There's a New Kid on the Block. And He's Carrying a Big Stick!
There's a New Kid on the Block. And He's Carrying a Big Stick!
International Center for 9/11 Justice Launches with Breakthrough Peer-Reviewed WTC 7 Paper
The International Center for 9/11 Justice was created by a set of very influential 9/11 researchers and activists. And it’s not just another average organization. This major effort, headed by a consortium of well-respected influential figures in the 9/11 Truth Movement, is effectively resurrecting the best of three prominent technically-oriented organizations in the Movement that have received far less attention than they have deserved over the last decade or so. The International Center for 9/11 Justice is the new kid on the block and it is already raising eyebrows.
The organization published a new peer-reviewed paper, The Instantaneous Free Fall of World Trade Center Building 7 and NIST’s Attempt to Hide It, co-authored by David Chandler, Ted Walter, and Tony Szamboti.
In the IC911 article by Kevin Ryan, he notes:
“Now, in the most comprehensive measurements of Building 7’s downward motion to date, Chandler, Walter, and Szamboti show that — contrary to NIST’s claim of a gradual transition to free fall — the transition to free fall was instantaneous and simultaneous across the entire measurable width of the building’s roofline. They then show how this observed behavior is incompatible with NIST’s explanation of the building’s destruction.”
The three major organizations brought to the fore within this ambitious new kid on the block are the:
1. 2011 Toronto Hearings: these International Hearings focused on the events of September 11, 2001 and were held on the 10th anniversary of 9/11 at Ryerson University.
“The Hearings brought together many of the world’s leading 9/11 researchers for four days of presentations on the best evidence that contradicts the official account of 9/11. That evidence was heard by an international panel of distinguished individuals in academia and law. The panel then reconvened after the Hearings to decide which aspects of the evidence deserved further investigation.”
I was honored to speak at this groundbreaking event and submitted a short paper published in the resulting 9/11 Toronto Report.
2. Journal of 9/11 Studies: a very important high-quality collection of chiefly technical peer-reviewed articles headed up by Kevin Ryan and other great 9/11 researchers.
The Journal of 9/11 Studies is the flagship publication of the International Center for 9/11 Justice. It is a peer-reviewed, electronic-only journal covering research related to the events of September 11, 2001. Many fields of study are represented and all content is freely available online.
Since 2006, the Journal has presented some of the most compelling analysis and evidence related to the crimes of 9/11. Today, its mission is to offer new evidence-based findings and perspectives that have not yet been addressed. The Journal’s content can also be found on the Journal’s original website, Journalof911Studies.com.
3. 9/11 Consensus Panel: a monumental effort to get a couple dozen of the most well-read 9/11 researchers and activists in the 9/11 Truth Movement to assemble a body of evidence that they could agree on - including the destruction of the WTC. I heard that this incredibly important achievement was like hearding cats. Huge thanks to Elizabeth Woodworth and the late great David Ray Griffin.
“The 9/11 Consensus Panel was a panel of 23 experts convened from 2011 to 2017 for the purpose of providing a clear statement of the best evidence contradicting the official account of 9/11. Its purpose was also to provide a ready source of evidence-based research to any investigation that may be undertaken by the public, the media, academia, or any other investigative body or institution.
Using a simplified version of the Delphi Method, the Panel published a total of 51 Consensus Points — each point achieving at least 85% agreement by over 20 panelists. In 2018, 9/11 Consensus Panel founders David Ray Griffin and Elizabeth Woodworth authored the book 9/11 Unmasked, which provides the 51 Consensus Points in a comprehensive volume.”
It is an ambitious and very worthy effort deserving all our support. Please send out the IC911.org link widely - and let’s raise awareness about what really happened on 9/11 - or we will lose our country to the dark forces that brought this engineered disaster to us and made most of us swallow it - hook, line, and sinker. It’s time to act, and quite aptly the new org has an “Action of the Week” for us to follow up on. So now there is something actually tangible that you can do for humanity every week.
Thank you so much for your post, Richard!
9/11 has been the mother propaganda event of this century, and we believe that the public is now ready to see it exposed -- and all the transnational propaganda that has followed to deceive and control us -- so that our democracies can be reclaimed, backed up by an honest media.
Well said, Craig.
I saw this article on my FB timeline and was disappointed to see you, Richard, promoting this when I know you know what Ted did and what this is really all about.
Speaking of the “leaders” of the truth movement (or rather the people desperately trying to prop themselves up as that) they have turned this movement into something just as sleazy and opportunistic as Washington DC politics.
The only point Craig and I differ on is that I think Ted is the bigger problem in that bunch. Him and Bill Brinnier. And I’m not as focused on the Pentagon as much as I am the overall character of these people. I should be speaking out more but those two have proved themselves to be so vindictive that they’ll probably retaliate by taking their defamation campaign against Kelly (and apparently me now) to the internet and dragging her through the mud further, even while she’s barely involved anymore and is moving on in the world.
