It will be interesting to see if Carlson has the go ahead to discuss Bldg 7 . He has limits . Shortly after 9/11 Fox put on 4 night program discussing 9/11 and Israel’s fore knowledge. It was Bret Hume ,Carl Cameron and the late Tony Snow which remains in cyber space . Google , Bret Hume , 9/11 and you will see a much younger Bret Hume discussing the 140 Israeli spies that were arrested BEFORE 9/11 and to corroborate that , Google , 5 dancing Israelis . That day 5 Israeli agents were arrested by the Bergen County police and turned over to the FBI and admitted that they were sent over to record the event. One other thing , after the Fox News report Bush said ,” evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11
is classified “ ! Hence the 29 pages which were never released. Every word of the above you can take to the bank !
... plus the fake moon landing. So all the presidential candidates are captured by big Corporations and the military Industrial Complex. Americans have all they need to wake up from over a century of government deception, terrorism and lies but I'm not optimistic.
Gray , I didn’t get it all . I did see in Israeli TV that 2 of agents said that they were sent over to record the event . That raises a.whole bunch of questions like , when we’re the tickets bought, who paid for the tickets , what were their instructions, where did they stay in the US , another agent ?
i met Israeli in Nevada City Ca who told me they are on TV as celebrity back home 20 + years i ws in nYC found warning on BBS bathroom wall minutes after from night before
Considering what Tucker has put on air consistently for at least a few years now it really is remarkable he's still on TV even though he easily brings in the highest ratings now. This is a very good interview, and any critics of Tucker really should reevaluate what they support if they think he's not simply the only TV journalist with a backbone and high integrity. Could he do Bldg 7? He did get in a segment about all the sudden deaths happening after 'vaccine' rollout, and now he had Ed Dowd on his long format show. Frankly, the crimes of the scamdemic, which admittedly were able to take place because of the 9/11 propaganda and cover-up, are far more relevant and far bigger and more important right now. If he can do those stories more then maybe the taboo of 9/11 truth breaks down even more.
I agree with you. As more time passes since 9/11, the more, I doubt the official narrative that we’ve been spoon-fed. What bolsters my doubts about the 9/11 narrative are the fact that we’ve also been, in my opinion, lied to, and misled about the murders of JFK, RFK, MLK, and Malcolm X. Especially after three years of lies, misinformation, dis- information about the Wuhan virus, it’s origins, and especially about the experimental, mRNA injections. I can simply not believe anything that comes out of “official“ government, outlets, and organs. That’s a sad commentary.
9-11 was a necessary steping stone to set the foundation for the current scamdemic. The lattr is he logical extension of the former. God Bless Richard and Gail for all their hard ork over the past 2 decades. I tip my hat.
Trump wouldn’t live long if he were to blow the whistle. A tragic accident would befall him . Look what happpend to the Kennedys when JFK said ,” I would break up the CIA and cast it to the winds “ . Israel would not have gotten nukes or expanded under the Kennedys. Bobby was assasinations right after he won his first primary. The message , don’t cross the govt.
I am a fan of Mr Carlson and his enlightening program. My concern is with the (low intelligence seeming) outbursts of laughs from him that emanate over incredulous statements. I am inclined to believe that Tucker has a neurological error that prompts these childish outbursts. I will continue to watch his segments while I try to ignore the inappropriate shows of mental aberrations.
Probably a learned response to conflict as opposed to neurologic damage. He openly confessed to being a former "drinker" and experienced a troublesome childhood. I found the interview largely in Tucker's favor as he answered questions with humility and humbleness.
I have always wondered, Richard, why, when you had this incredible opportunity, the woman asked you, she showed in her voice and manner that she was incredulous about it and you went off on a large explanation, droning on [with truth of course] when you ought to have focused her attention and had here further explain why she was so shocked by this TRUTH. Maybe it all could have ended way back then.
I understand your position, you wanted to get as much info as possible in the short time the media always gives, but the focus SHOULD ALWAYS BE on the TOTAL IMPOSSIBILITIES OF THE USGs' Official 9/11 Conspiracy Theory. Joe and Joess Q Public can't process all the data and all the science but we must HAVE THEM FOCUS ON THE TOTAL IMPOSSIBILITIES of the US Governments' Fairy Tale.
