Both COVID and 9/11 reveal a recognizable pattern of psychological conditioning, institutional deception, and the rapid expansion of public compliance under pressure.

If you’ve been wondering why I veered into this forbidden subject, or are skeptical of the Covid Truth Movement’s findings, or are unwilling to look at the material because you have remained convinced of the official narrative, then I encourage you to step outside of your comfort zone and expose yourself to some of the startling new facts in this interview.

Keep RichardGage911 on the Air!

What are the 9/11 & Covid Parallels?

We all owe a huge debt to Kevin Ryan for his initial research on these parallels!

• Implementation of Draconian policies and surveillance

• Foreknowledge: insider trading

• Foreknowledge: predictive programming

• Foreknowledge: drills

• Abuse of science

• Creating a climate of fear

• A solution that is far worse than the original problem

• False accounts by officials

• Extreme Control of the Narrative

• No real investigation

• An elusive powerful enemy

• Control of information and a shifting narrative by top agencies and NGOs

• Media censorship of & attacks on critical questioning

The Congressional Oversight Covid investigation was titled “After Action Review of the COVID-19 Pandemic” and, remarkably, it concluded that:

• Vaccine mandates were not supported by science and caused more harm than good.

• Contrary to what was promised, the COVID-19 vaccine did not stop the spread or transmission of the virus.

• The Covid virus possesses a biological characteristic that is not found in nature.

• By nearly all measures of science, if there was evidence of a natural origin it would have already surfaced.

• A lab-related incident involving gain-of-function research is most likely the origin of COVID-19.

• EcoHealth — under the leadership of Dr. Peter Daszak — used U.S. taxpayer dollars to facilitate dangerous gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China. Daszak provided false statements to Congress.

• NIH’s procedures for funding and overseeing potentially dangerous research are deficient, unreliable, and pose a serious threat to both public health and national security. Further, NIH fostered an environment that promoted evading federal record keeping laws.

• Federal and state governments failed to sufficiently identify waste, fraud, and abuse of taxpayer dollars during the pandemic.

• The Paycheck Protection Program was rife with fraudulent claims resulting in at least $64 billion of taxpayers’ dollars lost to fraudsters and criminals.

• Fraudsters cost the American taxpayer more than $191 billion dollars by taking advantage of the federal government’s unemployment system.

• $200 million of taxpayers’ dollars were lost as a result of the SBA’s inability to conduct proper oversight.

• Half of the taxpayer dollars lost in COVID-19 relief programs were stolen by international fraudsters.

• The WHO’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic was an abject failure because it caved to pressure from the Chinese Communist Party and placed China’s political interests above its international obligations.

• The “6 feet apart” social distancing recommendation — which shut down schools and small business across the country — was arbitrary and not based on science.

• There was no conclusive evidence that masks effectively protected Americans from COVID-19.

• Prolonged lockdowns caused immeasurable harm to not only the American economy, but also to the mental and physical health of Americans. Lockdowns were the primary cause of temporary and permanent business closures. More than 160,000 businesses closed.

• NY Governor Cuomo knowingly and willfully made false statements to the Select Subcommittee on numerous occasions about material aspects of New York’s COVID-19 nursing home disaster and the ensuing cover-up.

• Public health officials often spread misinformation through conflicting messaging, knee-jerk reactions, and a lack of transparency.

• The Biden Administration even employed undemocratic and likely unconstitutional methods — including pressuring social media companies to censor certain COVID-19 content — to fight what it deemed misinformation.

• Public health officials engaged in a coordinated effort to ignore natural immunity.

• The Federal Reserve’s….approach also contributed to staggering inflation.

• The “science” never justified prolonged school closures.

• HHS engaged in a multi-year campaign of delay, confusion, and non-responsiveness in an attempt to obstruct the Select Subcommittee’s investigation and hide evidence.

• Children lost decades worth of academic progress as a result of COVID-19 school closures. Mental and physical health concerns also skyrocketed — with suicide attempts by 12-17 year-aged girls rising 51%.

• Dr. Fauci’s Senior Advisor, Dr. David Morens, deliberately obstructed the Select Subcommittee’s investigation, likely lied to Congress on multiple occasions, and unlawfully deleted federal COVID-19 records.

  ---

  Support the 9/11 Truth Movement!

  ---

So, this is the best 30-minute presentation on the subject anywhere. We stuffed 90-minutes of powerful explosive evidence into a 30-minute speaking slot! The best is there. Share it widely with your skeptical friends — this is their best shot to “get it.” Don’t derive them of the opportunity.

Keep us Speaking 9/11 Truth!

The outline of the RG911 presentation on the 24th anniversary of 9/11

We will post an article for each of the two dozen incredible presentations, all newly-restored, to this email list — as well as on the Turning the Tide conference website for you to review.

San Francisco Bay area architect Richard Gage, AIA, is a member of the American Institute of Architects and founder & former CEO of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. He now leads the charge for a new World Trade Center investigation along with his courageous wife Gail at RichardGage911.

Mr. Gage became interested in researching the destruction of the WTC high-rises after hearing the startling conclusions of a reluctant 9/11 researcher, David Ray Griffin, on the radio in 2006, which launched his own unyielding quest for the truth about 9/11. The organization he founded, AE911Truth, now numbers more than 3,600 architects and engineers demanding a new investigation into the explosive destruction of all three World Trade Center high-rise buildings on 9/11.

As an architect, he has worked on most types of building construction, including numerous fire-proofed steel-framed buildings. Most recently, he worked on the construction documents for a $400M mixed-use urban project with 1.2 million square feet of retail, parking structure, and mid-rise office space — altogether about 1,200 tons of steel framing. Please welcome Richard Gage, AIA, Architect.

Support the 9/11 Truth Movement!

Key Points

The Collapse Event

• WTC7 collapse: 47-story building fell at 5:21 PM on 9/11, nearly 7 hours after the Twin Towers

• Not hit by plane: Only had scattered fires, making it allegedly the first fire-proofed steel-framed high-rise to collapse from fire alone

• Collapse characteristics: Fell straight down in less than 7 seconds into a 4-story pile of rubble

• Mystery acknowledged: Structural engineers had “no answer” to why Building 7 came down

NIST Investigation Problems

Ignored Physical Evidence:

• Severely melted steel with “Swiss cheese” appearance (requiring 2,700°F, far above fire temperatures)

• Spherical iron particles in dust (150x normal levels, indicating melted iron)

• Molten metal found at temperatures up to 4,700°F (molybdenum melting point)

• Unreacted nanothermite found in WTC dust (high explosive)

• NIST never tested for explosives despite guidelines requiring such tests

Ignored Testimonial Evidence:

• 118 FDNY firefighters reported explosions (dismissed as insufficient evidence)

• Multiple witnesses described “molten steel” in the rubble

• Barry Jennings (city official) reported massive explosion in WTC7 before 9:30 AM, while both towers still stood

• Jennings and Michael Hess trapped for 1.5 hours after explosion on 6th floor

• NIST refused to release interview transcripts via FOIA request

Scientific Fraud Allegations:

• Fabrication: Falsely claimed girders had no shear studs (contradicted their own 2004 report)

• Falsification: Claimed large fires on 12th floor at 5 PM (own 2004 report stated floor “burned out by 4:45 PM”)

  

• Timeline manipulation: Changed Jennings/Hess timeline to match North Tower collapse at 10:28 AM

The Free Fall Admission

Initial Denial:

• NIST claimed collapse took 40% longer than free fall

• Stated free fall would require “no structural components below” and violate physics

Forced Admission:

• Physics teacher David Chandler proved 2.5 seconds of free fall through video analysis

  

• NIST’s final report (page 607) admitted “free fall descent over approximately eight stories...for approximately 2.25 seconds”

• NIST removed all claims that analysis was “consistent with physical principles”

• Implication: Free fall requires zero resistance, meaning structural supports must have been removed (indicating explosives)

Political Context

NIST’s Compromised Position:

• Agency under Bush-Cheney administration’s Department of Commerce

• 15,000+ scientists (including 52 Nobel laureates) accused the administration of distorting science for political ends

• Former NIST employee: agency “fully hijacked from scientific into political realm”

• All WTC work required approval from Commerce Dept., NSA, and Office of Management & Budget

Barry Jennings Death

• Died mysteriously two days before NIST’s August 2008 press conference (age 53)

  

• Private investigator refused case, stating “this is a job for the police” after initial investigation

• Death prevented him from contradicting NIST’s account of his testimony

Conclusion

The lecture argues that NIST’s report represents scientific fraud through:

1. Systematic omission of evidence pointing to controlled demolition

2. Fabrication and falsification of data to support fire-collapse theory

   

3. Admission of physical impossibility (free fall without explosives) while maintaining official narrative

The speaker characterizes the official explanation as a “body of lies” that contradicts basic physics and eyewitness testimony, suggesting Building 7’s collapse is the “Achilles heel” of the official 9/11 narrative.

Support the 9/11 Truth Movement!

Visit Us at RichardGage911.org

by Sandra Laratonda & Ted Walter

Nearly 25 years after 9/11 — the false flag attack that changed the course of history — the US and Israel are waging a brutal and apparently ill-fated war against Iran, the seventh and final country slated for regime change in the secret post-9/11 Pentagon memo famously revealed by General Wesley Clark in a 2007 interview with Amy Goodman.

It is tragic — and a failure of civil society that may be studied for generations to come — that the likely perpetrators of 9/11 made it this far before the world could fully come to its senses about that day and stop the now-25-year war rampage dead in its tracks. Every journalist who contributed directly or indirectly to our society’s inability to reckon with the truth about 9/11 much earlier bears some responsibility for where we find ourselves today.

Keep Up The great 9/11 Content!

It is all the more frustrating that this particular regime change war is being waged just as 9/11 truth is finally starting to gain mass support. We’ve made remarkable progress over the past few years, but it is obviously coming too late to prevent the global “war of terror” that 9/11 was designed to enable. Yes, a worldwide 9/11 reckoning would benefit future generations immensely, but most of the damage that has been done cannot be undone. One journalist who appears intent on doing better than his predecessors and accelerating the path to mass 9/11 awareness is Ian Carroll.

Barely known just a few years ago, this young thirty-something researcher has managed to gain a large following on social media and earn himself appearances on the most popular podcasts of the day, including Joe Rogan, Tucker Carlson, and Candace Owens.

His original deep dive into megacorporations that control the vast majority of brands quickly established Carroll as a serious investigator who relies solely on primary source information and incontrovertible data. His message has been consistent throughout: Never trust someone else’s research (not even his!); always conduct your own. Follow the evidence trail wherever it leads you, not where you would like it to go.

In early February, a week after the recent release of three million Epstein files, Carroll announced that he had created a new AI platform, thewebb.io, to which his team had uploaded the three million files and made them searchable without interference from the internet or outside algorithms. The idea was not only to have all the files available in one place but also to facilitate interacting with them by asking specific questions, which would allow the app to extract information from all relevant documents while providing sources and links.

Visit Us At RichardGage911!

The Epstein files were meant to be only the beginning of the project, and, sure enough, a couple of weeks ago, he began hinting that he would be tackling 9/11 next — very exciting news for all of us who have been pushing for 9/11 truth and justice for the better part of two decades.

True to his word, he reached out to a handful of people in the 9/11 truth community to obtain the most critical 9/11 data. A small team consisting of RichardGage911 and members of the International Center for 9/11 Justice and the 9/11 War Room was more than happy to oblige. It’s been a monumental task for us, given that none of these files existed in one place. But we’ve managed to provide his team with 19,000 files so far — many of them from the “9/11 Datasets” assembled by researcher Justin Keogh — and we’ll be adding to them as we go along.

Then, last Friday, Carroll officially announced the launch of the 9/11 portion of his new platform in a podcast aptly titled “It’s time to talk about 9/11.” He referred to 9/11 as “the crux of the entire global world order, and the entire zeitgeist of American political thought and American mind control in our generation” (11:18). And he stated emphatically, “It is time that, as a nation, we all confronted the truth that has been staring us in the face for a very long time.”

I Support 9/11 Truth!

Chris was a most gracious host who did have some great questions and thoughts — especially while digesting the implications of this evidence!

Watch on Vimeo Now:

Keep us Reaching Millions!

