Terrorist Exercise comprising numerous smaller exercises and drills (many of which we were informed but a crucial few we weren't such as those producing the images of the injured) pushed out as a real event.
The only physical reality was damage to and destruction of buildings. The planes were faked as were death and injury. A few people may have died or been injured but there is not a single skerrick of visual evidence that favours real death and injury over fake.
Think about it. According to the imagery, WTC-6 was massively damaged by the destruction of the twin towers and other WTC buildings also looked quite damaged. The people in those buildings would have had to be evacuated before the twin towers came down. Who would have done the evacuations and would the evacuators be OK with evacuating those buildings while not evacuating the twin towers? No they wouldn't.
From every angle you look at death and injury on 9/11, fake favours real every single time.
Some people argue that the perps would have happily murdered the people in the buildings because they didn't care about them. This is a strawman argument. I'd never argue that they didn't kill them because they cared about them - look at the unconscionable way they're maiming and murdering people with the jab. I cannot believe it. No, the reasons they didn't murder people on 9/11 was they didn't need to to make us believe they did and they would have had to involve too many people. They can persuade health professionals and the general population alike that we are in mortal danger of a virus and the jab is safe and effective (despite the obvious evidence showing people being maimed and killed in not inconsequential numbers and no particular efficacy) but you cannot use propaganda to baldly persuade demolition professionals that leaving buildings unevacuated is OK.
This is outstanding. Thank you all for sharing the best truth you can!
The sleepers awake!
It's a shame that health professionals who resoundingly refute the scientific work done to show isolation of the alleged virus, its cytotoxic effects (ability to kill cells) and the sequencing of its genome were not among those at the conference (correct me if I'm wrong). In the 7-hour video series made by Michael Wallach and Diarra Leslie, health professionals show how the sciences of both virology and vaccinology are founded on fraudulent scientific methods which have simply been perpetuated since Pasteur and Jenner, culminating in the fraud that is the covid pandemic ... and now monkeypox and on and on and on and on.
Andrew Kaufman, MD; Tom Cowan, MD; Stefan Lanka, Virologist; Torsten Engelbrecht, journalist; Claus Kohnlein, MD; Kevin Corbett, PhD RN; David Rasnick, Biochemist PhD; Mark Bailey, MD; Dawn Lester and David Parker, Authors; Stefano Scoglio, Biochemist PhD; Saeed Qureeshi, Chemist PhD; Celia Farber, Journalist; Harald Walach, PhD; Pam Popper, PhD, ND; Charles Geshekter, PhD; Amandha Vollmer ND, Jim West, Author; Larry Palevsky MD; and more.
https://truthcomestolight.com/the-viral-delusion-2022-docu-series-the-tragic-pseudoscience-of-sars-cov2-the-madness-of-modern-virology/
The most important similarity between covid and 9/11 is that they employ the strategy of implementing two major propaganda streams targeted to:
--- the majority who they know will be easy victims of the Emperor's New Clothes effect
--- those who don't believe them
It's very important to realise that in big psyops they target those who won't believe them as much as those who will.
There is no distinctive illness covid and there is no virus, sars-cov-2. They are both completely made up and I knew they were from Day One because the signs of a psyop were immediately apparent with completely nonsensical images of people laid out on hospital floors and falling flat on their faces and claims of the virus being found in particular species of snake.
In psyops, they do what they want for real and fake the rest.
In psyops, they do what they want for real and fake the rest.
In psyops, they do what they want for real and fake the rest.
Things work so very much better when you do a psyop like that. Psyops are NOT about simulating reality as well as possible and doing things for real if you can. No, no, no, no, no. They're about smoke'n'mirrors propaganda so very easily exposed once you blow away the propaganda dust. There are so very many instances where they could do a thing for real to make their psyop more convincing if they wanted to but they don't. They are scrupulous in that way if that is the correct term. They always - or almost always - make their deception clear underneath the propaganda.
I knew they only wanted us to believe in a virus, they didn't want a virus and a real virus wouldn't work for their narrative. You cannot control a pathogen by airborne spreading.
Just as covid is a figment, a phantom, simply a "diagnosis" based on a fraudulent test, where we can see all death and illness ascribed to it has other explanations, 9/11 was not the work of terrorists but nor was it a "false flag" per se. It was simply a massive Full-Scale Anti-Terrorist Exercise comprising numerous smaller exercises and drills (many of which we were informed but a crucial few we weren't such as those producing the images of the injured) pushed out as a real event.
The only physical reality was damage to and destruction of buildings. The planes were faked as were death and injury. A few people may have died or been injured but there is not a single skerrick of visual evidence that favours real death and injury over fake.
Think about it. According to the imagery, WTC-6 was massively damaged by the destruction of the twin towers and other WTC buildings also looked quite damaged. The people in those buildings would have had to be evacuated before the twin towers came down. Who would have done the evacuations and would the evacuators be OK with evacuating those buildings while not evacuating the twin towers? No they wouldn't.
From every angle you look at death and injury on 9/11, fake favours real every single time.
Some people argue that the perps would have happily murdered the people in the buildings because they didn't care about them. This is a strawman argument. I'd never argue that they didn't kill them because they cared about them - look at the unconscionable way they're maiming and murdering people with the jab. I cannot believe it. No, the reasons they didn't murder people on 9/11 was they didn't need to to make us believe they did and they would have had to involve too many people. They can persuade health professionals and the general population alike that we are in mortal danger of a virus and the jab is safe and effective (despite the obvious evidence showing people being maimed and killed in not inconsequential numbers and no particular efficacy) but you cannot use propaganda to baldly persuade demolition professionals that leaving buildings unevacuated is OK.