He did a flawless job making the case for controlled demolition. Both newscasters understood everything he was telling them and reflected and reinforced the key ideas for the audience. Both Richard and the interviewers did an excellent job. I wonder what's happened to those two reporters in the intervening years. For you to suggest that the 911 deception and controversy could have ended all those years ago if Richard had just focussed on her shock is not only false but ludicrous.
I didn't say Richard did a bad/lousy/... job, I offered some constructive criticism which I hope will be helpful in the future. When one gets a reaction like that lady/media person offered, which was shock, let that person have the floor, because what "conspiracy theorists" [again, no slight intended, what the usa governments have done to marginalize scientists and academics] have to say doesn't carry as much weight as a newscaster who could have said things like, "if that is the case and there is evidence for it, then this is a whole new ballgame!!" And other such like things.
We all make mistakes, I know my own in my own field and I can accept that I could have done a better job. I doubt Richard is so fragile that he can't listen to constructive criticism.
I, of course, meant in the Fox News interview with the man and the woman. Why didn't you ask them to follow up on WTC7 freefall. How in the world can "news" people hear about such a complete impossibility and not take it any further? Why haven't you taken it further? Why not ask them, the Fox news duo, why they failed to wonder why FEMA, who ACTUALLY did the study of the molten/vaporized WTCs 1, 2 & 7 steel, are not asking NIST why NIST is calling them liars by NIST denying the existence of MOLTEN STEEL!!???
Why Fox News didn't/doesn't ask the NYTs why they dropped the ball after they had published at length about the FEMA study of the molten/vaporized WTCs 1, 2 & 7 steel and the denial of NIST that that molten/vaporized WTCs 1, 2 & 7 steel even exists?!!!??
I am a nonconsensual subject in Darpa brain initiative. I have been implanted and tortured for a decade. I have Elon Musk's Neuralink and am being tortured with it. Thousands of Americans are being chipped and harmed and forcedd to death for brain wave data and AI. Obama started and to hide he passed law covering his crimes and labeling his victims crazy. https://t.co/4b6L4nKw3e
You've only made half a point. Without comparison to other collapses or the expectations of fundamental physics, a low (or high) seismic reading tells us nothing. There are also potential confounding factors -- basement levels vs. concrete slab, etc. Corroboration of the reading/measurement is also needed. At this point, I don't see anything alarming about this particular seismic event.
Building 7 collapsed due to structural failure. I know, it's boring. It's far more exciting to think it was some super secret controlled demolition with mysterious strangers and shady people 'predicting' that the building was going to collapse.
Late last night I read your post regarding Dr. Bhakdi. I hadn't checked on the present condition of Princess Bajrakitiyabha in the past week or so. Being that there's scant information about her present condition I'm assuming she's still on full life-support. As for Dr. Bhakdi, certainly a heartfelt few moments for him. I pray he's got good security attending him.
As for Tucker Carlson, I guess we'll all see what transpires, won't we?
Reading your post regarding Tucker, I recall an interview Patrick Bet David had with Richard Gage back in October last year. I was late in listening/watching that interview, seeing it in late November. I was rather astonished Patrick Bet David could not come to grips with even the slightest remote possibility that our own "govern - ment" was fully in on the act and IS fully in on the cover-up. Patrick's reasoning? Something of that magnitude, somebody in the gang is ALWAYS gonna spill the beans. Patrick was unequivocal in his opinion. My own immediate thought was : Patrick wake up! Ghislaine Maxwell has already begun serving her sentence related to her case and there's, mysteriously, no client list revealed? Nobody has confessed any-thing regarding that case.
I was tempted to E-mail Patrick, yet I don't regularly regularly listen/watch his content, so I didn't. Perhaps I should have?
Interestingly on one of Ron Paul's episodes last week, Dr. Paul (again) declared he could not bring himself to believe the entire COVID psy-op was/is entirely manufactured to serve manifold ends. Dr. Paul's reasoning? He unabashedly stated : "I just can't believe there are people in the world that are that evil."
