What an incredible well researched and written article, Richard. I figured 10/7 was a false flag, but this gives me a lot more context and evidence. I will look forward to your next post. Thank you so much.
Thank you for this thorough and detailed analysis. I look forward to Part 2.
When talking about trade routes and natural resources, such as oil and gas, it is often tacitly assumed that the goals of protagonists are to cut costs and maximize throughput or sales. However, just as important as volume is the price for which passage through a trade-route or a natural resource can command: scarcity drives higher prices, but reduced volume hinders profitability; conversely higher volume tends to lead to lower prices, again hindering profitability; profit maximisation thus requires a careful trade-off between volume and price, which is only possible in highly controlled markets. The aims of wars over oil / gas reserves and trade routes are thus not necessarily simply about exploiting both to the maximum extent, but also about preventing other people from doing so, which would lead to market competition, destroying the potential for exorbitant profits. The 'Net Zero' agenda also serves this goal by discouraging exploitation of coal, oil and gas reserves as does opposition to renewable and nuclear energy schemes. It's the old Mercantilist scam that international trading companies convinced national governments to support in the Eighteenth Century before it was exposed for what it was in Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations.
In the specific case of oil, the situation is further complicated by its ties to the US dollar as the world reserve currency, rendering of interest to banking interests as well as mercantile ones. Since the 1970s major oil producing countries have committing to only selling oil in US dollars, hence the value of the dollar (now a fiat currency not tied to any precious metal or other tangible asset) can be regulated by controlling the production of oil. Heads of state and government who break rank frequently find themselves dying in mysterious circumstances or facing mass protests, revolutions or invasions.
Whether US Federal government and the Chinese Communist Party are really rivals ideoligically or in this quest for dominance of natural resources and trade routes, as they are so keen to present themselves, is questionable. US-China trade has long being an important, but frequently overlooked, factor in world events. The American Revolution started when the 1773 Tea Act granted the right to trade directly between China and North America to the East India Company, whose flag lives on in the Stars and Stripes freed of its British associations (and accompanying Parliamentary oversight). Subsequent western expansion from the original 13 colonies, with the help of Chinese labor, opened up the much shorter Sino-American trade route across the Pacific. John Pomfret's The Beautiful Country and the Middle Kingdom demonstrates that Sino-American interactions have been a potent force in both countries from the Revolution onwards. Standard Oil interest interests in China are also cited in Smedly Butler's War is A Racket. In more recent times, let us not forget that the steel of the towers demolished on 9/11 were sent to Communist China for disposal, US defence companies are heavily active in China and US technology companies sell surveillance and censorship tools to China, US Federal Government collaborates with the Chinese Communist Party to develop bioweapons and the Chinese Communist Party is a major funder of the US government through bond purchases and that president Trump's attempts to challenge current Sino-American trading relationship, to the benefit of smaller US suppliers, seemingly ensured his perpetual vilification. Ultimately the Mercantilist scams only work so long as the criminals act in unison: "We're in this together," as they are so fond of telling us.
I thought this the minute it happened. Thank you for this.
What an incredible well researched and written article, Richard. I figured 10/7 was a false flag, but this gives me a lot more context and evidence. I will look forward to your next post. Thank you so much.
Thank you for posting this. Many of the independent researchers have found there's a definite parallel to 911 false flag.
I often point out that Hamas doesn't have aircraft or airfields, so how did they drop the parachuters?
My answer is that it's Mossad.
Israel attacked itself, not realizing that most people are able to see it as PR BS, wag the dog.
This is a stunning essay Richard. Brings so much together. A fantastic resource all in one place.
Wow, what a comprehensive piece. If only there were more people reading it…
Fantastic, comprehensive piece.
Thank you for this thorough and detailed analysis. I look forward to Part 2.
When talking about trade routes and natural resources, such as oil and gas, it is often tacitly assumed that the goals of protagonists are to cut costs and maximize throughput or sales. However, just as important as volume is the price for which passage through a trade-route or a natural resource can command: scarcity drives higher prices, but reduced volume hinders profitability; conversely higher volume tends to lead to lower prices, again hindering profitability; profit maximisation thus requires a careful trade-off between volume and price, which is only possible in highly controlled markets. The aims of wars over oil / gas reserves and trade routes are thus not necessarily simply about exploiting both to the maximum extent, but also about preventing other people from doing so, which would lead to market competition, destroying the potential for exorbitant profits. The 'Net Zero' agenda also serves this goal by discouraging exploitation of coal, oil and gas reserves as does opposition to renewable and nuclear energy schemes. It's the old Mercantilist scam that international trading companies convinced national governments to support in the Eighteenth Century before it was exposed for what it was in Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations.
In the specific case of oil, the situation is further complicated by its ties to the US dollar as the world reserve currency, rendering of interest to banking interests as well as mercantile ones. Since the 1970s major oil producing countries have committing to only selling oil in US dollars, hence the value of the dollar (now a fiat currency not tied to any precious metal or other tangible asset) can be regulated by controlling the production of oil. Heads of state and government who break rank frequently find themselves dying in mysterious circumstances or facing mass protests, revolutions or invasions.
Whether US Federal government and the Chinese Communist Party are really rivals ideoligically or in this quest for dominance of natural resources and trade routes, as they are so keen to present themselves, is questionable. US-China trade has long being an important, but frequently overlooked, factor in world events. The American Revolution started when the 1773 Tea Act granted the right to trade directly between China and North America to the East India Company, whose flag lives on in the Stars and Stripes freed of its British associations (and accompanying Parliamentary oversight). Subsequent western expansion from the original 13 colonies, with the help of Chinese labor, opened up the much shorter Sino-American trade route across the Pacific. John Pomfret's The Beautiful Country and the Middle Kingdom demonstrates that Sino-American interactions have been a potent force in both countries from the Revolution onwards. Standard Oil interest interests in China are also cited in Smedly Butler's War is A Racket. In more recent times, let us not forget that the steel of the towers demolished on 9/11 were sent to Communist China for disposal, US defence companies are heavily active in China and US technology companies sell surveillance and censorship tools to China, US Federal Government collaborates with the Chinese Communist Party to develop bioweapons and the Chinese Communist Party is a major funder of the US government through bond purchases and that president Trump's attempts to challenge current Sino-American trading relationship, to the benefit of smaller US suppliers, seemingly ensured his perpetual vilification. Ultimately the Mercantilist scams only work so long as the criminals act in unison: "We're in this together," as they are so fond of telling us.