World Trade Center building Seven (WTC7) had fire proofing covering all the steel beams in it and it was not hit by an airplane.
Dr. Leroy Halsey said no main stream media has interviewed him.
April 6, 2024: Professor, Zdeněk P. Bažant submitted an analysis to the ASCE's Journal of Engineering Mechanics that contained glaring errors and inaccurate assumptions to explain why the Twin Towers collapsed following the airplane impacts. Roland Angle, working with mechanical engineer Tony Szamboti think they have found mathematical errors in his analysis that ignore certain fundamental laws of physics and which destroy the foundation on which National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) based its theory of for why the progressive collapse occurred.
Therefore the NIST reports were highly unscientific and merely papered over the easily observable evidence that explosives caused the Twin Towers' destruction.
The NIST report on the destruction of the towers, published in 2005 only gave a hypothetical explanation for the initiation of the failures of the Twin Towers. It did not describe the mechanics of the total collapses of the Twin Towers and specifically endorsed Bažant’s theory to explain how the 110 story towers experienced complete collapse.
Bažant grossly overestimated input values that would be destructive and grossly underestimated input values that would be resistive.
The 2001 Anthrax Letter Attacks that enhanced the lie that Iraq had WMDs.
And when the US Attorney, The Court of Appeals, and the US Supreme Court refuses to empanel a grand jury to judge the direct evidence that proves explosions and/or incendiaries caused the total collapses of the World Trade Center buildings, our representative democracy is disabled.
The odds? Lt. Colonel David Gapp tell us about 9/11 Aviation Improbabilities
What are the odds the alleged hijackers would know where over the US to turn off the airplanes transponder and where to make a u-turn to better not be seen on the ATC/Norad radar screens?
What are the odds of them flying a 330 degree coordinate-flight turn from 7,000 feet and hitting the Pentagon, when skilled pilots could only do this one in three attempts in a simulator? ZERO
None of the passengers could have made a cell phone to report the alleged hijackers with box cutters, because the airplanes were too high and flying at some 500 mph. IMPOSSIBLE.
What are the odds that eight airline’s pilots would allow the alleged hijackers to take over their airplane? And the odds of taking over the four airplanes without pilots turning the airplane upside down to knock the alleged hijacker off their feet?
What are the odds of the very unskilled hijacker pilots hitting the Twin Towers at some 500 mph? ZERO.
The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), as the leading engineering organization in the United States, also abetted the crime by endorsing NIST's fraudulent 9/11 reports and attempting to shut down any challenge to the official story within their membership.
This link explains the science that proves NIST and ASCE are guilty of lying to Americans. NIST therefore lied to the US Congress who had task NIST which is under the Department of Commerce to explain how and why the three World Trade Center buildings collapsed on 9/11. NIST DID NOT explain why or how the Twin Towers totally collapsed. That alone is violation of the tasking Congress ordered to be done of a mass murder incident. Never before nor after 9/11 has any steel high rise building ever collapse due to fire, as was the case of World Trade Center building seven and the wreckage piles of all three buildings remain unexplained too hot and producing white smoke for over a month. The New York Fired department poured massive amounts of water onto this wreckage, yet the heat and white smoke continued for over a month and therein pointing to a fire burning in the wreckage. Given this smoke was only white also is evidence that the white smoke was aluminum oxide produced by the burning of nano-thermite which burns even under water.
Bill Binney a former software expert who worked for NSA has said Clinton emails were not stolen by hacking. The DNC’s computer was not hacked because that was physically IMPOSSIBLE. And emails made public on Wikileaks were copied from the DNC computer using a thumb driver or CD-rom.
Clinton was really, really unpopular herself — almost as unpopular as Trump — with a favorability rating of just 43 percent among Election Day voters.
Clinton was viewed as dishonest and untrustworthy, a theme Sanders and his supporters used in his primary against her. Would Clinton still have been “Crooked Hillary” even without the Russians? Almost certainly.
