Excellent interview. And polite. Wayne Coste responded to an email from me, once, many on the receiving end, and said something -to "quote" him about "my beloved missile theory" - kind of an angry tone, too - whereas, I responded that I have NEVER said anywhere on the NET anything supporting a missile theory. Worst thing in a 'discussion' (aside from unnecessary anger), is people putting words on your mouth.
Wayne hasn't answered me yet (MESSENGER) about column 14 - silence is golden.
It offends me to see your question about why Eisenberg is coming forward on the 20th anniversary of 9/11. He explained that he was forced to sign a nondisclosure "agreement" upon being deployed to the Pentagon clean-up. That certainly chills a person's speech! Finding now that the government itself has no copy of that document--and is denying he was even AT the Pentagon--he has appropriately come forward. It took immense courage and all of us owe him our heartfelt thanks.
I wrote another comment before subscribing, which it appears I have to now reconstruct, since it has vanished into the ether. In a nutshell, this man is utterly credible, as not only a fact witness but an expert in the identification of airplane parts. He has real evidence which completely undermines the official narrative about a "plane crashing into the Pentagon" (not to mention completely undermining the Coste/Chandler construct, which--although based on no physical evidence--you are, inexplicably, still planning to feature on your March 19th show!) THERE WAS NO PLANE, as many of us have maintained for YEARS.
What we must now examine is the types of intense energy sources that could not only have caused the extensive damage to the building, but MELTED THAT MAN TO HIS CHAIR.
Hi Richard, I wanted to follow up on my comment tonight. The American Airlines pilot, Charles Burlingame III graduated USNA in '71. Active Duty on USS Saratoga '76 - '79. Flew F4 Phantom. Attended Top Gun School; Was called back to Active Duty at the Pentagon. '90-'91 during 1st Gulf War. Where he was photographed standing beside a scale model of the Pentagon that sat on a table. USNA grads almost always gain a Security Clearance. He returned to AA after that, and was still in the USNR when 9-11 occurred. I suspect he was either involved in the operation, and landed Flt 11 @ Cleveland Intl during the FAA Ground Stop chaos or was set up as a patsy, because there is No Way a couple skinny hijackers would be able to disable him and 1st Officer with box cutters. There are other anomalies. 757's cannot fly very fast @ sea level, only at cruising altitude where the air is thin. Aviation is a passion of mine, though I am not a pilot. Cheers.
Excellent interview. And polite. Wayne Coste responded to an email from me, once, many on the receiving end, and said something -to "quote" him about "my beloved missile theory" - kind of an angry tone, too - whereas, I responded that I have NEVER said anywhere on the NET anything supporting a missile theory. Worst thing in a 'discussion' (aside from unnecessary anger), is people putting words on your mouth.
Wayne hasn't answered me yet (MESSENGER) about column 14 - silence is golden.
It offends me to see your question about why Eisenberg is coming forward on the 20th anniversary of 9/11. He explained that he was forced to sign a nondisclosure "agreement" upon being deployed to the Pentagon clean-up. That certainly chills a person's speech! Finding now that the government itself has no copy of that document--and is denying he was even AT the Pentagon--he has appropriately come forward. It took immense courage and all of us owe him our heartfelt thanks.
I wrote another comment before subscribing, which it appears I have to now reconstruct, since it has vanished into the ether. In a nutshell, this man is utterly credible, as not only a fact witness but an expert in the identification of airplane parts. He has real evidence which completely undermines the official narrative about a "plane crashing into the Pentagon" (not to mention completely undermining the Coste/Chandler construct, which--although based on no physical evidence--you are, inexplicably, still planning to feature on your March 19th show!) THERE WAS NO PLANE, as many of us have maintained for YEARS.
What we must now examine is the types of intense energy sources that could not only have caused the extensive damage to the building, but MELTED THAT MAN TO HIS CHAIR.
Hi Richard, I wanted to follow up on my comment tonight. The American Airlines pilot, Charles Burlingame III graduated USNA in '71. Active Duty on USS Saratoga '76 - '79. Flew F4 Phantom. Attended Top Gun School; Was called back to Active Duty at the Pentagon. '90-'91 during 1st Gulf War. Where he was photographed standing beside a scale model of the Pentagon that sat on a table. USNA grads almost always gain a Security Clearance. He returned to AA after that, and was still in the USNR when 9-11 occurred. I suspect he was either involved in the operation, and landed Flt 11 @ Cleveland Intl during the FAA Ground Stop chaos or was set up as a patsy, because there is No Way a couple skinny hijackers would be able to disable him and 1st Officer with box cutters. There are other anomalies. 757's cannot fly very fast @ sea level, only at cruising altitude where the air is thin. Aviation is a passion of mine, though I am not a pilot. Cheers.