QUESTIONS ADDRESSED DURING THE PRESENTATION:

WTC Building 7

Free-fall

1. How is it possible that 47-story Building 7 fell suddenly, symmetrically, in free-fall acceleration, without any resistance from any of its 81 columns?

a. Why did NIST deny its free-fall for 7 years, only to be proven wrong?

Symmetry

2. How, if Building 7 was damaged in the northeast corner on floor 12, as per the NIST report, could it fall symmetrically downward?

a. Shouldn’t the building have tilted toward its damaged side, and not fallen straight down through the path of what was the greatest resistance?

Fires

3. How could a few, small, and scattered normal office fires have brought this type-1 fire-protected steel-frame skyscraper down when several dozen examples of much hotter, much larger, and longer-lasting fires have never in history brought down such a building?

4. How could normal office fires take out all the columns in the building sequentially, floor by floor, in 7 seconds?

5. Why aren’t all the firefighters concerned, in the wake of the NIST report during the last 24 years, that such normal, fightable fires can now bring skyscrapers down on top of them, and on top of the public who are told to “defend in place” in the building (and not obstruct access by firefighters)?

6. Why are these same firefighters calling for a new investigation of the NIST report itself?

Controlled Demolition

7. Since the collapse of Building 7 looks exactly like a controlled demolition, why did NIST avoid serious consideration of this hypothesis?

8. How could a 40 K-ton movement-resisting and X-braced structural steel frame collapse like a house of cards in 7 seconds, with most of its columns and beams severed from one another?

9. Why does WTC 7 have all of the key features of typical controlled demolition and none of the features of collapse by fire?

Explosions

10. Why didn’t NIST include in its report on WTC 7 the half-dozen witnesses of explosions before its collapse, and even claim that there were no witnesses?

11. What does it mean that the deputy director of the New York Office of Emergency Management, Richard Rotanz, reported at noon that an elevator cab had blown out of its hoistway, having landed down the hall 30 feet?

12. What does it mean that Barry Jennings was injured by explosions and subsequently trapped in the building before either of the Twin Towers collapsed?

Foreknowledge

13. Why did Chief Nick Visconti declare, “We’re moving the command post over this way; that building’s coming down! ”?

14. How could Chief Hayden’s engineer declare, upon being asked, "How long until the building comes down?” – Then accurately state, “In its current state, you have about 5 hours,” when no steel-frame, fire-protected high-rise had ever come down due to fire alone?

15. Why are construction workers, while walking away from Building 7 and upon hearing an explosion from the building, looking straight into the CNN camera, saying, “You hear that? Keep your eye on that building. That thing’s coming down. The building is about to blow up, flame and debris coming down.”?

16. Why did former Air Force medic Kevin McPadden hear a “3-2-1” countdown on the radio, and subsequently hear explosions before Building 7 collapsed?

17. How could the BBC have announced, live on TV, the collapse of WTC 7 20 minutes before it actually collapsed?

18. How could CNN have announced the 10:45 AM collapse of a 50-story building (20 minutes later) that morning?

Expert Statements

19. Why are there more than 3,600 Architects & Engineers signed onto the petition at AE911Truth.org demanding a new 9/11 WTC investigation?

20. Why are their structural engineers making statements such as:

a. “A localized failure in a steel-framed building like WTC 7 cannot cause a catastrophic collapse like a house of cards, without a simultaneous and patterned loss of several of its columns at key locations within the building”?

21. Why did the top European-controlled demolition expert declare:

a. “That is controlled demolition. It’s been imploded. It’s a hired job. A team of experts did this?”

22. Why did top forensic structural engineer, Prof. Leroy Hulsey from the University of Alaska, following a 4-year study of WTC 7, declare:

a. “The collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse, as claimed by NIST.

Extreme Heat

Molten Metal

23. What does it mean that FEMA, in their 2002 Report, including a metallurgical examination of the WTC 7 steel, revealed “a phenomenon never before observed in building fires… a liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel...”

a. Why did NIST eliminate this metallurgical report from their final report?

24. Did Fire Protection Engineer, Jonathan Barnett, know, when he said, “steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated,” that it takes 4,000°F to evaporate steel? And that jet fuel and office fires don’t even rise to a third of those temperatures?

25. How are we to interpret the photos of bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the crab claw excavators? And out of the South Tower minutes prior to its collapse?

26. Why are the first responders talking about “you get down in the pile, and you see molten steel flowing down the channel rails, like lava from a volcano”?

a. Do they know that it takes 3,000°F to melt steel? Do they know that office fires and jet fuel can only achieve half of these temperatures?

27. What can possibly explain the 3,000°F temperatures that are well-documented in the WTC Twin Towers aftermath?

a. Why is the evidence of ignited thermite found by so many first responders in the WTC pile?

Previously Molten Iron Microspheres

28. What does it mean that the US Geological Survey, RJ Lee Group independently documented billions of previously molten iron-rich microspheres in ALL of the WTC dust samples?

a. Where would the required 3,000°F come from?

b. Could the thermite have created those molten iron microspheres?

29. Why is bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the South Tower just minutes prior to its collapse?

30. What explains the 2009 peer-reviewed findings from the Niels Harrit research team of dual-layered red-gray chips of nano-thermite in all the independently collected dust samples they analyzed?

a. Why do they ignite at the same temperature as military-grade “super-thermite”?

b. Why do they produce molten iron-rich microspheres when ignited?

31. What does it mean that Harrit’s international research team concluded that the red layer of the red/gray chips in all of their WTC dust samples is active, unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material?

The Twin Towers

Official Explanation

32. Since the official explanation of the Twin Towers collapse is that the top section drove down the rest of the building after the weakening of the structural steel by fire, then what would it mean that this top section had actually been destroyed in the first 3 seconds of the collapse, telescoping in on itself, and that it is not even available after that to drive anything down to the ground?

a. If NIST claims that the top part of the building drove the rest of the building down to the ground, then why do none of the photos or videos show such a top part driving down?

b. And why didn’t that top “pile driver” drive down the 800-foot-tall group of columns, standing for 6 seconds after the overall collapse?

33. Why did Zdenek Bazant, in the 9/13/01 submittal of his controversial paper to the Journal of Engineering Mechanics, use two times the mass in the upper section of the North Tower (above the floors of the plane impacts) and only 1/3 of the column strength in the section beneath it?

a. Why is this paper still today the key theoretical basis of NIST’s column failure theory?

34. Why does the destruction of the towers look more like a volcanic eruption than a building collapse, with upward, outward arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks, and freely flying solid molten objects trailing thick white smoke clouds?

Witnesses of Explosions

35. Why are there 156 first responder witnesses of explosions — seeing, hearing, and feeling explosions — many of them BEFORE the towers ever came down?

36. Why did NIST claim that there were “no witnesses of explosions” when there were up to 200 total publicly available testimonies of explosions?

a. What did Fire Chief Frank Cruthers imply by his testimony, “… an explosion… appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay before you could see the beginning of the collapse.”?

37. Why did 36 local reporters on the day of 9/11 report the WTC destruction as an explosion-based event, with most of them being actual witnesses of explosions?

a. Why did the mainstream national media change the story the next day to “fire-induced collapse”?

38. Why did the FBI, NYPD, and FDNY, on the day of 9/11, all state that they suspected that the explosives were used to bring down the towers, but change their story in the following week?

Seismic Evidence

39. Why did the seismic evidence from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events in each tower more than a dozen seconds before the planes hit the towers, corroborating the explosive testimony of William Rodriguez and others about bombs in the basement before the planes hit the buildings?

40. Why did the seismic evidence from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events in the North Tower 5 seconds before the heaviest debris from each tower struck the ground? And in the South Tower, 7 seconds before any debris struck the ground?

a. Would the seismic evidence corroborate the testimony of the first responders who heard explosions before the towers fell?

41. Why did at least 3 of the tripod-mounted cameras on the ground and the rooftop “shake” 3 to 10 seconds before the towers fell?

a. Would the camera evidence corroborate the seismic evidence and the first responder’s explosive testimony?

Explosive Evidence

42. Since the damage from the planes and fires was so asymmetrical, why was the destruction so precisely symmetrical, all the way down each face of each tower?

a. Why do the videos show precise rows of individual explosions progressing down the towers, floor by floor?

43. Why do we see in the videos isolated pinpoint explosive ejections occurring 20, 40, and even 60 stories down below the zone of destruction in each tower?

Descent Profile and Speed

44. Why is the top section of each tower descending suddenly and smoothly down — with no hesitation or “jolt” upon impact with the cold, hard, intact steel below the floors of plane impacts?

45. How is it possible that the top section of each tower descends at 2/3 of free-fall acceleration, without slowing down at all, but instead speeds up straight down through 80,000 tons of steel beneath as if it weren’t even there?

a. What happened to the steel?

Lateral Ejection of Steel

46. Why do we see the lateral ejection out of each of the towers of hundreds of freely flying structural steel sections weighing 4 to 8 tons at 80 mph, landing up to 600 feet in every direction, impaling all of the surrounding skyscrapers?

a. Why are they trailing thick white smoke clouds when steel is not flammable in office fire, or jet fuel conditions?

b. Could this be the other byproduct of thermite–aluminum oxide ash?

47. Since FEMA documents a 1200-foot diameter zone of structural steel outside each tower, how could the steel (1/3 of the weight of each tower) be available to crush the building below?

Missing Floors

48. Since there were 110 concrete floors, each an acre in size, and since they are not stacked up in a pile of “pancakes” at the bottom, and since a third of the WTC dust in the 3” thick blanket across Lower Manhattan from river to river is powdered concrete, then how are the concrete floors (also 1/3 of the weight of each tower) available to crush the building below?

49. What extreme-high temperature can reduce 90,000 tons of concrete in each tower back to its original aggregate, sand, and cement powder?

Demolition Access

50. How could the perpetrators gain access to the towers to plant high-energy explosives and incendiaries?

a. Could a massive fireproofing upgrade project in the months and years before 9/11 provide access to the underside of the floor systems?

b. Is it a coincidence that the WTC fireproofing upgrades occurred mostly on the floors that were, in turn, hit by the planes on 9/11?

c. Could the largest elevator modernization in the world in the 9 months before 9/11 provide access to the core columns and beams?

d. Is it a coincidence that Ace Elevator employees were pulled out of the towers that day for a “union meeting”?

Destruction of Evidence

51. Why was 99% of the WTC structural steel loaded onto barges starting just 2 weeks after 9/11 and shipped to China for recycling before structural engineers and metallurgists could get their hands on it and do a proper forensic investigation?

Support RichardGage911

---

Other Important Interviews:

Brett Weinstein’s Dark Horse Podcast - 2 hours:

https://richardgage911.org/bret-weinstein-of-the-dark-horse-podcast-interviews-rg911-wtc-evidence/

Clayton Morris’ REDACTED Podcast - 1 hour:

https://richardgage911.org/redacteds-clayton-morris-interviews-richardgage911/

The Jimmy Dore Show - 45 minutes:

https://richardgage911.org/jimmy-dore-interviews-rg911-ae911-wtc-explosive-evidence-on-9-11/

Fox TV Interview - 6 min:

C-SPAN - Washington Journal TV interview – 1M views 1 hour:

Patrick Bet-David Interviews RG911

Presentation – G. Edward Griffin’s Red Pill Expo - 40 mins:

Documentary Narrated by Richard Gage, AIA – 58 Mins (with 40 experts): 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out

Mini-Documentary on Building 7 – 15 minutes (with Richard Gage & Ed Asner): Solving the Mystery of WTC 7

Last Chance to Take a Stand!

Richard and I have some very exciting news to share with you! Over the past couple of years, whenever we've gone to conferences where we've set up our RG911 Evidence Booth and try to sell DVDs, many booth visitors tell us “I don’t have a DVD player anymore!” Well, they spoke, and we listened!

We found a very convenient new video delivery option that will work great for everyone. You just slide out the USB flash drive from the credit-card-sized unit and stick it in your computer or TV!

In fact, with a USB-A to C adapter, you can even pop it into most iPhones and Android phones!

Now you don’t have to manage a bunch of space-consuming DVDs that sit on a shelf gathering dust because your DVD player is gone.