In the earliest days of the global scam-demic psy-op I quickly lost count of how many times I heard the exact same, or some variation of, statement as Dr. Paul's.
My immediate unequivocal response to such "reasoning" was and remains : Let us refamiliarize ourselves with Sacred Holy Scripture known as the Holy Bible. To preclude and be clear, I am far, FAR, from being any saint. Let's just say I'm a jagged piece of clay in formation. Even so I encourage anybody (including Patrick Bet David and Dr. Paul) to read some particular passages/teachings in the New Testament. What was one of the three temptations the devil proposed to the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ? MATT. 4: 8 - 10 : Again the devil took him up into a very high mountain, and shewed him all the kingdoms of the world , and the glory of them,
9. And said to him : All these will I give them, if falling down thou wilt adore me.
10. Then Jesus saith to him : Begone, Satan : for it is written, The Lord thy God shalt thou adore, and him only shalt thou serve. (DOUAY-RHEIMS).
Among several messages/teachings in those few verses it begets an all important and poignant question, does it not? How many have taken the devil's/Satan's command in order to gain/obtain what he offered to Jesus? Isn't the same temptation just as real today as when Jesus walked the earth amongst us? IMO, indeed it is. As it has been through all time. I'll leave everybody else to their own contemplation.
Whatever truth you have in your post, 9/11 R, and I am not judging it one way or the other, you lose credibility by repeat posting the same thing. Have you any actual evidence? Have you something that describes what the seismic reading ought to be? Does the renowned French Professor, name escapes me now, Rousseau?? says anything about your point? Come to think about it, he does.
It will be interesting to see if Carlson has the go ahead to discuss Bldg 7 . He has limits . Shortly after 9/11 Fox put on 4 night program discussing 9/11 and Israel’s fore knowledge. It was Bret Hume ,Carl Cameron and the late Tony Snow which remains in cyber space . Google , Bret Hume , 9/11 and you will see a much younger Bret Hume discussing the 140 Israeli spies that were arrested BEFORE 9/11 and to corroborate that , Google , 5 dancing Israelis . That day 5 Israeli agents were arrested by the Bergen County police and turned over to the FBI and admitted that they were sent over to record the event. One other thing , after the Fox News report Bush said ,” evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11
is classified “ ! Hence the 29 pages which were never released. Every word of the above you can take to the bank !
SC
Sam C
Trump should expose 9/11 too. But I bet he won't.
he's afraid he know the jfzKmlKrfKillerjrs2 hold hid card sin front pocket is real Larry Silverstein Nixons knew Jacob Rubinstein too
... plus the fake moon landing. So all the presidential candidates are captured by big Corporations and the military Industrial Complex. Americans have all they need to wake up from over a century of government deception, terrorism and lies but I'm not optimistic.
met a man from Israel said their on tv and famous Brad Pittiless dopplegangbangers
Gray , I didn’t get it all . I did see in Israeli TV that 2 of agents said that they were sent over to record the event . That raises a.whole bunch of questions like , when we’re the tickets bought, who paid for the tickets , what were their instructions, where did they stay in the US , another agent ?
i met Israeli in Nevada City Ca who told me they are on TV as celebrity back home 20 + years i ws in nYC found warning on BBS bathroom wall minutes after from night before
Considering what Tucker has put on air consistently for at least a few years now it really is remarkable he's still on TV even though he easily brings in the highest ratings now. This is a very good interview, and any critics of Tucker really should reevaluate what they support if they think he's not simply the only TV journalist with a backbone and high integrity. Could he do Bldg 7? He did get in a segment about all the sudden deaths happening after 'vaccine' rollout, and now he had Ed Dowd on his long format show. Frankly, the crimes of the scamdemic, which admittedly were able to take place because of the 9/11 propaganda and cover-up, are far more relevant and far bigger and more important right now. If he can do those stories more then maybe the taboo of 9/11 truth breaks down even more.
I agree with you. As more time passes since 9/11, the more, I doubt the official narrative that we’ve been spoon-fed. What bolsters my doubts about the 9/11 narrative are the fact that we’ve also been, in my opinion, lied to, and misled about the murders of JFK, RFK, MLK, and Malcolm X. Especially after three years of lies, misinformation, dis- information about the Wuhan virus, it’s origins, and especially about the experimental, mRNA injections. I can simply not believe anything that comes out of “official“ government, outlets, and organs. That’s a sad commentary.
