Looks like the Pentagon benefitted with our tax dollars for 20+ more years of war with unlimited funding for the military-industrial complex and all their "consultants." No more justice here as our democracy dwindles-away. :( :( :(
Karl Schwarz, prior AR State Senator and guest speaker at Confronting the Evidence, NYC, 2004, happens to have been a forerunner in the manufacturing of carbon nanotubes. This explains why he was reluctant to meet with me after acknowledging that galvanic corrosion could very likely become a huge problem for the Towers in the City's salt air.
What needs to be recognised is that two massive propaganda campaigns were implemented for 9/11:
--- the mainstream campaign
--- the campaign targeted to the anticipated disbelievers of the cockamamie story
The truther-targeted propaganda campaign contains a number of sub-themes, including but not limited to:
--- Israel did it! (plus Saudi Arabia plus Pakistan plus ... )
--- WTC-7 collapse (not part of the terror story and no need for it on 9/11 - could have come down later as did WTCs 3-6 - its purpose in part at least was to distract from the more revealing faked planes)
--- A number of different theories for what methods were used to demolish the buildings
--- All manner of theories for what hit the buildings
--- Grieving and angry loved ones
The main purpose of the truther-targeted propaganda campaign is to maintain truthers' belief in real death and injury. The truth of 9/11 is though that it was, in essence, a massive demolition job - the whole of the WTC was eventually destroyed - in the guise of a terrorist attack but in reality a massive Full-Scale Anti-Terrorist Exercise comprising numerous smaller exercises and drills, many about which they informed us ... with a crucial few they didn't, such as the drills producing the images of the injured. The jumpers were faked, the miracle survivor stories are ridiculous, the purported injured are "drill" injured, the dust is mostly "drill" dust. Perhaps some people really were killed or injured but every single skerrick of visual evidence presented shows no signs of reality.
I think we can infer that the buildings came down using conventional explosives and all the alleged evidence put forward for molten steel, thermitic materials, red-grey chips, etc is propaganda. Who else would have brought the buildings down but the Loizeaux company and why would they use an unfamiliar method? Why wouldn't they use a tried and true method they were expert in using?
Looks like the Pentagon benefitted with our tax dollars for 20+ more years of war with unlimited funding for the military-industrial complex and all their "consultants." No more justice here as our democracy dwindles-away. :( :( :(
Karl Schwarz, prior AR State Senator and guest speaker at Confronting the Evidence, NYC, 2004, happens to have been a forerunner in the manufacturing of carbon nanotubes. This explains why he was reluctant to meet with me after acknowledging that galvanic corrosion could very likely become a huge problem for the Towers in the City's salt air.
I have Kevin Ryan's book Another 19.
Thank you. I'm also reminded to order a copy of Another 19.
Peace, Rebecca
What needs to be recognised is that two massive propaganda campaigns were implemented for 9/11:
--- the mainstream campaign
--- the campaign targeted to the anticipated disbelievers of the cockamamie story
The truther-targeted propaganda campaign contains a number of sub-themes, including but not limited to:
--- Israel did it! (plus Saudi Arabia plus Pakistan plus ... )
--- WTC-7 collapse (not part of the terror story and no need for it on 9/11 - could have come down later as did WTCs 3-6 - its purpose in part at least was to distract from the more revealing faked planes)
--- A number of different theories for what methods were used to demolish the buildings
--- All manner of theories for what hit the buildings
--- Grieving and angry loved ones
The main purpose of the truther-targeted propaganda campaign is to maintain truthers' belief in real death and injury. The truth of 9/11 is though that it was, in essence, a massive demolition job - the whole of the WTC was eventually destroyed - in the guise of a terrorist attack but in reality a massive Full-Scale Anti-Terrorist Exercise comprising numerous smaller exercises and drills, many about which they informed us ... with a crucial few they didn't, such as the drills producing the images of the injured. The jumpers were faked, the miracle survivor stories are ridiculous, the purported injured are "drill" injured, the dust is mostly "drill" dust. Perhaps some people really were killed or injured but every single skerrick of visual evidence presented shows no signs of reality.
I think we can infer that the buildings came down using conventional explosives and all the alleged evidence put forward for molten steel, thermitic materials, red-grey chips, etc is propaganda. Who else would have brought the buildings down but the Loizeaux company and why would they use an unfamiliar method? Why wouldn't they use a tried and true method they were expert in using?
Wow.
This was well worth rereading and rewatching.
Thank you.