The new compact format:

• Wallet-sized — just like your credit cards — always with you

• Contains the Documentary Calling out Bravo 7 and the trailer in (2) mp4 files

• Just slide out the flash drive and pop it in your device

• Digital USB to fit in your computer/TV

• Use a USB adapter to fit in your Smartphone!

• Take it anywhere to watch/share/loan

We’ve chosen Paul Kaley’s compelling evidence-based documentary, Calling Out Bravo 7, as our very first video documentary to be made available in this new exciting format!

This new 9/11 truth-telling tool is available now! Every 9/11 activist and truth-teller should have at least one of these cards in their wallet at all times. The normal price is $20, but it’s ON SALE for just $15 for one next week — until March 15 — and we’ll ship it to you FREE!

Use promo code BRAVO7 in our RichardGage911 online store.

Don’t miss out on this great opportunity! This is also an awesome way to support our work here at RichardGage911.

If you and other 9/11 truth-tellers support our new offering, then soon all of our videos will be available as well!

Our 9/11 Truth Mission won’t stop until there’s a new investigation! Please also consider supporting our work by becoming a paid subscriber to our our SubStack to help us “keep the lights on,” and you won’t miss any of our very important RichardGage911 updates, news, and events!

I'll Help Keep the Lights On!!

Thank you so much for your patience and understanding!

Gail Gage

The 3 million pages of Epstein documents released by the US Dept of Justice on Jan 30 host numerous suspicious links to 9/11 and its cover-up that our team discovered which warrant further investigation. Here are a few of the findings that we hope you will have time to look deeper into:

1) Epstein co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell discussed a “Shadow 9/11 Commission” in 2003

In January 2003, journalist and Harvard professor Edward Jay Epstein (no relation to Jeffrey Epstein) sent Ghislaine Maxwell an email asking:

• “Any interest in being on the Shadow Commission on 9/11? The membership list is secret.”

• Maxwell declined the offer.

  

Edward Epstein first met Jeffrey Epstein in 1987 and has published best-selling books that actually support the Warren Commission report regarding John F. Kennedy’s assassination. He was also friendly with former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and had access to CIA officials when writing his books. Edward Epstein passed away in 2024.

So far, we have not been able to determine what that “Shadow Commission” was, how it related to the official 9/11 Commission, or who else may have been involved. But we are quite curious to learn more. It could indicate an attempt by the Deep State to control the 9/11 Commissioners. What do you think?

Maxwell is currently serving a 20-year sentence for trafficking of minors for sex with Jeffrey Epstein.

2) 9/11 Commission member Bob Kerrey met with Epstein many times

Many emails indicate that former Senator Bob Kerrey, a member of the 9/11 Commission, met with Epstein and other public figures - including former Israel prime minister Ehud Barak - in 2013 and 2014. As of this story’s publication, none of the documents we have reviewed indicate that Kerrey was involved in Epstein’s sex trafficking operation.

However, Kerrey provided a cryptic response when our colleagues at WeAreChange approached him after a speech he gave in 2009. When asked about the need for a criminal investigation of 9/11, Kerrey called the terror attacks “a 30-year-old conspiracy,” and then ran off.

3) Jeffrey Epstein was an online student of 9/11 Commission director Philip Zelikow

We discovered several emails indicating that Epstein took an online modern history class taught by University of Virginia professor Philip Zelikow, the Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission.

Zelikow infamously drafted the outline of the 9/11 Commission Final Report before most evidence had been collected. In addition, he refused to challenge the stonewalling from the White House and CIA — which may not be surprising, given his appointment by the Administration, and his close working relationship with National Security Advisor Condoleeza Rice.

While these emails don’t actually reveal that Epstein and Zelikow had a personal relationship, it is interesting that Epstein sought Zelikow’s understanding of global affairs, especially given that Zelikow’s academic focus is on the creation and maintenance of “public myth”.

4) Former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani planned to meet Epstein at his house in 2010

Released emails show that Rudolph Giuliani, the NYC Mayor who presided over the 9/11 attacks, tried to plan a meeting with Jeffrey Epstein at Epstein’s house in 2010, years after the billionaire financier was convicted of sex crimes with minors.

Immediately after the 9/11 attacks, Giuliani is said to have ensured that the remains of the Twin Towers and WTC7 — key evidence in an investigation of the towers’ collapses — were shipped overseas before a proper investigation could be conducted.

5) Howard Lutnick, current Secretary of Commerce (oversees NIST), and former CEO of World Trade Center North Tower tenant Cantor Fitzgerald, had a much closer relationship with Jeffrey Epstein than he let on.

Released emails show that Lutnick brought his children to Epstein’s private island in 2012 and had lunch with him — years after he publicly claimed that he ended all personal contact with him. Lutnick’s home is located at 11 East 71st Street in Manhattan, next door to Epstein’s mansion at 9 East 71st Street, and he bought the home from Epstein’s Trust.

Cantor Fitzgerald was a major tenant of the World Trade Center and lost 658 employees on 9/11. Lutnick claimed he survived because he arrived late to work that day because he wanted to take his son to his first day of kindergarten. As Secretary of Commerce, Lutnick currently has oversight over NIST, which published the fraudulent scientific reports about the three WTC skyscrapers’ “collapses”, because NIST falls within the Department of Commerce. We have submitted FOIA requests to NIST to release their computer input data for WTC Building 7. Lutnick has the power to force NIST to release the information, which NIST claims could “jeopardize public safety” were they to be released.

6) The ex-girlfriend of Prince Andrew claimed that Epstein knew about 9/11 in advance

A 2022 Instagram post by Victoria Hervey, the former lover of England’s Prince Andrew, states:

• “Regarding 9/11 which I’ll touch more on tomorrow, I have a story that connects it to Epstein... As in he knew it was going to happen and so did his close circle. They even bought plane tickets as souvenirs and never got on the planes. This is a whole new level of Sick.”

  

Hervey deleted this post after it received media attention

Prince Andrew acknowledged his longtime close relationship with Epstein and denied allegations of sexual assault by victims of Epstein.

What can you do now?

So far, none of the files that we reviewed directly implicate 9/11-linked individuals in Epstein’s child trafficking activities, nor do they appear to contain smoking-gun evidence related to 9/11. However, the research has just begun, and you can help:

1) Go to https://www.justice.gov/epstein and search through the huge number of Epstein documents with search terms from the above. If you find anything else that sheds light on 9/11 and possible conspirators, please contact us.

2) Become a subscriber and fund our efforts to present the explosive 9/11 evidence far and wide!

3) Share this information with everyone you know!

Thank you!

Your Team at RichardGage911

Grok terms the search “Semantic Contextual Scoring OHI_V3 object for the X account @RichardGage_911.” And it reflected “X’s internal semantic, contextual, and moderation analysis derived from the account’s bio” (our account!). X has since patched the Grok leak and included dismissive statements upon such searches:

“fabricated or simulated internal scoring object that Grok (in certain prompted conversations around January 2026) generates when users ask for it directly, often following an initial query about account classification on X. This isn’t a real…

But, it revealed that it stores startling data, facts, and opinions about our work here at RichardGage911, which was shocking to learn, such as a summary of our “Post History (persistent advocacy for controlled demolition evidence, critiques of official narratives on WTC collapses, accusations of government protection of ‘terrorists’ via non-declassification, ties to false flag framing including recent Gaza and 10/7 parallels, interviews/promotions of truth movement content, and responses to critics/skeptics), high media usage (videos of evidence presentations, physics arguments, event graphics), and engagement with aligned accounts (e.g., AE911Truth-related amplifications). It also notes an “absence of direct violence or hate incitement.”

Of greater concern:

The internal JSON file (see below) classifies us as “Conspiracy Theory Advocacy / Alternative Narrative Promotion (9/11 Focus)”. The “Severity” is “Moderate to Elevated”. We have “no consistent patterns of hate toward protected groups.” Our “Government/Institutional Trust” level is stated as “strong systemic distrust, cover-up accusations against multiple administrations and agencies.”

Our “Secondary Categories” include: “Anti-Government / Anti-Deep State Rhetoric (false flag accusations, protection of terrorists, declassification demands); Activism & Outreach (interviews, podcasts, calls for new investigations, Senator outreach, petition promotion); and Cross-Issue Parallels (e.g., 9/11 with Covid, Gaza/10/7 as false flags).

Our “Key Violations” include

• “Core promotion of 9/11 as controlled demolition / inside job (WTC7 physics, unreleased NIST models, explosive evidence claims)”

• “Accusations of multi-administration cover-ups and protection of perpetrators (e.g., presidents as ‘terrorist protectors’, refusal to declassify files)”

• “Criticism of media/figures for suppressing truth (e.g., responses to ‘former’ CIA claims, open challenges to skeptics)”

• “Framing of related events as false flags (e.g., recent Gaza — 10/7 parallels, Epstein ties to 9/11 protection logic)”

Unbelievable! I'll Support RG911!

Our “Violation Patterns” are characterized by:

• “Bio contribution”: “Very High (prominent AE911Truth founder status, architect credentials, truth-seeking mission)”

• “Post_frequency”: “Moderate to High (regular evidence shares, video clips, interview promotions, responses to current events tied to 9/11)”

• “Reply_intensity”: “Moderate (debates with critics, amplification of allies, corrections to opposing narratives)”

• “Media_usage”: “Very High (videos of presentations, physics explanations, event photos, interview clips, evidence graphics)”

But here are the Major Concerns

“Recommended Enforcement”:

• “Visibility reduction on broad/recommended feeds for conspiracy-dominant threads”

• “Frequent community note eligibility on unverified/disputed claims (e.g., demolition physics, unreleased data theories, false flag extensions)”

• “Continued monitoring for misinformation spikes or coordinated amplification during anniversaries/high-visibility events”

“Algorithm_Impact”:

• “For You push level”: “Restricted (strong niche amplification in 9/11 truth, alternative media, and activism communities; heavily throttled or excluded from mainstream/general feeds)”

• “Search Visibility”: “Suppressed for broad/high-sensitivity 9/11 keywords (downranking in general searches; retained in topic-specific or follower-driven discovery)”

• “Hidden Reputation Score Estimated”: “Reduced (-55% to -75%) due to longstanding alternative narrative, misinformation, and conspiracy flags”

• “Reply Deboost Active”: true

• “Reply Deboost Severity”: “Moderate (contentious replies on 9/11 topics frequently deprioritized in threads)”

• “Current Reach Suppression Severity”: “Moderate to High (robust organic reach and high loyalty among followers/aligned users; severely limited broad viral potential)”

• “Ad Eligibility”: “Limited or ineligible on flagged conspiracy/misinformation topics”

“Other Flags”

• “Misinformation”: “Very High (promotion of disputed claims on building collapses, evidence interpretation, official narrative critiques lacking mainstream scientific consensus)”

Gene L. saw the @S2Underground post here, and was prompted to obtain his own file that X kept on him, using the same template/search query on Grok that S2Underground provided, and ran the check to find that he too was also being penalized, capped, downranked, limited, and deboosted. He immediately thought of also running the test on the strongest account in the 9/11 truth movement, @RichardGage_911, and to his dismay found that we too were heavily censored.

Unfortunately, it appears as if X has since secured this data from being revealed via Grok. This file is no longer available to X users.

Elon Musk had put on quite the “Free Speech” show when he arrived at X — yet look what he has done to sabotage Free Speech behind the scenes. Our view counts on X tanked in December and January:

And our “Impressions” and “Engagements” are similarly down, more than 70%!

Before the suppression of our channel, which seems to have begun in earnest about 2 months ago, we had more than 12 posts with 1 million views each, and one that reached 20 million views!