The FBI and the office of the Director of National Intelligence said there's no evidence the Russians affected the outcome. The office of the Director of National Intelligence
The DNC needs to say this because their silence is the same as lying and therefore reflects negatively on the horror of US citizens who self indentify as Democrats.
Therefore we demand the DNC remove Hillary Clinton and Rep. Adam Schiff as members of the Democratic Party for violating our code of conduct. Additionally, we demand the DNC removed Bill Clinton as a member of the Democratic Party due to his doing sexual assault to including raping of at least three women and his relationship with Jeffry Epstein. If you agree, reply to me at dickmcmanus55@aol.com and I will publicly list your good name in a public petition.
------------------
We need to hold Rep Schiff accountable! For two and a half years, US Rep. Adam Schiff hid from the American public testimony given by Shawn Henry of Crowdstrike until he was forced to make it public on May 7, 2021.
CrowdStrike, Shawn Henry oversaw half of the FBI’s investigative operations as Executive Assistant Director, including all FBI criminal and cyber investigations worldwide, international operations, and the FBI’s critical incident response to major investigations and disasters. He also managed computer crime investigations spanning the globe, established the National Cyber Investigative Joint Task Force, and received the Presidential Rank Award for Meritorious Executive for his leadership in enhancing the FBI’s cyber capabilities.
On Dec. 12, 2016, Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) formally ruled out, on technical grounds, the possibility that the Russians “hacked” those DNC emails. Members of VIPS were senior NSA experts who said the DNC emails downloaded (not hacked) using a thumb drive or CD-rom and therefore“… the emails were leaked by an insider.
Blindingly obvious, and blindlingly ignored by media who gives us other things to argue about and to make us argumentative to make it almost impossible to get the message out in a timely manner and yet, it inevitably will. Too late to get satisfaction of exposing the filth.
Unintended consequences for the empire. They didn't anticipate that the people MOST qualified to dismember their narrative--professional engineers, architects, physicists, and chemists would do just that, and in an organized powerful manner. Take heart, What else is waiting for them by way of unintended consequences!
I always say that what convinced me about 9/11 was the cumulative evidence related to the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, Shanksville, and many other aspects of what happened that day. In the links below on my new channel Truth and Shadows I do an overview of the evidence that the Pentagon wasn't hit by a 757. In the second link, I get into Citizen Investigation Team and the north-path witnesses. I think the WTC evidence is essential, but so is the Pentagon because if a plane crash was faked at the Pentagon there is only one entity that could have been responsible - the U.S. goverrnment.
Nuclear events provided significant parts of the inertial forces. Heinz Pommer, Jeff Prager, and a few others have written about that. The evidence is ample, like the large structural pieces driven horizontally to impale into the American Express Building.
Yes, and another fascinating but largely unknown fact was the story of Kurt Sonnenfeld, the FEMA photographer that day, who has since been forced to take up residence in South America like Ed Snowden now living in Russia. Sonnenfeld published extremely embarrassing photos fatal to the official narrative. Those photos were taken down about a week or 2 later, and Prager shows some of them in his book Amerika Nuked.
There certainly were nuclear events there that day, but that does not mean that no other methods were used to destroy the place.
yes, I have a good explanation. the detonations went off
A good video/lecture as to why we need a new FBI investigation or new Congressional investigation of 9/11
part one WTC7
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXAuYjcjjPo
Part 2: NIST’s false statements about the Twin Towers' collapse
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6F16xBQPMU
Part 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YLaPD7AVJE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWi0x9xigQM
World Trade Center building Seven (WTC7) had fire proofing covering all the steel beams in it and it was not hit by an airplane.
Dr. Leroy Halsey said no main stream media has interviewed him.
April 6, 2024: Professor, Zdeněk P. Bažant submitted an analysis to the ASCE's Journal of Engineering Mechanics that contained glaring errors and inaccurate assumptions to explain why the Twin Towers collapsed following the airplane impacts. Roland Angle, working with mechanical engineer Tony Szamboti think they have found mathematical errors in his analysis that ignore certain fundamental laws of physics and which destroy the foundation on which National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) based its theory of for why the progressive collapse occurred.