9-11 was a necessary steping stone to set the foundation for the current scamdemic. The lattr is he logical extension of the former. God Bless Richard and Gail for all their hard ork over the past 2 decades. I tip my hat.
Trump wouldn’t live long if he were to blow the whistle. A tragic accident would befall him . Look what happpend to the Kennedys when JFK said ,” I would break up the CIA and cast it to the winds “ . Israel would not have gotten nukes or expanded under the Kennedys. Bobby was assasinations right after he won his first primary. The message , don’t cross the govt.
I am a fan of Mr Carlson and his enlightening program. My concern is with the (low intelligence seeming) outbursts of laughs from him that emanate over incredulous statements. I am inclined to believe that Tucker has a neurological error that prompts these childish outbursts. I will continue to watch his segments while I try to ignore the inappropriate shows of mental aberrations.
Probably a learned response to conflict as opposed to neurologic damage. He openly confessed to being a former "drinker" and experienced a troublesome childhood. I found the interview largely in Tucker's favor as he answered questions with humility and humbleness.
heir to many "fortun-ate son" but truth
I have always wondered, Richard, why, when you had this incredible opportunity, the woman asked you, she showed in her voice and manner that she was incredulous about it and you went off on a large explanation, droning on [with truth of course] when you ought to have focused her attention and had here further explain why she was so shocked by this TRUTH. Maybe it all could have ended way back then.
I understand your position, you wanted to get as much info as possible in the short time the media always gives, but the focus SHOULD ALWAYS BE on the TOTAL IMPOSSIBILITIES OF THE USGs' Official 9/11 Conspiracy Theory. Joe and Joess Q Public can't process all the data and all the science but we must HAVE THEM FOCUS ON THE TOTAL IMPOSSIBILITIES of the US Governments' Fairy Tale.
He did a flawless job making the case for controlled demolition. Both newscasters understood everything he was telling them and reflected and reinforced the key ideas for the audience. Both Richard and the interviewers did an excellent job. I wonder what's happened to those two reporters in the intervening years. For you to suggest that the 911 deception and controversy could have ended all those years ago if Richard had just focussed on her shock is not only false but ludicrous.
I didn't say Richard did a bad/lousy/... job, I offered some constructive criticism which I hope will be helpful in the future. When one gets a reaction like that lady/media person offered, which was shock, let that person have the floor, because what "conspiracy theorists" [again, no slight intended, what the usa governments have done to marginalize scientists and academics] have to say doesn't carry as much weight as a newscaster who could have said things like, "if that is the case and there is evidence for it, then this is a whole new ballgame!!" And other such like things.
We all make mistakes, I know my own in my own field and I can accept that I could have done a better job. I doubt Richard is so fragile that he can't listen to constructive criticism.
I, of course, meant in the Fox News interview with the man and the woman. Why didn't you ask them to follow up on WTC7 freefall. How in the world can "news" people hear about such a complete impossibility and not take it any further? Why haven't you taken it further? Why not ask them, the Fox news duo, why they failed to wonder why FEMA, who ACTUALLY did the study of the molten/vaporized WTCs 1, 2 & 7 steel, are not asking NIST why NIST is calling them liars by NIST denying the existence of MOLTEN STEEL!!???
Why Fox News didn't/doesn't ask the NYTs why they dropped the ball after they had published at length about the FEMA study of the molten/vaporized WTCs 1, 2 & 7 steel and the denial of NIST that that molten/vaporized WTCs 1, 2 & 7 steel even exists?!!!??
Your name should be 9/11 Troll; get lost.
well- time for everything to wide open right before the sink the entire ship
what's left of the people- and there won't be many after the fatal injection, will be arguing forever
unless they are in their 15 minute cities forbidden to think- wake up now folks
I am a nonconsensual subject in Darpa brain initiative. I have been implanted and tortured for a decade. I have Elon Musk's Neuralink and am being tortured with it. Thousands of Americans are being chipped and harmed and forcedd to death for brain wave data and AI. Obama started and to hide he passed law covering his crimes and labeling his victims crazy. https://t.co/4b6L4nKw3e
Watch your back Tucker.