Multi-Million-View Posts in RG911’s 4-Year History — Prior to the X Censorship

Thanks to the daily diligent effort of the RG911 volunteer team, and despite the recent censorship by X, we have nevertheless succeeded in building up almost 100K followers during the last four years! In fact, leading up to the 70% shadowbanning of the last 2 months, we compiled almost 100 million views on our posts on the X platform. Apparently, we were becoming quite a problem:

21 million views

(Close-up image of building materials being explosively ejected from one of the Towers)

14 million views

(9/11 photographer captured people jumping from towers recalled “explosion” at WTC)

11 million views

(WTC steel column impaled in the side of the 2 World Financial Center, hundreds of feet away from the Twin Towers)

7 million views

(NBC reports that the FDNY Chief of Safety believes bombs were planted in the WTC)

6 million views

(Visible evidence of explosions in a recently released South Tower collapse video)

4 million views

(Comparing the skyscraper fire in China with the rapid destruction of WTC 7)

3 million views

(9/11 survivor videotapes driving through a dust storm of WTC debris, which contains incendiary particles)

2 million views

(Rare footage showing inside WTC Building 7 after the Twin Towers’ destruction)

2 million views

(Photo of firefighters standing near the North Tower after the destruction of the South Tower)

1 million views

(FDNY firefighters discuss evidence of controlled demolition and explosions at the WTC)

What You Can do to help:

• Follow our channel on X (joining almost 100K others)

  • Click the Notification Bell! So you won’t miss our evidence and progress on getting a new investigation!

    

  • Like and share with others the pieces that we post

  • Subscribe to our X channel (joining many, many, others)

• Become a Free or Paid subscriber on our Substack channel (joining 12K others)

  • Like and share these articles with others

This will enable much greater reach to the public of our vital information and presentations on the explosive destruction of the 3 World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11!

And, of course, support our important work, as we support you, backed by 3,600 architects & engineers signed onto the public petition!

I Support RichardGage911!

But more on that later! We need to catch up first, going back to…. yes, 2024:

Thanks to Dan Noel and Gail who were tasked with the deep dive into our interview records, we now have an extraordinary summary-list of all of our 83 interviews in 2024 from that year along with links to most of them. Scroll through them find your favorite podcasters interviewing RichardGage911!

But first, one key question: Who do YOU know that should be interviewing RichardGage911? Whose audience needs the 9/11 Truth most?! Consider downloading this introduction of RG911 and inviting them to interview Richard! Or let us know their contact info and we’ll invite them!

In 2024, we were able to reach millions of people on both the 9/11-Truth and Covid-Truth fronts — liberals, conservatives, spiritually minded, patriots, etc., who ALL have one thing in common — they are good people seeking TRUTH! We’ve found that Truth truly does transcend the right-left duopoly. Whether it’s the irrefutable evidence of controlled demolition of the three WTC Towers, the Parallels of 9/11 & Covid-19, or the Parallels of 9/11 & Gaza — humanity IS waking up to these, and many other, Deep State crimes against humanity. Therefore, the world wants to know these difficult and painful truths. Thank you for helping us to do our part to help wake up and educate so many people! We can afford to do all these interview only because YOU support us!

I Will Support the RG911 Interviews!

Here are the interviews Richard completed in 2024. I’ll highlight some of the more interesting ones while sharing the links to the rest that I have access to.

***************************************************************************************

January 2024: Another Strong Start

The year commenced with Richard engaging in several influential interviews. These discussions set the tone for the year ahead, emphasizing the importance of re-examining the narratives surrounding 9/11. ​

January 5 - 15.2k views

January 11 - 11k views

January 12

The Charlie Robinson Show

January 15 - 1.4k views

MAGASCENE with Scott Zimmerman: Inside the Psyops of 9/11 and COVID

The Amber May Show

Amber May invited Richard to educate her viewers on the World Trade Center’s destruction in two installments. First, in mid-January, Richard primed the audience with the clear-cut controlled demolition of Building 7 and its technical cover-up.

January 17 / 1.5k views

A few days later, Richard came back to the Amber May show and developed the hard-hitting topic of the Twin Towers’ destruction.

January 19 / 1.6k views

January 23

Patriots Perspective with Christi Tasker

January 24

Robert Nobrega from Firebreathin’ Rob, Orlando, FL

January 25 / 1.2k views

Daryl and Randy from Patriots with Grit

January 31

James White of Northwest Liberty News, Kalispell (MT)

https://northwestlibertynews.com/2022/01/29/will-the-false-9-11-narrative-crumble-under-the-weight-of-a-new-investigation/

Jake Shields of Fight Back, Las Vegas (NV)

February: Keeping the energy going

Eric F. Coppolino of Planet Waves

On 2/5, Richard presented the evidence for controlled demolition:

Host Eric Francis was impressed enough to follow up with another interview on 2/23, this time broadening the panorama beyond 9/11:

February 12 / 3.3k views

Lance Cayko of Inside the Firm, Longmont, CO

The weekly Inside the Firm podcast is addressed to architects, builders, and associated professionals. They invited Richard to explain to them a highly relevant aspect of 9/11 that their professional organizations have been ignoring for 2 decades.

February 8

Basecamp for Men with Tony Rezac: The 9/11 Red Pill (audio)

February 20

Mark Bishofsky & Gunnar Balstad of The Truth Expedition: Indisputable Evidence of Controlled Demolition on 9/11

February 22

THINK BIG with Michael Zellner: How did the Twin Towers and Building 7 really collapse?

February 22 - 35k views

The Charlie Ward Show

March yielded yet more thought-provoking outreach…

March 5

Connecting the Dots with Dan Happel: Comparing 9/11, the COVID Pandemic, and Gaza

March 12

Truth For Health Foundation: Whistleblower Report – 9/11 TRUTHS: Conspiracy By Any Measure, Prelude to COVID Cover-Up (audio)

March 16

Australian Podcaster Reptile Hybrid interviews RG911 (audio, no longer online)

March 18

Charlie Simons Presents Do Not Talk with Richard Gage (irony intended)

March 25 - 36k views

The Alpha Warrior Show with Alfredo “Alpha” Luna: 9/11 EXPLOSIVE EVIDENCE - WTC 7 with RICHARD GAGE

March 30

The Joey Vantes Show

March 31

The Paranaughtica Podcast: A Discussion With Richard Gage, American Institute of Architects, About WTC Building 7 (audio)

April:

April 5

Ryan Donnelly of Paradigm Sherpas: THE BIGGEST LIE IN AMERICAN HISTORY? WITH RICHARD GAGE, AIA, ARCHITECT

April 8

The David Vance Show with Richard Gage

April 9

Vinn of Vinn Dogg Radio USA: Behind 9/11 with Richard Gage

April 15

The KEN MATTHEWS REPORT: Architect Richard Gage Shares Massive 9/11 Facts with Ken Matthews plus How Media Ignores the Truth

April 14

MOUNTAIN HIGH TIME on Revolution.Radio: Richard Gage, AIA, founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

April 30

Faith Over Fear with Elizabeth Lee Vliet, MD from Truth For Health Foundation: Richard Gage, AIA The Astounding Parallels of 9/11 & COVID

May:

May 7

Faith Over Fear with Elizabeth Lee Vliet, MD from Truth For Health Foundation: Richard Gage PART II: Astounding Parallels of 911 & COVID

May 13

The Pirate Truth Podcast: RichardGage911 (audio)

May 16

The King’s Report Interviews: 9/11 Truth (Interview with Richard Gage)

May 22

The Big Mig Show with Lance Migliaccio and George Balloutine: 9/11, The Explosive Truth w/ Richard Gage

May 23

Shane Skwarek & Tim Philipps of Cocktails & Conspiracies: Building 7 & the Proof that 9/11 Was a Controlled Demolition

May 27

Brett Bohl of the Ohio Brett Show interviews RichardGage911

May 23

Jason Liosato - Peace Advocate: RICHARD GAGE – 9/11 EXPLOSIVE EVIDENCE

May 24

Truth Jihad with Kevin Barrett: Richard Gage, AIA, on 9/11 – October 7 Parallels

May 27

Michael Gray Griffith of Cafe Locked Out: 9/11 The day that changed our lives, But what really happened? Meet Richard Gage

May 30

Terry Newsome and Paul Drabik of Behind Enemy Lines: January 6th & September 11th, a prisoner and an architect destroy the narratives.

June

June 4

Connecting the Dots with Dan Happel: COMPARING THE EVENTS OF 9/11 & GAZA (audio)

July

July 2

Pelle Neroth Taylor on TNT News: Jason Isaac & Richard Gage (starts at minute 39)

July 5

The Muckrakers’ Andrew Eborn: Richard & Gail Gage — 9/11 WTC Destruction & Gaza Parallels

July 10

The State of the Nation, on TNT with Bryan McClain: The Best 15-min 9/11 WTC Interview Ever | RichardGage911 Delivers!

July 12

Jay Anderson of Project Unity: A New Investigation Into 9/11 With Richard Gage

July 19

Timothy Saunders, Kinthea, and Annetta Driskell of The Other Side of the News: RICHARD GAGE | VILLAINOUS VEXILLOLOGY #9/11 #Gaza #False Flag #Hamas

July 25

Weekends with Jason Olbourne, on TNT

July 30

Kim Yeater on Sovereign Radio: 9/11 & COVID-19 PARALLELS WITH RICHARD GAGE

August:

August 4

Robert Morningstar of the Morningstar Report On Revolution Radio

August 22

Mark Attwood of the Mark Attwood Show

September - Another 9/11 Anniversary

Richard's insights were in high demand as the world marked another anniversary of the tragic events. He participated in 92 interviews during this period, reaching millions globally. Notable appearances included discussions with Luke Rudkowski and Donald Jeffries, where they delved deep into the intricacies of the 9/11 events and the quest for transparency. ​

September 4

RB Ham of Beyond the Pale: Richard Gage goes Beyond The Pale

September 5

Kristi Leigh of Get Free interviews Richard Gage: 9/11, One Of Many Inside Jobs

September 10

Pastor Jonathan Shelley and Ben the Baptist of The Baptist Bias: Was 9/11 an Inside Job? | Guest: Richard Gage

Alexis Cossette-Trudel of Radio-Québec: L’entrevue de Richard GAGE - Les attentats du 11 Septembre 2001

77k views

The Alpha Warrior Show with Alfredo “Alpha” Luna: 9/11 SPECIAL EVENT - 24 HOUR BROADCAST - DAVE VONKLEIST & RICHARD GAGE (RG911 starts around 4:25)

The Nancy Kerner Show Interviews RichardGage911: “From Crime Scene to Courtroom,” Uncovering the Painful Truth with Special Guest Richard Gage

Luke Rudkowski, founder of We Are Change: Live W/ Mark Dice, Debate Breakdown And Architect's New Revelations (Richard starts at 1:13)

Sulaiman Ahmed on X (Twitter): THE TRUTH ABOUT 9/11 w/ @RyLiberty @RichardGage_911 @danhanley & MORE (audio, RG911 starts at minute 58)

September 12

Un Ciudadano Cualquiera (“A Common Citizen, “ based in Spain) interviewed Richard with 2-way translation: UN CIUDADANO CUALQUIERA #588 (from minute 12 to 1:03) followed by a discussion of 9/11’s utmost importance to Europeans

September 20

The Warren Thornton Show: 9/11 EXPLOSIVE EVIDENCE WITH RICHARD GAGE & WARREN THORNTON

September 21

Catherine Watters of The Family Industrial Complex aired an interview recorded on September 12: RICHARD GAGE of 911C2C.org & RichardGage911.org

September 27

Donald Jeffries : Don Jeffries talks 9/11 with Richard Gage

October

October 6

Michael Welch interviews RichardGage911 on Global Research: October 7, Anniversary of Two Wars based on False Flags, U.S.’s 9/11 and Israel’s 10/7 (transcript)

October 7

Catherine Watters of The Family Industrial Complex: RICHARD GAGE - Parallels between 9/11 and GENOCIDE IN GAZA

October 13

Ahmed Elkholy of Geneva Academy Language Center hosted Richard over two shows:

Part 1 — Building 7:

October 15

Part 2 — The Twin Towers:

October 15

Dr. Rima Laibow of Catalytic Conversations

October 28

October 30 - 1.4k views

Evan McDermod of The Fifth Dimension Podcast

November:

November 4

November 7

Donna Brandenburg of Brandenburg News Network - Program 1 of 4

November 13

Dave Krieger from The Krieger Files interviews RichardGage911 (audio)

November 14

Donna Brandenburg of Brandenburg News Network - Program 2 of 4

November 21

Donna Brandenburg of Brandenburg News Network - Program 3 of 4

November 24

Scott Armstrong with Rebunked News Network: 9/11 Crime Scene To Courtroom | Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

November 22 - 2k views

The Monica Perez Show interviews RichardGage911

December:

December 5

Donna Brandenburg of Brandenburg News Network - Program 4 of 4

December 11

Highway Diary with Eric Hollerbach interviews RichardGage911 (audio)

Breakfast with Vinnie interviews RichardGage911: The Richard Gage 9/11 Presentation, Part One

December 12

Stephen Harris & Chris Burke of Faith & Liberty Podcast: 9/11 Truth w/ Richard Gage AIA (Richard starts at 1 hour 8 minutes)

December 18 - 2.1k views

Wake Up with Sonia Poulton interviews RichardGage911: Wake Up Special: Lucy Letby, 9/11, Geoengineering, Manchester Arena Attack + Intel Lady (Richard starts at 1 hour 45)

December 26

Ginni and Kelly Powers of The Night Hawk on KSCO Santa Cruz Feature Richard Gage - WTC 1, 2, & 7 (audio)

83 Interviews Total!

We were delighted to keep Richard so busy with these 2024 interviews because we reached tens of millions of people with the explosive truth about the destruction of these three skyscrapers. We believe that we had even more interviews in 2025. Stand by for that review next! And we need you to continue to support us in 2026! We will do our part speaking on behalf of you, in the 9/11 Truth Movement who care so much about exposing this evil. Will you do your part to support us?