Therefore the NIST reports were highly unscientific and merely papered over the easily observable evidence that explosives caused the Twin Towers' destruction.
The NIST report on the destruction of the towers, published in 2005 only gave a hypothetical explanation for the initiation of the failures of the Twin Towers. It did not describe the mechanics of the total collapses of the Twin Towers and specifically endorsed Bažant’s theory to explain how the 110 story towers experienced complete collapse.
Bažant grossly overestimated input values that would be destructive and grossly underestimated input values that would be resistive.
The 2001 Anthrax Letter Attacks that enhanced the lie that Iraq had WMDs.
Source: see this URL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6MKBJSLqJc&t=281s
Kevin Ryan is the foremost authority on what happened that day as Editor of the Journal of 9/11 Studies A YouTube video of him being interviewed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xrnx5yhihj8
And when the US Attorney, The Court of Appeals, and the US Supreme Court refuses to empanel a grand jury to judge the direct evidence that proves explosions and/or incendiaries caused the total collapses of the World Trade Center buildings, our representative democracy is disabled.
The odds? Lt. Colonel David Gapp tell us about 9/11 Aviation Improbabilities
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1491828354927727&aggr_v_ids[0]=1491828354927727¬if_id=1700307835597620¬if_t=watch_follower_video&ref=notif
What are the odds the alleged hijackers would know where over the US to turn off the airplanes transponder and where to make a u-turn to better not be seen on the ATC/Norad radar screens?
What are the odds of them flying a 330 degree coordinate-flight turn from 7,000 feet and hitting the Pentagon, when skilled pilots could only do this one in three attempts in a simulator? ZERO
None of the passengers could have made a cell phone to report the alleged hijackers with box cutters, because the airplanes were too high and flying at some 500 mph. IMPOSSIBLE.
What are the odds that eight airline’s pilots would allow the alleged hijackers to take over their airplane? And the odds of taking over the four airplanes without pilots turning the airplane upside down to knock the alleged hijacker off their feet?
What are the odds of the very unskilled hijacker pilots hitting the Twin Towers at some 500 mph? ZERO.
The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), as the leading engineering organization in the United States, also abetted the crime by endorsing NIST's fraudulent 9/11 reports and attempting to shut down any challenge to the official story within their membership.
This link explains the science that proves NIST and ASCE are guilty of lying to Americans. NIST therefore lied to the US Congress who had task NIST which is under the Department of Commerce to explain how and why the three World Trade Center buildings collapsed on 9/11. NIST DID NOT explain why or how the Twin Towers totally collapsed. That alone is violation of the tasking Congress ordered to be done of a mass murder incident. Never before nor after 9/11 has any steel high rise building ever collapse due to fire, as was the case of World Trade Center building seven and the wreckage piles of all three buildings remain unexplained too hot and producing white smoke for over a month. The New York Fired department poured massive amounts of water onto this wreckage, yet the heat and white smoke continued for over a month and therein pointing to a fire burning in the wreckage. Given this smoke was only white also is evidence that the white smoke was aluminum oxide produced by the burning of nano-thermite which burns even under water.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_U6v7MqDzE&t=15s
for my book “9/11 Direct Evidence”
Send me an email at dickmcmanus55@aol.com
and I will reply with the book for FREE
From: Richard McManus
Chief Warrant Officer-3/counterintelligence special agent, US Army, retired, BS psychology and nursing, Everett, WA
Regarding "we need a new FBI investigation. " FIRST we need an independent investigation of the FBI!
Bill Binney a former software expert who worked for NSA has said Clinton emails were not stolen by hacking. The DNC’s computer was not hacked because that was physically IMPOSSIBLE. And emails made public on Wikileaks were copied from the DNC computer using a thumb driver or CD-rom.
Clinton was really, really unpopular herself — almost as unpopular as Trump — with a favorability rating of just 43 percent among Election Day voters.