This is the only reason this new group exists-- they offered Kelly, and she accepted the position of Executive Director at AE911Truth. Ted had been trying to take control of AE911Truth for YEARS, even embarrassingly proclaiming that he wanted to become the new CEO while they were still deliberating firing Richard. “Make me the CEO! I’m ready for it!” Most of the staff appreciated the work Ted did but shuddered at the thought of him being in charge because of his control-freak nature, ego and micromanagement. Kelly was the real leader and power behind AE911Truth and had been for years, and everyone liked and respected her, so making her the ED was the logical choice.
Ted had yet another fight with the guy who does our graphics over a minor disagreement involving him boosting the contrast of a Free Fall promo pic (because Ted himself was on the show he was trying to micromanage every detail…again, ego.)
After Ted proclaimed he wouldn’t work with the guy anymore, and Kelly told Ted that he couldn’t refuse to work with him and that she wouldn’t fire the guy, it triggered Ted and his buddy Bill on the board to launch a defamation campaign against Kelly to other board members in order to make Ted the ED. Ted dug through nine years of texts between Kelly and him when they were friends, exaggerated and outright lied about her professional and personal life, and persuaded two new naïve board members who didn’t even really know her to go along with this. They even managed to declare a rule that anyone on the board who knew Kelly and might vote not to demand her resignation weren’t allowed to vote.
It was a kangaroo court, like when the CIA stages coups in foreign countries. Ted didn’t just want to be ED and take control of the whole organization…he demanded she be fired.
We were kept in the dark about what was happening, but we all pretty much knew. Right before the board vote I emailed them all, told all of them off (including Ted), and resigned in protest because it was just downright wrong. (That’s why I was a gone for a month and half…paperwork signed and everything.) And it wasn’t just me who was against what they were doing to Kelly…the entire staff was outraged.
Kelly could have fought it and kept her job, but she resigned without a fight and decided to let the baby have his bottle because after this experience, and after enduring harassment by lunatics for years (including death threats,) she decided she was done.
So, she was gone, but at her final board meeting, partly due to my unexpected and sudden departure and partly because of some things Kelly said in her own defense, one of the two new board members suddenly changed his mind and Ted didn’t get the votes he needed to become ED.
During that time, even though she was gone, Ted’s defamation campaign against her went on to every member of the truth movement he could find.
Apparently, they even had another vote sometime later to make him the ED, and Ted still didn’t get the votes he needed.
A month and a half later AE contacted me, saying they were about to fire Ted, and asking if I would come back. I said I would, at first on a limited basis only because of the state he had left the org in due to the civil war he triggered…but only after that creep was officially gone. (I was ready to move on to new creative endeavors, but it felt like a shame to let AE fall after putting so much work into it. Kelly encouraged me to come back when I talked to her about it.)
When Ted was out and he found out that I was back to replace him, his defamation campaign turned to me. I know this because I’ve been forwarded the emails.
So, this new group is basically a continuation of Ted’s personal ambition/revenge campaign after he went all Anakin Skywalker on us. He couldn’t get enough people at AE to hold their noses and give him the title he sold his soul for, so he found a way to give it to himself. I don’t really think it’s a threat to AE, but (9/11 family members excluded, who just don’t know any of this…as well as Tony Szamboti who is not involved in this) it is a haven for some very bad characters, and people I’ll never suffer the company of again. The bottom line is that you shouldn’t have liars trying to lead a “truth” movement, and people who carry out injustices claim to fight for justice.
It’s just so phony.
The same thing will happen to anyone who gets in the way of Ted’s personal ambition. He worked with Kelly side by side for nearly a decade and never had a problem with her until she was offered the title he wanted so desperately for years. Richard, he wanted to take your place years ago. Kelly’s the only reason it didn’t happen.
The reader may not care about what they did to Kelly because, unlike others, she’s not a shameless self-promoter. She never sought the limelight and therefore doesn’t have an army of groupies to spend years crying about it on her behalf, nor can she do anything to boost anyone’s personal prestige within the movement anymore….so there’s no personal benefit in rallying behind her and sucking up to her.
But I and others care, because it was wrong, and I’ve seen who these people really are for myself. (Bill Brinnier outright lied during Kelly’s last meeting about events that I personally witnessed.) It’s troubling, and people should at least have a chance to hear the truth about the kind of characters they’re now throwing flowers at the feet of…even if, in the end, humans continue to be what they are and they ultimately don’t care.
To wrap this up, Ted and Bill…if you’re reading this (and I’m sure you are) …given what I’ve seen of you already, I’m sure you’ll feel the need to retaliate because I’m simply reporting what you did. Just leave Kelly out of it. She’s no longer involved and doesn’t deserve to have you creeps following her throughout the rest of her life. If you feel so inclined to retaliate, then do so against me. I’m the one writing this, not her. Lie about me, defame me…I don’t really care. Frankly, I would feel worse if I left Craig alone in the wilderness as the only person with the balls to speak out about what’s really going on here.