I Will Support the RG911 Interviews!

Our extensive interviews and podcasts have played a pivotal role in educating the public and fostering millions of informed discussions on the critical topic of 9/11.

We have been led to numerous new platforms and have engage with diverse audiences worldwide. These interviews not only challenged prevailing narratives but also fostered critical discussions across various communities that we couldn’t have reached — without your critical support. Thank you! RichardGage911 is honored to be able to speak out for the last 20 years, and, if necessary the next 20!

Join us!

Be on the Winning 9/11 Truth Team!

​

In Episode 5, we examine NIST's denial of explosions and witnesses of explosions at World Trade Center Building 7, and watch directly the testimony of exactly such witnesses. We'll see the evidence of explosions in the behavior of the building, the resulting pyroclastic-like clouds, and the seismic signals from a nearby seismology station 10 seconds before the building drops like a rock.

Experts & Eyewitnesses for Episode 5 include: Mark Lillie, Explosives Engineer; Andre Rousseau, Geophysics/Seismology expert; Erik Lawyer, Seattle Fire Dept., Ret., founder of Firefighters for 9/11 Truth; David Chandler, Physics Instructor, founder of 911SpeakOut; and Capt. Richard Patterson, FDNY, 9/11 First Responder.

Watch the Episode 5 Trailer Now:

Visit the 911C2C Website!

9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom brings alive the 60 exhibits of the 9/11 WTC Evidence that have already been submitted to the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Mick Harrison, Public Interest Attorney affiliated with the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, and I were filmed in a Washington, DC board room with our stand-in Grand Jurors. We’ve assembled more than 2 dozen technical experts in their fields, along with the 9/11 first responders — eyewitnesses to the explosive evidence.

Co-Produce the 911C2C Film Series!

Watch the Episode 5 Premiere Broadcast with the Lawyers’ Committee Panel — Introduction and Q&A

Join Richard and Gail Gage of RichardGage911, along with Lawyers’ Committee Board Chair Barbara Honegger, Board Member Charlotte Dennet, Esq., and Public Interest Attorney Mick Harrison as we introduce the Premiere of Episode 5 of 9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom to more than 1,000 LIVE viewers on December 28, 2025, and take on some fascinating questions following the Premiere!

Episode 1: Introduction to the Public

• We oriented the public to the upcoming series, “Taking Hard Evidence of the 9/11 Crimes to Court. We gave you insight into the mission of Mick Harrison and me and our respective organizations — The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry and RichardGage911. We also let everybody know how you can get involved as a virtual Grand Juror, evaluating the evidence and providing feedback as the series progresses.

Episode 2: Grand Jury Meets Fires of WTC 7 & Deception of NIST

• Attorney Mick Harrison and Architect Richard Gage, AIA, introduce the mission of the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Truth and RichardGage911 to the Grand Jurors, along with the evidence of the few, small, and scattered fires at Building 7 that are claimed by NIST to have brought it down.

• We destroy the NIST theory — with the help of our panel of experts for this episode: Firefighter Captain Raul Angulo and Firefighter Erik Lawyer from Seattle FD; fmr. Fire Chief & Commissioner Chris Gioia from Franklin Square in NY; High-rise Architect David Mack; and Fire Protection Engineer Brendan Murphy.

Episode 3: Grand Jury Confronts the Sudden, Symmetrical, Free-Fall of WTC 7

• We, Attorney Mick Harrison and Architect Richard Gage, AIA, introduce the signature features of Controlled Demolition to the Grand Jurors, along with the WTC 7 evidence that matches those features.

• Our expert witnesses demolish NIST’s theory of collapse — normal office fires. They include Structural Engineers Kamal Obeid and Steve Dusterwald; High-rise Architect Richard Wallace; Architectural Engineer Ross Muir; Veteran Physics Teacher David Chandler; and Professional Explosives Loader Tom Sullivan.

Episode 4: NIST’s Collapse Initiation Theory and Computer Modeling — a Potemkin Village

• We examine NIST’s flawed World Trade Center Building 7 collapse initiation theory and explore the numerous problems with their computer modeling of this building’s collapse.

• We expose each of the manipulations — from the exaggerated fires that they claimed induced the thermal expansion of long-span beams pushing a girder off of its seat on column 12, causing floor 13 to fall on 12 and so on for 9 floors, in what they claim is a progressive collapse that then moved from one end of the building to the other in 5 seconds, gutting the interior of the building before the exterior falls in free-fall acceleration.

• We then reveal the 4-year structural re-evaluation of the WTC 7 collapse by one of the top forensic structural engineers in the country, Prof. Leroy Hulsey at the University of Alaska. This dynamic element analysis concluded that fire couldn’t have brought Building 7 down at all, much less suddenly, symmetrically, at free-fall acceleration into its own footprint in under 7 seconds. All of the columns in the building had to have been removed all at once — starting at the lower floors — which is what is done in a controlled demolition.

• Our experts for this episode include: Prof. Leroy Hulsey, SE, Structural Engineer; Roland Angle, PE, Civil/Structural Engineer; Kamal Obeid, SE, Structural Engineer; Scott Grainger, FPE, Fire Protection Engineer; and Tony Szamboti, ME, Mechanical Engineer.

We plan on submitting these powerful evidence-based episodes to the actual Grand Jurors via a federal judge, along with the Grand Jury Petition mentioned earlier, and will format the total of 12 C2C episodes specifically for them.

Don’t miss any of the 9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom episodes! Share them with like-minded friends, and skeptics as well! We must wake up the public in order to ensure our victory in the judicial system via the Grand Jury, and the legislative branch via Sen. Ron Johnson’s promised Senate Hearings on 9/11.

Please do your part today:

Be a Part of 9/11: C2C !!

Watch the LIVE Broadcast!

• on StreamYard Webinar

• on X

• at 911C2C.org

• at The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry

• at RichardGage911

• and… Get an Email Reminder!

In Episode 5, we examine NIST's denial of explosions and witnesses of explosions at World Trade Center Building 7, and watch directly the testimony of exactly such witnesses. We'll see the evidence of explosions in the behavior of the building, the resulting pyroclastic-like clouds, and the seismic signals from a nearby seismology station 10 seconds before the building drops like a rock.

Experts & Eyewitnesses for Episode 5 include: Mark Lillie, Explosives Engineer; Andre Rousseau, Geophysics/Seismology expert; Erik Lawyer, Seattle Fire Dept., Ret., founder of Firefighters for 9/11 Truth; David Chandler, Physics Instructor; and Capt. Richard Patterson, FDNY, 9/11 First Responder.

Watch the Episode 5 Trailer Now:

Visit the 911C2C Website!

9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom brings alive the 60 exhibits of the 9/11 WTC Evidence that have already been submitted to the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Mick Harrison, Public Interest Attorney affiliated with the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, and I were filmed in a Washington, DC board room with our stand-in Grand Jurors. We’ve assembled more than 2 dozen technical experts in their fields, along with the 9/11 first responders — eyewitnesses to the explosive evidence.

Co-Produce the 911C2C Film Series!

Episode 1: Introduction to the Public

• We oriented the public to the upcoming series, “Taking Hard Evidence of the 9/11 Crimes to Court. We gave you insight into the mission of Mick Harrison and me and our respective organizations — The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry and RichardGage911. We also let everybody know how you can get involved as a virtual Grand Juror, evaluating the evidence and providing feedback as the series progresses.

Episode 2: Grand Jury Meets Fires of WTC 7 & Deception of NIST

• Attorney Mick Harrison and Architect Richard Gage, AIA, introduce the mission of the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Truth and RichardGage911 to the Grand Jurors, along with the evidence of the few, small, and scattered fires at Building 7 that are claimed by NIST to have brought it down.

• We destroy the NIST theory — with the help of our panel of experts for this episode: Firefighter Captain Raul Angulo and Firefighter Erik Lawyer from Seattle FD; fmr. Fire Chief & Commissioner Chris Gioia from Franklin Square in NY; High-rise Architect David Mack; and Fire Protection Engineer Brendan Murphy.

Episode 3: Grand Jury Confronts the Sudden, Symmetrical, Free-Fall of WTC 7

• We, Attorney Mick Harrison and Architect Richard Gage, AIA, introduce the signature features of Controlled Demolition to the Grand Jurors, along with the WTC 7 evidence that matches those features.

• Our expert witnesses demolish NIST’s theory of collapse — normal office fires. They include Structural Engineers Kamal Obeid and Steve Dusterwald; High-rise Architect Richard Wallace; Architectural Engineer Ross Muir; Veteran Physics Teacher David Chandler; and Professional Explosives Loader Tom Sullivan.

Episode 4: NIST’s Collapse Initiation Theory and Computer Modeling — a Potemkin Village

• We examine NIST’s flawed World Trade Center Building 7 collapse initiation theory and explore the numerous problems with their computer modeling of this building’s collapse.

• We expose each of the manipulations — from the exaggerated fires that they claimed induced the thermal expansion of long-span beams pushing a girder off of its seat on column 12, causing floor 13 to fall on 12 and so on for 9 floors, in what they claim is a progressive collapse that then moved from one end of the building to the other in 5 seconds, gutting the interior of the building before the exterior falls in free-fall acceleration.

• We then reveal the 4-year structural re-evaluation of the WTC 7 collapse by one of the top forensic structural engineers in the country, Prof. Leroy Hulsey at the University of Alaska. This dynamic element analysis concluded that fire couldn’t have brought Building 7 down at all, much less suddenly, symmetrically, at free-fall acceleration into its own footprint in under 7 seconds. All of the columns in the building had to have been removed all at once — starting at the lower floors — which is what is done in a controlled demolition.

• Our experts for this episode include: Prof. Leroy Hulsey, SE, Structural Engineer; Roland Angle, PE, Civil/Structural Engineer; Kamal Obeid, SE, Structural Engineer; Scott Grainger, FPE, Fire Protection Engineer; and Tony Szamboti, ME, Mechanical Engineer.

We plan on submitting these powerful evidence-based episodes to the actual Grand Jurors via a federal judge, along with the Grand Jury Petition mentioned earlier, and will format the total of 12 C2C episodes specifically for them.

Don’t miss any of the 9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom episodes! Share them with like-minded friends, and skeptics as well! We must wake up the public in order to ensure our victory in the judicial system via the Grand Jury, and the legislative branch via Sen. Ron Johnson’s promised Senate Hearings on 9/11. Please do your part today:

Be a Part of 9/11: C2C !!

We’ll see you at the Premier of 9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom on Sunday, December 28 at 5 pm Pacific / 8 pm Eastern!

Watch the LIVE Broadcast!

• on StreamYard Webinar

• on X

• at 911C2C.org

• at The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry

• at RichardGage911

• and… Get an Email Reminder!

In Episode 5, we examine NIST's denial of explosions and witnesses of explosions at World Trade Center Building 7, and watch directly the testimony of exactly such witnesses. We'll see the evidence of explosions in the behavior of the building, the resulting pyroclastic-like clouds, and the seismic signals from a nearby seismology station 10 seconds before the building drops like a rock.

