FINAL CUT Released — Episode 1 — 9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom
More than 200 edits have been added to the "Public Orientation" Episode 1 of the C2C docuseries! And Episode 2 is just around the corner!
This is the latest and final version of Episode 1 — "9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom". We call it the Final Cut. It includes more than 200 additional edits including a music overhaul, great transitions between conversation turning points, supporting images & videos — all of which make it much more enjoyable to watch. We hope that you will share it with all of your family and friends.
(Note: You will need to register your email again for the FINAL CUT if you want to watch it since this is a newly posted C2C Episode 1 video.)
Episode 2 of 9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom is coming up in 2 weeks and will be entitled “The Grand Jury Meets WTC 7 Fires, and the Spectacle of NIST”. It will take us right into the Grand Jury board room where attorney Mick Harrison and architect Richard Gage, AIA, team up again to bring the evidence of World Trade Center Building 7, this time, straight to our virtual Grand Jurors. We introduce ourselves, our mission, our evidence, and our experts — and then we bring them the faulty official narrative of Building 7’s collapse delivered by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Project Leader, Shyam Sunder.
Several of our experts appear to counter the NIST narrative, including high-rise architect David Mack, Fire Protection Engineer Brendan Murphy, former Fire Chief Christopher Gioia, and the author of the textbook for fighting fires in structures, Captain Raul Angulo of the Seattle Fire Dept., Ret.
We hope that you will join us and Co-Produce 9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom:
And - do visit our website for 9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom:
Perfectly symmetrical collapse cannot be caused by asymmetrical damage. In my opinion, this statement when thought about should make it a slam dunk for a Grand Jury to solve whether or not a crime was committed, and or whether a crime was covered up.
Who did it? David Icke and Christopher Bollyn make good cases for who did it in their books.
Richard,
When the day comes that a grand jury sees your evidence, have you considered the following?:
1. Should a grand jury decide upon the whodunnit for criminal prosecution, isn't it possible that a failure to conclusively prove guilt by the perpetrator(s) could lead to the inability to then provide all of the conclusive scientific evidence of controlled demolitions, for example?
2. Have you considered asking a grand jury merely to look at NIST's evidence of WTC 7's collapse explanation to judge whether they've provided enough proof to conclude that office fires were able to lead to complete and symmetrical failure of all of the columns at the same time?