Clinton was viewed as dishonest and untrustworthy, a theme Sanders and his supporters used in his primary against her. Would Clinton still have been “Crooked Hillary” even without the Russians? Almost certainly.
The FBI and the office of the Director of National Intelligence said there's no evidence the Russians affected the outcome. The office of the Director of National Intelligence
The DNC needs to say this because their silence is the same as lying and therefore reflects negatively on the horror of US citizens who self indentify as Democrats.
Therefore we demand the DNC remove Hillary Clinton and Rep. Adam Schiff as members of the Democratic Party for violating our code of conduct. Additionally, we demand the DNC removed Bill Clinton as a member of the Democratic Party due to his doing sexual assault to including raping of at least three women and his relationship with Jeffry Epstein. If you agree, reply to me at dickmcmanus55@aol.com and I will publicly list your good name in a public petition.
------------------
We need to hold Rep Schiff accountable! For two and a half years, US Rep. Adam Schiff hid from the American public testimony given by Shawn Henry of Crowdstrike until he was forced to make it public on May 7, 2021.
CrowdStrike, Shawn Henry oversaw half of the FBI’s investigative operations as Executive Assistant Director, including all FBI criminal and cyber investigations worldwide, international operations, and the FBI’s critical incident response to major investigations and disasters. He also managed computer crime investigations spanning the globe, established the National Cyber Investigative Joint Task Force, and received the Presidential Rank Award for Meritorious Executive for his leadership in enhancing the FBI’s cyber capabilities.
Source: Fast forward to 24:39/1:01:45 at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h68HSKTWXmw
On Dec. 12, 2016, Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) formally ruled out, on technical grounds, the possibility that the Russians “hacked” those DNC emails. Members of VIPS were senior NSA experts who said the DNC emails downloaded (not hacked) using a thumb drive or CD-rom and therefore“… the emails were leaked by an insider.
Seth
Blindingly obvious, and blindlingly ignored by media who gives us other things to argue about and to make us argumentative to make it almost impossible to get the message out in a timely manner and yet, it inevitably will. Too late to get satisfaction of exposing the filth.
I see flash and sequences of explosions ripping the building apart with full force. What do other people see?
Unintended consequences for the empire. They didn't anticipate that the people MOST qualified to dismember their narrative--professional engineers, architects, physicists, and chemists would do just that, and in an organized powerful manner. Take heart, What else is waiting for them by way of unintended consequences!
NIST=Nest of TRAITORS! Enemies of the American People!
the Perpe-traitors
The truth finds a way..it was an inside job... 9-11 >> another Pearl Harbor which was FDR's inside job. The Japanese code was broken in 1940.
I always say that what convinced me about 9/11 was the cumulative evidence related to the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, Shanksville, and many other aspects of what happened that day. In the links below on my new channel Truth and Shadows I do an overview of the evidence that the Pentagon wasn't hit by a 757. In the second link, I get into Citizen Investigation Team and the north-path witnesses. I think the WTC evidence is essential, but so is the Pentagon because if a plane crash was faked at the Pentagon there is only one entity that could have been responsible - the U.S. goverrnment.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gXzUAdOj5k&t=3256s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0rlp-SOjqI&t=163s
Can you please share it on your F.B page so it's easier to share. 😁
Nuclear events provided significant parts of the inertial forces. Heinz Pommer, Jeff Prager, and a few others have written about that. The evidence is ample, like the large structural pieces driven horizontally to impale into the American Express Building.
Yes, and another fascinating but largely unknown fact was the story of Kurt Sonnenfeld, the FEMA photographer that day, who has since been forced to take up residence in South America like Ed Snowden now living in Russia. Sonnenfeld published extremely embarrassing photos fatal to the official narrative. Those photos were taken down about a week or 2 later, and Prager shows some of them in his book Amerika Nuked.
There certainly were nuclear events there that day, but that does not mean that no other methods were used to destroy the place.