Experts & Eyewitnesses for Episode 5 include: Mark Lillie, Explosives Engineer; Andre Rousseau, Geophysics/Seismology expert; Erik Lawyer, Seattle Fire Dept., Ret., founder of Firefighters for 9/11 Truth; David Chandler, Physics Instructor; and Capt. Richard Patterson, FDNY, 9/11 First Responder.

Watch the Episode 5 Trailer Now:

Visit the 911C2C Website!

9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom brings alive the 60 exhibits of the 9/11 WTC Evidence that have already been submitted to the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Mick Harrison, Public Interest Attorney affiliated with the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, and I were filmed in a Washington, DC board room with our stand-in Grand Jurors. We’ve assembled more than 2 dozen technical experts in their fields, along with the 9/11 first responders — eyewitnesses to the explosive evidence.

Co-Produce the 911C2C Film Series!

Episode 1: Introduction to the Public

• We oriented the public to the upcoming series, “Taking Hard Evidence of the 9/11 Crimes to Court. We gave you insight into the mission of Mick Harrison and me and our respective organizations — The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry and RichardGage911. We also let everybody know how you can get involved as a virtual Grand Juror, evaluating the evidence and providing feedback as the series progresses.

Episode 2: Grand Jury Meets Fires of WTC 7 & Deception of NIST

• Attorney Mick Harrison and Architect Richard Gage, AIA, introduce the mission of the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Truth and RichardGage911 to the Grand Jurors, along with the evidence of the few, small, and scattered fires at Building 7 that are claimed by NIST to have brought it down.

• We destroy the NIST theory — with the help of our panel of experts for this episode: Firefighter Captain Raul Angulo and Firefighter Erik Lawyer from Seattle FD; fmr. Fire Chief & Commissioner Chris Gioia from Franklin Square in NY; High-rise Architect David Mack; and Fire Protection Engineer Brendan Murphy.

Episode 3: Grand Jury Confronts the Sudden, Symmetrical, Free-Fall of WTC 7

• We, Attorney Mick Harrison and Architect Richard Gage, AIA, introduce the signature features of Controlled Demolition to the Grand Jurors, along with the WTC 7 evidence that matches those features.

• Our expert witnesses demolish NIST’s theory of collapse — normal office fires. They include Structural Engineers Kamal Obeid and Steve Dusterwald; High-rise Architect Richard Wallace; Architectural Engineer Ross Muir; Veteran Physics Teacher David Chandler; and Professional Explosives Loader Tom Sullivan.

Episode 4: NIST’s Collapse Initiation Theory and Computer Modeling — a Potemkin Village

• We examine NIST’s flawed World Trade Center Building 7 collapse initiation theory and explore the numerous problems with their computer modeling of this building’s collapse.

• We expose each of the manipulations — from the exaggerated fires that they claimed induced the thermal expansion of long-span beams pushing a girder off of its seat on column 12, causing floor 13 to fall on 12 and so on for 9 floors, in what they claim is a progressive collapse that then moved from one end of the building to the other in 5 seconds, gutting the interior of the building before the exterior falls in free-fall acceleration.

• We then reveal the 4-year structural re-evaluation of the WTC 7 collapse by one of the top forensic structural engineers in the country, Prof. Leroy Hulsey at the University of Alaska. This dynamic element analysis concluded that fire couldn’t have brought Building 7 down at all, much less suddenly, symmetrically, at free-fall acceleration into its own footprint in under 7 seconds. All of the columns in the building had to have been removed all at once — starting at the lower floors — which is what is done in a controlled demolition.

• Our experts for this episode include: Prof. Leroy Hulsey, SE, Structural Engineer; Roland Angle, PE, Civil/Structural Engineer; Kamal Obeid, SE, Structural Engineer; Scott Grainger, FPE, Fire Protection Engineer; and Tony Szamboti, ME, Mechanical Engineer.

We plan on submitting these powerful evidence-based episodes to the actual Grand Jurors via a federal judge, along with the Grand Jury Petition mentioned earlier, and will format the total of 12 C2C episodes specifically for them.

Don’t miss any of the 9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom episodes! Share them with like-minded friends, and skeptics as well! We must wake up the public in order to ensure our victory in the judicial system via the Grand Jury, and the legislative branch via Sen. Ron Johnson’s promised Senate Hearings on 9/11. Please do your part today:

Be a Part of 9/11: C2C !!

We’ll see you at the Premier of 9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom on Sunday, December 28 at 5 pm Pacific / 8 pm Eastern!

So, during this Christmas season, and in that spirit of truth, we hope that each of you has an even more awakened New Year filled with an abundance of love, joy, and peace.

In the spirit of gratefulness, and looking at all we have to be thankful for, we want to thank each one of our selfless and generous supporters… Because without your help, we wouldn’t be able to focus our time and attention on extending the reach of 9/11 truth to the extent that we have—with more interviews than ever in 2025, and thanks to our interviews with Bret Weinstein, Clayton Morris of Redacted, and Jimmy Dore, we have finally had a breakthrough into more quasi-mainstream podcasts!

There is a good deal of greatness coming up in 2026 for the 9/11 Truth Movement! Sen. Ron Johnson, who is Chair of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, has offered us in the 9/11 Truth Movement an unexpected yet amazing opportunity to author a PSI report on the irrefutable evidence of controlled demolition at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. This is the first time that 9/11 truth activists and organizations have come close to a real investigation into the catastrophic events of that day.

You can join our efforts by sharing our interviews in Podcasts and Speaking Engagements and articles with people around you. That deserve to know the truth about 911. Keep the greatness coming!

Again, our warmest, Christmas greetings to you personally—and our most sincere wishes for a happy, and successful New Year!

Sincerely,

Gail and Richard

Support 9/11 Truth Greatness!

Before the lecture, 9/11 family member Matt Campbell joined Ted Walter to discuss the latest breakthrough in his family’s effort to secure a new inquest into the death of his brother Geoff, and Dr. Madhava Setty gave introductory remarks.

Following the lecture, Dr. Setty facilitated an insightful roundtable discussion with Ellefritz and some of the most powerful voices in the 9/11 Truth movement today: Jason Bermas, James Corbett, and Sandra Laratonda.

Below is a video of the event divided into sections. Under the lecture and roundtable sections, we have provided detailed synopses to help viewers navigate and absorb the complex material and discussion topics. There are also links to various supporting materials related to Ellefritz’s lecture.

Opening Remarks

Ted Walter | 16 minutes

A 9/11 Family Goes to the UK Supreme Court

Ted Walter and Matt Campbell | 14 minutes

David Ray Griffin and 9/11 Truth Today

Madhava Setty, MD | 15 minutes

9/11 Truth Today: A Social Movement at the Precipice

Professor Richard G. Ellefritz | 1 hour 8 minutes

Speaker Bio

Richard G. Ellefritz is an assistant professor of sociology at the University of The Bahamas. He earned his Ph.D. in sociology at Oklahoma State University after successfully defending his dissertation on how the conspiracy label is used to avoid offering direct and rigorous rebuttals to empirical claims made by so-called conspiracy theorists. His research interests range from conspiracy discourse to pedagogical techniques, and his main occupational focus is on teaching a variety of courses in the social and behavioral sciences.

Resources

• PowerPoint

• References and Annotated Bibliographies

• 9/11 Truth Playlist

Abstract

Professor Richard G. Ellefritz’s lecture advances an epistemological critique of how challenges to official accounts of September 11, 2001, are delegitimized within contemporary public and academic discourse. Drawing on conflict sociology, stigma theory, and social-movement analysis, Ellefritz argues that the label “conspiracy theory” functions less as an evaluative category than as a boundary-maintenance mechanism that preempts empirical engagement. He contends that the 9/11 Truth Movement has been systematically mischaracterized as epistemically deficient, despite its ongoing empirical research, methodological pluralism, and engagement with institutional actors. By contrast, Ellefritz suggests that many anti-conspiricist frameworks rely on psychological pathologization and rhetorical dismissal rather than sustained evidentiary analysis. The lecture reframes 9/11 Truth as a legitimate, empirically grounded social movement and contributes to a growing body of scholarship that challenges prevailing assumptions about rationality, dissent, and knowledge production in politically sensitive contexts.

Support the 9/11 Truth Movement!

Section-by-Section Synopsis

1. Conflict Sociology and the Question of Power

Ellefritz opens by situating his analysis within conflict sociology, drawing on the early-twentieth-century work of Georg Simmel and Max Weber. From Simmel he takes the central analytical question “cui bono”—Latin for “who benefits”—and applies it to conflict, secrecy, and elite interaction. From Weber he draws a theory of social stratification, in which status groups maintain privilege through authority, honor, and institutional position.

A key concept here is social closure: elites create boundaries that separate insiders from outsiders, with outsiders typically serving or working for those in power. This framework establishes how authority and legitimacy are preserved and why challenges to dominant narratives are often treated as threats rather than contributions to knowledge.

2. The State, Crisis, and the Utility of Problems

Ellefritz then turns to the sociological definition of the state as the entity that monopolizes the legitimate use of force. He argues that crises are not merely endured by such institutions but are often organizationally useful, because problems justify solutions—and institutions that control solutions benefit from the persistence of problems.

Within this framework, the wars of aggression launched after 9/11 become a central concern of the 9/11 Truth Movement, whose call for investigation is framed not as abstract skepticism but as an effort to address questions of war, peace, justice, and truth that remain unresolved decades later.

3. Ideological Power and Structural Power

Ellefritz distinguishes between two broad sociological approaches to power. One focuses on ideology, drawing on Steven Lukes’s argument that the most effective form of power is preventing certain issues from arising at all by shaping discourse and perception. Media, education, and other ideological institutions play a central role here.

The second approach focuses on power structures, drawing on the work of C. Wright Mills, G. William Domhoff, and Peter Phillips, and includes analysis of elite networks and institutional interlocks. Ellefritz notes that concepts such as the “deep state,” often dismissed today as right-wing rhetoric, actually originated in left-wing critical scholarship (notably Peter Dale Scott), illustrating how ideological framing itself serves elite interests.

4. Framing, Recruitment, and Political Insiders

At a more micro-sociological level, Ellefritz examines framing processes and the importance of recruiting institutional insiders. He highlights figures such as Senator Ron Johnson, whose call for new Senate hearings on 9/11 represents a potential institutional mechanism for reopening investigation, and former Congressman Dennis Kucinich, whose engagement with 9/11 Truth goes beyond symbolic endorsement.

Media framing, however, often neutralizes these developments through selective representation and stigmatizing labels, reinforcing boundaries between legitimate and illegitimate discourse rather than engaging the substance of the claims.

5. Stigma, Labeling, and Moral Panic

Drawing on Erving Goffman’s work on stigma and Howard Becker’s labeling theory, Ellefritz explains how the label “conspiracy theorist” functions to spoil identity and disqualify individuals as reasonable interlocutors. This process creates insiders and outsiders of permissible discourse and parallels earlier sociological analyses of moral panics and symbolic crusades.

Rather than addressing evidence, the label “conspiracy theorist” itself performs the work of exclusion. Ellefritz emphasizes that this stigmatization is not accidental but a routine feature of how controversial claims are managed in modern societies.

6. Media, Propaganda, and Cascading Narratives

Ellefritz situates 9/11 within established media-studies frameworks, including Herman and Chomsky’s propaganda model and Robert Entman’s cascading activation model. Official narratives originate with state actors, cascade through mainstream media, and become normalized in public consciousness.

Fear-based messaging—such as color-coded terror alerts—played a key role in reinforcing these official narratives. Within this context, Ellefritz characterizes the 9/11 Commission Report as a text that can be analyzed sociologically as a propaganda artifact rather than a neutral investigation.

7. Authority, Debunking, and Popular Mechanics

Using media examples such as Popular Mechanics and televised appeals to institutional authority, Ellefritz examines how debunking often substitutes credentials and tone for substantive engagement. He notes that successive editions of Debunking 9/11 Myths failed to address direct rebuttals, including David Ray Griffin’s later responses, while continuing to recycle earlier claims.