I think I get it now, Sink.
What does that mean, Sink?
And this one on WTC 7 seismic evidence:
https://youtu.be/4S7njkLps0A
That should help your confusion:
https://youtu.be/S0J9CfOLS9k
You are assuming the correctness of the official narration instead of the destruction by controlled demolition.
What's the relevance?
You've only made half a point. Without comparison to other collapses or the expectations of fundamental physics, a low (or high) seismic reading tells us nothing. There are also potential confounding factors -- basement levels vs. concrete slab, etc. Corroboration of the reading/measurement is also needed. At this point, I don't see anything alarming about this particular seismic event.
Building 7 collapsed due to structural failure. I know, it's boring. It's far more exciting to think it was some super secret controlled demolition with mysterious strangers and shady people 'predicting' that the building was going to collapse.
Good Wednesday Morning SheThinksLiberty!
Late last night I read your post regarding Dr. Bhakdi. I hadn't checked on the present condition of Princess Bajrakitiyabha in the past week or so. Being that there's scant information about her present condition I'm assuming she's still on full life-support. As for Dr. Bhakdi, certainly a heartfelt few moments for him. I pray he's got good security attending him.
As for Tucker Carlson, I guess we'll all see what transpires, won't we?
Reading your post regarding Tucker, I recall an interview Patrick Bet David had with Richard Gage back in October last year. I was late in listening/watching that interview, seeing it in late November. I was rather astonished Patrick Bet David could not come to grips with even the slightest remote possibility that our own "govern - ment" was fully in on the act and IS fully in on the cover-up. Patrick's reasoning? Something of that magnitude, somebody in the gang is ALWAYS gonna spill the beans. Patrick was unequivocal in his opinion. My own immediate thought was : Patrick wake up! Ghislaine Maxwell has already begun serving her sentence related to her case and there's, mysteriously, no client list revealed? Nobody has confessed any-thing regarding that case.
I was tempted to E-mail Patrick, yet I don't regularly regularly listen/watch his content, so I didn't. Perhaps I should have?
Interestingly on one of Ron Paul's episodes last week, Dr. Paul (again) declared he could not bring himself to believe the entire COVID psy-op was/is entirely manufactured to serve manifold ends. Dr. Paul's reasoning? He unabashedly stated : "I just can't believe there are people in the world that are that evil."
In the earliest days of the global scam-demic psy-op I quickly lost count of how many times I heard the exact same, or some variation of, statement as Dr. Paul's.
My immediate unequivocal response to such "reasoning" was and remains : Let us refamiliarize ourselves with Sacred Holy Scripture known as the Holy Bible. To preclude and be clear, I am far, FAR, from being any saint. Let's just say I'm a jagged piece of clay in formation. Even so I encourage anybody (including Patrick Bet David and Dr. Paul) to read some particular passages/teachings in the New Testament. What was one of the three temptations the devil proposed to the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ? MATT. 4: 8 - 10 : Again the devil took him up into a very high mountain, and shewed him all the kingdoms of the world , and the glory of them,
9. And said to him : All these will I give them, if falling down thou wilt adore me.
10. Then Jesus saith to him : Begone, Satan : for it is written, The Lord thy God shalt thou adore, and him only shalt thou serve. (DOUAY-RHEIMS).
Among several messages/teachings in those few verses it begets an all important and poignant question, does it not? How many have taken the devil's/Satan's command in order to gain/obtain what he offered to Jesus? Isn't the same temptation just as real today as when Jesus walked the earth amongst us? IMO, indeed it is. As it has been through all time. I'll leave everybody else to their own contemplation.
To All, PEACE and be well.
Whatever truth you have in your post, 9/11 R, and I am not judging it one way or the other, you lose credibility by repeat posting the same thing. Have you any actual evidence? Have you something that describes what the seismic reading ought to be? Does the renowned French Professor, name escapes me now, Rousseau?? says anything about your point? Come to think about it, he does.
https://www.consensus911.org/point-tt-7/
You're trolling; one post on the topic (especially an unclear one) is quite sufficient.