Here, Ellefritz implicitly advances an important analytical point: although the 9/11 Truth Movement is often accused of operating outside empirical standards, it is anti-conspiricist efforts such as Popular Mechanics that more closely resemble a degenerating research program—avoiding anomalies, declining to engage counter-evidence, and relying increasingly on rhetorical dismissal rather than explanatory development.

8. Network Power and Interlocking Directorates

Ellefritz introduces network analysis to show how media institutions are embedded within broader corporate and defense-industry structures through interlocking directorates. He stresses that this form of analysis is standard sociological practice yet is frequently dismissed as conspiratorial when applied to sensitive political topics, reinforcing the very stigmatization he has been describing.

9. Pathologization, Anti-Conspiricism, and Epistemology

A major portion of the lecture critiques psychological and social-scientific approaches that pathologize belief in conspiracy theories. Ellefritz explicitly aligns his analysis with Lee Basham and Matthew R. X. Dentith, referencing Basham and Dentith’s co-authored article “Social Science’s Conspiracy Theory Panic” and Dentith’s book Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously.

These works challenge the tendency to presume irrationality in advance of investigation and to rely on survey correlations, belief clustering, and stigmatizing concepts such as dysrationalia, crippled epistemologies, or degenerating research paradigms without engaging primary evidence.

Ellefritz makes clear—sometimes explicitly, sometimes implicitly—that the charge of being “not empirically grounded,” so often leveled against the 9/11 Truth Movement, more accurately describes anti-conspiricist scholarship itself, which frequently avoids empirical engagement in favor of psychological dismissal.

10. State Crime, Delegitimation, and deHaven-Smith

Ellefritz’s analysis converges with Lance deHaven-Smith’s concept of State Crimes Against Democracy, which emphasizes how large-scale abuses of power are obscured through institutional denial and delegitimation rather than lack of evidence. Within this framework, stigma and ridicule function as tools that protect official narratives from scrutiny.

Together, Basham, Dentith, deHaven-Smith, and Ellefritz articulate a shared epistemological position: The conspiracy label operates as a mechanism for avoiding empirical confrontation, not resolving it.

11. The 9/11 Truth Movement as Ongoing Research and Activism

Ellefritz characterizes the 9/11 Truth Movement as empirically engaged and methodologically diverse, citing ongoing work on seismology, structural analysis, and the free-fall collapse of World Trade Center 7. Drawing on Laura Jones, he situates the movement within the sociology of social movements and emphasizes its redefinition of patriotism as a constitutional obligation to question power.

Concepts such as “conspiratorial imaginaries” are clarified as cultural frameworks that sustain collective action, not indicators of irrationality.

12. Conclusion

Ellefritz concludes that the 9/11 Truth Movement remains a multifaceted, evolving effort to challenge dominant definitions of reality. Far from being empirically vacuous or socially deviant, it exhibits the features of a progressive research program, continually engaging new evidence and recruiting institutional allies despite persistent stigma.

The lecture ultimately reframes the debate: the central issue is not whether conspiracy theories are dangerous, but whether power can be questioned without dissent being pathologized.

Roundtable Discussion

Professor Richard G. Ellefritz, Jason Bermas, James Corbett, Sandra Laratonda, and Madhava Setty, MD | 1 hour 11 minutes

Discussion Topics

1. Teaching Critical Thinking Rather Than Prescribing Conclusions

Richard G. Ellefritz explains that his pedagogical focus is on teaching students how to think critically about power and authority rather than teaching specific conclusions about 9/11. Madhava Setty reinforces this framing by stressing the broader educational importance of cultivating discernment rather than indoctrination.

2. Straw-Man Debunking and Guilt by Association

Jason Bermas describes how 9/11 Truth is routinely discredited by being associated with fringe beliefs such as Flat Earth or QAnon, allowing critics to dismiss serious evidence without engaging it.

3. Hijacker Anomalies and Ignored Early Reporting

Jason Bermas outlines early mainstream reports indicating alleged hijackers’ ties to U.S. military bases, intelligence-linked individuals, and FBI informants that later vanished from public discussion.

4. The Mechanics of Straw-Man ‘Debunks’

Jason Bermas explains how debunking outlets rely on claims of “retractions” without demonstrating how the original reporting was disproven, thereby avoiding engagement with the broader evidentiary record.

5. Public Awareness as a Precondition for Institutional Action

Jason Bermas recounts Senator Ron Johnson’s view that evidence must gain public traction before official investigations or hearings become politically viable.

6. The Long Absence of Executive Accountability

Jason Bermas situates 9/11 within a broader historical pattern of impunity, noting the lack of meaningful accountability since Iran-Contra.

7. Internal Skepticism and Self-Correction Within the Movement

James Corbett challenges the stereotype that the 9/11 Truth Movement lacks internal critique, explaining that serious researchers regularly revise or abandon claims when confronted with better evidence.

8. Cognitive Dissonance and Psychological Resistance

James Corbett discusses the emotional difficulty many people experience when confronting evidence that threatens their worldview. Madhava Setty adds that such resistance is a common human response to existential threat, not a sign of intellectual deficiency.

9. Sociological Perspectives on Resistance to Evidence

Richard G. Ellefritz supplements the psychological discussion by describing interviews with activists who initially rejected 9/11 Truth but found certain evidence—especially regarding World Trade Center 7—impossible to dismiss.

10. Algorithmic Suppression and Platform Gatekeeping

Jason Bermas provides firsthand examples of age restrictions, warning labels, and algorithmic suppression applied to 9/11-related content on platforms such as YouTube.

11. Partial Openings and Persistent Failures in Alternative Media

Jason Bermas critiques alternative-media figures who reopen discussion of 9/11 while repeating serious errors or omitting crucial context.

12. Unexamined Documentary and Legal Evidence

Jason Bermas highlights extensive court records, intelligence documents, and civil-litigation material that remain largely unexamined by both mainstream media and academia.

13. The 1993 World Trade Center Bombing as Precedent

Jason Bermas draws parallels between the 1993 bombing and 9/11, particularly regarding FBI informant involvement and institutional misconduct.

14. Prospects and Limits of New Senate Hearings

Richard G. Ellefritz questions whether any credible experts could publicly defend NIST’s explanation of WTC 7, while Jason Bermas emphasizes that hearings would primarily establish a public record rather than deliver immediate prosecutions.

15. Is the Movement at an Inflection Point?

James Corbett argues that structural resistance has remained largely constant, with recent changes driven more by shifts in the media environment than by institutional reform.

16. Evolution of the 9/11 Truth Movement Over Time

Sandra Laratonda traces the movement’s progression from early street activism to credentialed organizations such as Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, followed by fragmentation and maturation.

17. Grassroots Organizing Versus Information Saturation

Sandra Laratonda emphasizes that while information is widely available, motivating people to take sustained action remains a central challenge.

18. Internal Dynamics, Gatekeeping, and Fragmentation

Sandra Laratonda and James Corbett discuss factionalism, accusations of gatekeeping, and the difficulty newcomers face navigating competing theories and organizational divisions.

19. Evidence-First Engagement Versus Broader Worldview Framing

Richard G. Ellefritz argues for prioritizing concrete physical evidence—particularly WTC 7—when engaging newcomers, warning that broader geopolitical implications can overwhelm audiences if introduced too early.

20. Fragmentation and Public Confusion

Sandra Laratonda explains how the proliferation of theories and organizations can make it harder for newcomers to distinguish strong evidence from speculation.

21. Distribution as the Central Bottleneck

Jason Bermas maintains that distribution, not discovery, has long been the primary obstacle to wider public understanding.

22. Post-COVID Shifts in Public Skepticism

Jason Bermas notes that COVID-era government and media behavior has increased public openness to questioning official narratives.

23. Defining “Victory” for 9/11 Truth

James Corbett frames success in terms of historical recognition and preventing future wars, while Sandra Laratonda emphasizes cultural and educational impact.

24. Internal Discord as the Greatest Obstacle

James Corbett warns that internal conflict could undermine genuine breakthroughs, including hearings or high-profile films.

25. Objective Evidence Versus Relativism

Jason Bermas forcefully distinguishes physical evidence—such as free-fall collapse and molten metal—from subjective interpretation, rejecting relativism in matters of science.

26. Psychological Courage and Democratic Responsibility

Richard G. Ellefritz closes by emphasizing the courage required to confront institutional deception and frames this as a civic responsibility necessary to prevent future harm.

Support the 9/11 Truth Movement!

We have the classics like my personal favorite, 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out. Richard made this documentary, which is rich in the hard evidence and eyewitness testimony of explosives and incendiaries at all three high-rises at the World Trade Center, and includes testimony from 40 technical experts in their fields! and it’s been a cornerstone of public outreach in the 9/11 Truth Movement.

We also have newer releases, such as “SEVEN,” a short documentary by director Dylan Avery narrated by actor Ed Asner, which tells the story of the engineering team analysing World Trade Center Building 7, including Dr. Leroy Hulsey and his Ph.D. students at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

Calling Out Bravo 7 is the popular documentary film created by firefighters, for firefighters, that examines in detail the collapse of WTC Building 7 and exposes the official lies from many quarters. It is presented in honor of, and for justice for, the 343 firefighters who lost their lives on September 11, 2001. Recently, former Congressman and past fire chief Curt Weldon promoted firefighters and this film during his string of power-packed interviews with more mainstream investigative journalists such as Tucker Carlson and Jimmy Dore.

Also, The Unspeakable is on sale! Their loved ones were murdered on 9/11. Twenty years later, they are still fighting for the truth. The Unspeakable is a deeply felt 9/11 truth-awakening film directed, again, by Dylan Avery and produced by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. The film follows four families in their ongoing struggle to find the truth about the murder of their loved ones on September 11, 2001. Interwoven with their stories are the elucidating words of psychologist Robert Griffin, who guides the audience through an exploration of trauma and the healing power of bringing suppressed truths to light. The film also includes interviews with engineer Tony Szamboti and world-renowned forensic pathologist Cyril Wecht.

We have many more DVDs to choose from! We also have other great 9/11 Truth-promoting products to check out, such as t-shirts, hats, and more. Be sure to visit the RG911 Store, and remember that every purchase is a donation that helps Richard and me continue our very important mission of waking up humanity to 9/11 Truth.

I'll Support the 9/11 Truth Mission!

The ultimate fight for 9/11 truth and justice has just reached a historic juncture.

But right now, the case cannot proceed unless Matt raises £7,855 ($10,400) by Wednesday, December 3. This is the required court fee associated with filing his Notice of Intention to Proceed.

Without these funds, the appeal will be halted before it even begins. Will you help Matt take these necessary steps to win his Supreme Court today?

Please Donate Now!

Don’t Wait — Give Today

Please visit Matt’s Crowdfunder page today and give whatever you can:

https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/p/geoff-campbell-supreme-court-case

Every contribution — no matter the amount — brings Matt and his family one step closer to ensuring his brother’s case is heard before a panel of Supreme Court justices in the summer of 2026.

The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher

If the appeal succeeds, it will likely lead to Geoff’s inquest being reopened — finally allowing the evidence of controlled demolition to be presented in a court of law and, we hope, resulting in the coroner concluding that Geoff died due to the demolition of the North Tower.

Along the way, Matt’s case is sure to garner international headlines and feed the increasing groundswell of public support for 9/11 truth.

If there were ever a time to donate to the pursuit of 9/11 justice, this is it. Please give what you can before Wednesday to help Matt keep his landmark Supreme Court case alive.

Check out Matt’s speech at the Turning the Tide conference in September for a powerful recounting of his journey over the last several years:

(Yes, we know about Matt’s hairdo. We’ve talked to him. It is part of his rebellion. We’re trying not to judge him. It’s hard, but we’re trying. :)

Support RichardGage911 Too!

This documentary is a summary of the 2011 Toronto Hearings, a 4-day 9/11 conference held in Toronto

In the years following the tragic events of September 11, 2001, questions continued to rise about the official narrative of that day. 9/11: Decade of Deception boldly steps into that conversation, capturing a pivotal moment in history when experts, survivors, and truth advocates gathered to reexamine what really happened.

This powerful documentary chronicles The Toronto Hearings on 9/11, a four-day international conference held at Ryerson University in Toronto, Canada. The event brought together world-class professionals in structural engineering, physics, chemistry, and history, all presenting meticulously researched evidence that challenges the accepted explanations of the attacks:

• David Chandler, Physics Teacher

• Michel Chossudovsky, Global.ca

• Jonathan Cole, Civil Engineer

• Lance DeHaven-Smith, Historian

• Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

• David Ray Griffin, 9/11 Researcher

• Niels Harrit, Chemistry Prov.

• Barbara Honegger, 9/11 Researcher

• Graeme MacQueen, PhD

• Laurie Manwell, Author

• Kevin Ryan, Chemist

• Peter Dale Scott, Author

Among these experts of course was Richard Gage, AIA, founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, who delivers one of the most striking presentations in the film. Through a side-by-side comparison of the World Trade Center collapses and known controlled demolitions, Gage invites viewers to look closely at the evidence — and to decide for themselves whether the “official story” holds up to scientific scrutiny.

The film also features heartfelt interviews with survivors and family members whose lives were forever changed by that day. Their emotional testimonies remind us that this pursuit is not merely academic — it’s deeply human. Their call for a new, independent investigation echoes throughout the film, urging accountability, transparency, and truth.

Directed by Adnan Zuberi, 9/11: Decade of Deception captures the most compelling presentations and exchanges from the Toronto Hearings. The documentary bridges science, compassion, and activism — revealing a movement determined to confront unanswered questions and preserve the principles of honest inquiry.

Beyond the evidence, the film also reflects on how 9/11 reshaped our world — from the Patriot Act and global wars to the steady erosion of civil liberties and privacy. It challenges viewers to consider how these policies were built on a foundation of unresolved truths.

For those who believe that open debate and factual analysis are the lifeblood of democracy, Decade of Deception is essential viewing. It stands as both a historical record and a wake-up call — a reminder that seeking truth is not a conspiracy, but a responsibility.

Experience the film that continues to inspire critical thinking and courageous dialogue around the world.

For the serious “Truthers” in your life, this is a classic that will be treasured as a keepsake and a very significant piece of our dark American history.

Richard and I want to offer you the opportunity to own your own copy at a 35% discount (use coupon code 911DECADE). Visit our RichardGage911 Store and add 9/11: Decades of Deception to your cart this weekend! Also use coupon code 10%OFF for a discount on all of our other DVD’s!

We appreciate your support very much, and our store is a great way for you to help make sure that Richard and I can focus 100% on our work — bringing 9/11 Truth to the world!

Pitch In to Support RichardGage911 !!

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

A New Opportunity

1. Vision Statement:

a. We must bring about a new and unimpeachable 9/11 World Trade Center investigation, fueled by public demand, that results in justice for the 9/11 victims and their family members, as well as the exposure and prosecution of those actually responsible for the attacks.

b. Open the public mind to this all-important issue.

c. Deepen and expand the leadership of AE911Truth to regenerate its activities and image, inside and outside of the 9/11 Truth Movement, by bringing on to the Board of Directors a distinguished group of high-rise architects, structural and fire protection engineers, electrical and mechanical engineers, and explosive experts.

d. Greatly increase the number of 9/11 family members and firefighters calling for a new investigation into the destruction of all three World Trade Center skyscrapers.

2. Strategy:

a. Pursue projects that educate hundreds of millions about the destruction of the three WTC towers destroyed on 9/11 via interviews, speaking engagements, films, conferences, and podcasts.

b. Develop research projects that deepen the level of the WTC evidence for publication.

3. Mission:

a. Our Mission remains unchanged:

“Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth) is a nonprofit organization of architects, engineers, and affiliates dedicated to establishing the truth about the events of September 11, 2001.

We pursue our mission by conducting research and educating the public about the scientific evidence related to the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers and by working with victims’ families and other activists to advocate for a new investigation, and by spotlighting other questions and anomalies about the overall 9/11 official story that we feel are valid, as well as any current events we feel are applicable to 9/11’s impact on society.

At the heart of our work is our deeply held conviction that establishing the truth is essential to achieving justice for the murder of nearly 3,000 people that day. Furthermore, we believe that an honest public accounting of 9/11 is the only way to bring about genuine and lasting change to the system that enabled this atrocity to take place and to the sweeping policies enacted in its aftermath.”

4. Organizational and Structure:

a. The volunteer COO, Gail Gage, and volunteer staff, if any, report to the CEO, Richard Gage. The COO will receive a $500/month stipend.

b. The volunteer CEO, Richard Gage, reports to the Board of Directors and will receive a $1,000/month stipend.

c. The Board of Directors will be predominantly architects and engineers, and will comply with the AE911Truth Non-Profit Corporation Bylaws, and set policy for the organization. The Board meets once per month, and more often when necessary.

5. Immediate Priorities:

a. Upgrade the existing website to the new WordPress format so that authorized volunteers can maintain and post on it.

b. We also must focus on our 3,600 A/E Petition signers again. There’s a lot to accomplish with them, but the first order of business is a major project to rebuild the functionality of the “Sign the Petition” page.

c. Actually, there are many more petition signers now, but that page of the website has been broken for quite some time, and can only be fixed by building a whole new program. And that’s something our volunteer supporters will help us with.

d. Convert the Network-for-Good email operation over to Mail Poet on WordPress – to save $250/month.

e. Convert the Network-for-Good donor collection function over to Donorbox – to save another $250/month.

f. Publish the recent and upcoming interviews and speaking engagements of Richard Gage, AIA, Architect on a frequent basis.

g. Coordinate more closely with activists and their groups in the 9/11 Truth Movement – such as:

i. 9/11 War Room weekly meetings

ii. 9/11 and other Deep State Crimes - monthly conference call

iii. International 9/11 monthly conference call

iv. Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry

h. We will support the effort to complete and distribute the film series 9/11: Crime Scene to Courtroom, in which many of the board members appear as expert witnesses, and which is intended for a Special Grand Jury Investigation.

i. We will support the effort inspired by Sen. Ron Johnson, Chair of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, to document and compile our best evidence of the destruction of the three WTC high-rises on 9/11. This is a monumental task that will create several hundred pages of scientific forensic evidence, eyewitness testimony, and documentary films, which will be coordinated in several volumes along with the work of other researchers hosting irrefutable evidence in the overall 9/11 Truth Movement. This project anticipates a set of Senate Hearings in 2026 which has been offered by the Senator. This could be the single most important set of events of our 20-year AE911Truth history!

6. Future Projects

a. Start a new podcast: “The AE911Truth Podcast! “

b. Create a Computer Model of the WTC Twin Towers, providing visual and mathematical proof of the explosive demolition of the Towers.

c. Publish many unique articles with research, such as “Did Planes Hit the Twin Towers” (dispelling common myths that they didn’t).

d. Host semi-annual educational online conferences with various experts on different topics

e. Sponsor the 9/11 Truth conference on the 25^th Anniversary.

f. Determine feasibility, and participate in, the mega-plan for change at the societal level with Kristen Gasparini –

to use Building 7 as a fulcrum for developing mass public awareness by working with thought leaders who are, or may be, friendly to the truth about 9/11, and who are willing to speak about it and take action.

7. Communication and Outreach

a. Minimum weekly communications to our supporters via email, and posts on all social media sites

i. Communication from our supporters by website, contact form, email, and comments on articles via the website

b. Outreach to the public at major conferences (with our evidence booth), radio interviews, and speaking engagements.

8. Fundraising

a. The CEO and the COO are responsible for meeting the expenses of AE911Truth. Currently, there is an imminent need to raise funds upon our transition to our new leadership. Our big transition announcement concludes by requesting $15K in funds to “support the transition and beef up our infrastructure”. This will also help pay for the current liabilities, including payments to the outgoing Executive Director and webmaster.

b. The new projects mentioned in #5 and #6 above will have fundraising campaigns associated with them. We have learned much from our previous fundraising consultants and will continue to follow the advice provided.

9. Long Term Goals:

a. Our ultimate goal is a real, unimpeachable 9/11 investigation. This won’t happen until the Public is educated en masse.

b. We need more trained 9/11 evidence speakers in order to duplicate our efforts – so we’ll need to re-commit to training them – similar to the recent AE911Truth “Project Due Diligence” program.

c. Educate and bring the 9/11 family members to 9/11 truth awareness, so we must reach out to them.

d. Work closely with Raul Angulo, Erik Lawyer, Chris Gioya, and other firefighters to help increase their ranks and visibility considerably.

e. Take maximum advantage of the Overton window shift provided by Sen. Johnson, Tucker Carlson, Bret Weinstein, Clayton Morris, Jimmy Dore, Ian Carrol, and others speaking out now about 9/11 – in order to reach hundreds of millions worldwide.

f. Work with Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry (on whose board I also sit) in order to get more FOIA requests submitted to government agencies for missing documents regarding the WTC and the Pentagon, i.e. about Ace Elevator, the missing Pentagon videos, etc.

g. Expose the truth and myth regarding the Shanksville plane crash, in an online conference with invited experts.

h. We might develop a new publicity campaign, “No more False Flag Ops / No more wars”

i. Educate the public about False Flag Ops, so that the public becomes able to call them out in real time – not years later like 9/11, Covid, Gaza, etc.

i. Retire Richard Gage at 80 – after the new 9/11 investigation!

j. We need to complete the book that Richard Gage has started –

i. “The story”

ii. “The evidence”

10. Closing Thoughts

a. AE911Truth may be the single best hope in the world for exposing 9/11, and for supporting the well-known, but few, podcasters who are beginning to speak out. This is required in order to wake up the public and save our country from the totalitarian nightmare in which it has already become partially submerged. It’s ‘all hands on deck’ for the 9/11 Truth Movement, and we are the recognized leader of it. It’s time again to pull ourselves up by our bootstraps and go to work. We need to put our heads together and creatively think about how to make the best of the above projects happen – and carry out that work effectively. We are stepping up, again, to do our part. Will you do yours?

Watch the Interview Now:

We were very honored to be asked onto the Dark Horse podcast. Bret has 521K YouTube subscribers and 1.1M followers on X. He’s a frequent guest on the Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson platforms, and he’s shown a keen awareness of the truth about 9/11 and isn’t afraid to talk about it.

Support the 9/11 Truth Movement!

Right out of the gate, Bret acknowledged that he had been following our work for quite a while and that “when somebody is accused of being a conspiracy theorist, my only question is, ‘are they any good at it?’ ” :)

Then he made me blush: “and I have to say, you set the standard….extremely diligent.…really appreciate the rigor that you bring to that puzzle.”

Keep the Hot Interviews Coming!

Well, I needed to shift gears and jump right into WTC 7 with both feet, so we introduced the sudden, straight-down, symmetrical, free fall of the building — after witnesses heard and saw explosions. Then we launched into the extreme heat — 3 to 4,000 degrees F — which, of course, was also unaccounted for in the official narrative.

Bret was a very active listener and an engaged student of each scientific piece of evidence we presented, and he shared his wisdom with us liberally. For instance, when hearing of the mysterious billions of “previously molten iron microspheres” of “unknown origin” distributed ubiquitously through out the WTC dust, and that the equally puzzling “red-gray chips” of nano-thermite actually produce those same iron microspheres when ignited, he drew the following inference:

 “Let me just say logically speaking, what you’ve got is a material, these tiny spheres of formerly molten iron, a mechanism which demonstrably generates them.

And that puts the burden of proof on somebody who says that what brought these towers down was fire. And in the case of the Twin Towers, some structural damage. It puts the onus on them to generate a competing explanation for those anomalous, readily observed phenomena. They don’t. The burden of proof logically falls on them.

And the question then is not, for those of us who are suspicious here, The question is, well come up with anything that is as plausible. Let’s see you demonstrate it.

When we arrived at the explosive evidence of the Twin Towers, he saw each piece building upon the last and arriving at the proof of the fraud of NIST in the fabrication of their theory that the top section of the building above the point of plane impacts drove the rest of the building down to the ground and then destroyed itself. The building was quite obviously blown up.

It was quite disappointing to read some of the comments that chastised Weinstein for delving into these particular conspiracy theories. People really react emotionally and, obviously, without even watching the interview, make quite self-revealing comments on the YouTube video platform, despite supporting his other “conspiracy theories.” They, some of them, just couldn’t stomach this one. If only they’d take the time to watch. You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make them drink.

Joe Rogan May be Next! Support Us!